RE: common sense (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message

Rule -> RE: common sense (1/19/2010 7:27:27 PM)

Well done, angelikaJ, but that was a rhetorical remark that called for the OP to respond.



stella41b -> RE: common sense (1/20/2010 12:24:09 AM)

But then again we've all sort of proved the OP's point.



Rule -> RE: common sense (1/20/2010 12:27:24 AM)

Which of his points?

According to angelikaJ these were his points:

"I believe the gist of it is that he is open in his acceptance of people in his on-line friends list in much the same way Jesus associated with outcasts.
That Jesus would not condemn gay marriage.
That “ We hold these truths to be self –evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that are among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness” means that same sex marriage should be allowed in this country.
Also his belief is that while in his own yard he should have the right to do what he chooses provided it does not harm another which includes mowing his yard unencumbered by clothing. Should his neighbor find the view to be objectionable then he and his neighbor could build a fence to protect the rights of both: his neighbor not to see, and he to mow freely.
... more or less I think that is the subject matter".



wandersalone -> RE: common sense (1/20/2010 12:41:21 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: topdom54

if this is ever published I will probably be locked away as a nut.


Yes

quote:

ORIGINAL: domiguy

This could be a totally new kink..Where online Doms would try and "one up" the loony sub behavior of a previous Dom and his dipshit sub.

I was thinking about actually creating a "real" profile.

It wiil have to mention that I am currently only seeking the mentally ill and unbalanced.

I think I will have to demand photos. 


hmmmmmm methinks I tick all ya boxes oh domiguy-ish one [:D]



stella41b -> RE: common sense (1/20/2010 12:57:32 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Rule

Which of his points?

According to angelikaJ these were his points:

"I believe the gist of it is that he is open in his acceptance of people in his on-line friends list in much the same way Jesus associated with outcasts.
That Jesus would not condemn gay marriage.
That “ We hold these truths to be self –evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that are among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness” means that same sex marriage should be allowed in this country.
Also his belief is that while in his own yard he should have the right to do what he chooses provided it does not harm another which includes mowing his yard unencumbered by clothing. Should his neighbor find the view to be objectionable then he and his neighbor could build a fence to protect the rights of both: his neighbor not to see, and he to mow freely.
... more or less I think that is the subject matter".


This point

quote:



if this is ever published I will probably be locked away as a nut.



Now go back and read the responses. Mine included.

The thing is, he is making a very valid point. Jesus preached and taught non-conformity in moral and spiritual affairs. But today many seek to decide for the morality of others, such as the government. Therefore the freedom as declared in the Constitution is nothing more than a myth.

Now I would agree with all he wrote except for one thing. He wrote that all men are born equal - I disagree with this. I would say that all men are born individual, and as such have equal right to freedom.

See it now?



Rule -> RE: common sense (1/20/2010 1:04:12 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: domiguy
My fetish is mental illness.

Oh! Now I comprehend that this was in reply to me asking for a summary. Thank you, domiguy.



Rule -> RE: common sense (1/20/2010 1:20:39 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: stella41b
quote:


if this is ever published I will probably be locked away as a nut.

Now go back and read the responses. Mine included.

I have.

quote:

ORIGINAL: stella41b
The thing is, he is making a very valid point. Jesus preached and taught non-conformity in moral and spiritual affairs. But today many seek to decide for the morality of others, such as the government. Therefore the freedom as declared in the Constitution is nothing more than a myth.

Now I would agree with all he wrote except for one thing. He wrote that all men are born equal - I disagree with this. I would say that all men are born individual, and as such have equal right to freedom.

See it now?

Yes. They were making fun of him because they considered him nuts. Most of that had eluded me. I thought that everyone was merely waiting until he clarified what his post was about. I saw that angelikaJ later inserted blank lines between his paragraphs, making it better readable. I may read her effort at a later time.



Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 [5]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
3.222656E-02