Why no insults for men? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


lusciouslips19 -> Why no insults for men? (1/23/2010 6:56:20 PM)

So I have been thinking about this all day today. In the "Financially secure" thread someone said feminism was a success, so why should he pay for women? I also thought about a thread long ago when a friend was asking for advice about a bad dominant that abused females. All of a sudden men started saying, "you have no proof". So women tend to be objectified, demoralized and then demonized, They are used and then called whores for it,while men are patted on their backs and called studs.

So how come there is not a demeaning equivalent for slut, cunt, whore for men, that packs the same punch?

Lets talk about this...




Rhodes85 -> RE: Why no insults for men? (1/23/2010 7:00:57 PM)

quote:

So how come there is not a demeaning equivalent for slut, cunt, whore for men, that packs the same punch?


equivilants are....

man-whore
munt
man-slut
manties (man-panties)
bill clinton

[:D]




lusciouslips19 -> RE: Why no insults for men? (1/23/2010 7:03:23 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Rhodes85

quote:

So how come there is not a demeaning equivalent for slut, cunt, whore for men, that packs the same punch?


equivilants are....

man-whore
munt
man-slut
manties (man-panties)
bill clinton

[:D]


It doesnt have the same demeaning connotation. Call a man a manwhore, its a compliment.




Mercnbeth -> RE: Why no insults for men? (1/23/2010 7:15:41 PM)

perhaps because most people seem to enjoy perpetuating lame stereotypes...and the weak generalizations that accompany them.

for this slave, it is the intent behind the words that determines this slave's perception of insult or not...not the inherent right/wrong-ness of any specific word used towards any specific gender identity.




Rhodes85 -> RE: Why no insults for men? (1/23/2010 7:19:43 PM)

quote:

It doesnt have the same demeaning connotation. Call a man a manwhore, its a compliment.


Hmm I hadn't thought of it that way.

I don't think the same applies to calling him bill clinton though




BKSir -> RE: Why no insults for men? (1/23/2010 7:22:20 PM)

I always thought "man" or "men" was an insult...  We tend to be pretty awful creatures overall.




Tantriqu -> RE: Why no insults for men? (1/23/2010 7:23:54 PM)

Slut is gender-neutral.
Prick is gender-specific, for use instead of the b-word.




KatyLied -> RE: Why no insults for men? (1/23/2010 7:25:54 PM)

Lushy - Wouldn't it have been easier (if you wanted to find the man-whores) to start a thread titled:
Wanted:  Man-Whores:  Announce Yourselves Here:

[;)]




sunshinemiss -> RE: Why no insults for men? (1/23/2010 7:28:34 PM)

There is always pussy, douchebag, bitch... ohhh those are women oriented slams for men.  Even mother f*cker is rather woman focused...

You may have a point here...




Rhodes85 -> RE: Why no insults for men? (1/23/2010 7:29:58 PM)

quote:

Wanted:  Man-Whores:  Announce Yourselves Here:


Half of cm would post then [8D] they're not manwhores....they prefer the term 'experienced with women' [8D]




sunshinemiss -> RE: Why no insults for men? (1/23/2010 7:33:40 PM)

I do believe that your definition makes me a Man Whore... Ohhhh wait till I tell Bear!




Level -> RE: Why no insults for men? (1/23/2010 7:44:39 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: lusciouslips19


quote:

ORIGINAL: Rhodes85

quote:

So how come there is not a demeaning equivalent for slut, cunt, whore for men, that packs the same punch?


equivilants are....

man-whore
munt
man-slut
manties (man-panties)
bill clinton

[:D]


It doesnt have the same demeaning connotation. Call a man a manwhore, its a compliment.


It isn't the same, very true. A great deal of the time, as soon as the word "feminism" is uttered, my eyes start rolling like a bus down a cliff, but not on this topic. Maybe it's just because I want women to feel free to fuck, but still.... [:D]




Level -> RE: Why no insults for men? (1/23/2010 7:46:46 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BKSir

I always thought "man" or "men" was an insult...  We tend to be pretty awful creatures overall.


As are women, whenever they're given the chance, BK.




BKSir -> RE: Why no insults for men? (1/23/2010 7:50:38 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: sunshinemiss

I do believe that your definition makes me a Man Whore... Ohhhh wait till I tell Bear!


Where is that sexy beast anyway?  I haven't seen him around here for a while.  Is he off being naughty (and hopefully taking pictures)?

quote:

ORIGINAL: Level


quote:

ORIGINAL: BKSir

I always thought "man" or "men" was an insult...  We tend to be pretty awful creatures overall.


As are women, whenever they're given the chance, BK.


Point well made sir... point well made.




lusciouslips19 -> RE: Why no insults for men? (1/23/2010 7:53:50 PM)

quote:

There is always pussy, douchebag, bitch... ohhh those are women oriented slams for men. Even mother f*cker is rather woman focused...

You may have a point here...


I was remembering a line from the Feminist Novel ; a work of fiction by Marilyn French called "The Woman's Room". that sort of told the story of why there was a women's movement. The book characters were living through the late 50s and early 60's. The men cheated, the women were miserable and took pills. Anyhoo, there was a line in the book i will never forget. It said basically. "Men hate Niggers and Spicks but they are afraid of them. Woman don't even get the respect of fear".




Rhodes85 -> RE: Why no insults for men? (1/23/2010 7:57:06 PM)

quote:

I do believe that your definition makes me a Man Whore... Ohhhh wait till I tell Bear!


he'll be ever so pleased i'm sure [:D]




LafayetteLady -> RE: Why no insults for men? (1/23/2010 8:03:26 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: sunshinemiss

There is always pussy, douchebag, bitch... ohhh those are women oriented slams for men.  Even mother f*cker is rather woman focused...

You may have a point here...



I don't consider "douchebag" to be necessarily "woman oriented." Of course if it is because douchebags are for washing "stuff" out of a women, how about "scumbag?"




blacksword404 -> RE: Why no insults for men? (1/23/2010 8:03:41 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: lusciouslips19

So I have been thinking about this all day today. In the "Financially secure" thread someone said feminism was a success, so why should he pay for women? I also thought about a thread long ago when a friend was asking for advice about a bad dominant that abused females. All of a sudden men started saying, "you have no proof". So women tend to be objectified, demoralized and then demonized, They are used and then called whores for it,while men are patted on their backs and called studs.

So how come there is not a demeaning equivalent for slut, cunt, whore for men, that packs the same punch?

Lets talk about this...


Because women tend not to want a man who is a virgin or close to it.(Untested,unproven, no reference history, no practice) And men want a woman who is not a whore or a semi-recovered one.   Men and women tend to look for different things.

I had this conversation with my mom years ago. And that was my answer to her. If women looked for men that were virgins then things would change. Us men are by definition whores. Calling a man a whore has the opposite effect than was intended. Now tell him he can only fuck ugly women and that will work.




pyroaquatic -> RE: Why no insults for men? (1/23/2010 8:08:47 PM)

twatwaffle, cumdumpster.... damn...

um...

OH NEEDLEDICK!!!!




popeye1250 -> RE: Why no insults for men? (1/23/2010 8:50:03 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Rhodes85

quote:

So how come there is not a demeaning equivalent for slut, cunt, whore for men, that packs the same punch?


equivilants are....

man-whore
munt
man-slut
manties (man-panties)
bill clinton

[:D]



Yeah, I've heard people use "Clinton" like a verb; "That s.o.b. clintoned that poor woman!"




Page: [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875