RE: Conspiracy theories ? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


SL4V3M4YB3 -> RE: Conspiracy theories ? (1/27/2010 10:13:50 AM)

I don't know what a two legged flower is but I'm sure tonight I'll be having nightmares about giant evil sunflowers with short floppy green arms chasing me around the garden.




heartcream -> RE: Conspiracy theories ? (1/27/2010 10:15:39 AM)

You are a two-legged flower as am I.




SL4V3M4YB3 -> RE: Conspiracy theories ? (1/27/2010 10:21:52 AM)

People generally only call me that when I'm wearing my bright yellow E-collar, not so easy to see where I’m going and very hazardous when it rains.




vincentML -> RE: Conspiracy theories ? (1/27/2010 7:37:03 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: heartcream

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML



Sorry heartcream, it just seems like a load of bullshit to be debating about what happened to witches so long ago when in more recent history there have been far greater atrocities that dwarf those about which you are concerned.

I refer to the Black slavery holocaust, the slaughter of the indigenous people of the Americas, Stalin's murder of millions in the USSR, Mao's atrocities in China, the killings in Cambodia, Rwanda, East Timor, the Japanese in Mongolia, China, and SE Asia, and of course the German camps and ovens.

I refer also to the atrocity of poverty, lack of protein, clean drinking water, warmth and shelter, and ready medical assistance amongst the non-white peoples of the southern hemisphere; in the cities and rural districts of the USA right now, today!

With all of the horror of recent memory and that still on our doorstep, you choose unjustly murdered witches to be your cause? Something about which you can no longer do anything? Seems to be a misdirected waste of the talent of an intelligent and compasionate young woman.

Is the modern horror more than you can endure and so you turn away? Or are you unaware?


Are you freaking serious???

How do you get that by mentioning the freaking atrocities of days gone by, in one area (atrocities freaking abound in history and the present this is one area of toxic hateful bullshit crap) that in any way disputes the freaking horrors that have gone on since and now?

How do you make that conclusion?

My head is shaking in disbelief. Some of you people, honestly.

I didnt come in here trouncing witch killings as a freaking cause. Someone mentioned it and I thought in a derogatory way and said something about it.

I cannot understand why you think this in anyway negates all the massive amounts of horrors going on in the world now, and then. None of it dwarfs any of it. One evil and wrong thing done is wrong and evil, any where any time. None of it dwarfs any of it, it is all bad, it all sucks, it is all wrong, I would love to see justice done to each and every wrong done.

I am well aware of the gross misconduct of some of the monsters wandering our planet doing unspeakable things to two-legged flowers on our Earth. There is shite going on hat not even you know about.

I dont get your point at all. I turn away? You think modern horror any freaking different than any horror? What the feck you talkin about boy?


Well, I'm glad we got that freakin cleared up, girl. Nine million witches bullshit. I'm talkin about that crap you put out there before it takes a bit of a poke to get you to acknowledge real horror. Of course what happened in the far past does not negate the horrors of the recent history. I did not say that. Inventing ridiculous numbers does, however.

Musicmystery mentioned witches in an offhand remark and you jumped on his ass about it, making it such a big deal. I see no intent in his comment to be derrogatory about witches who suffered persecution. He was obviously referring to comments made by RealOne. You took the issue off in a different direction by making your accusation against MM. He was clearly contesting the "mocking of silly people who look to evidence" to be as akin to witchhunts without evidence. He answered you clearly at #188 but you could not let it go. You certainly did make a cause of it. Like MM said, learn to read in context.

Shit, now we have to be politically correct about the way we use the word "witches." That's BS.




Real0ne -> RE: Conspiracy theories ? (1/30/2010 12:58:01 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

Oh, wait, I forgot. That would constitute proof, and on this thread, proof is bad.

I'll keep working on it. I'm still used to reconciling ideas to reality. It's a hard habit to break.




what is proof?

a bunch of thugs who use yellow to rope off the area so they can write history any way they want?

Then a report that cherry picks through everything for the same?

thats proof?




thornhappy -> RE: Conspiracy theories ? (1/30/2010 3:05:33 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: heartcream
What they are doing in the Congo etc is no freaking different is it? Here we are in 2010 and women with clits coming out over their labia are hunted down, and gang fucked, killed and then freaking eaten maing.


I've really got to ask where this comes from - I know about FGM in Africa and westernized countries, but never heard of this combination of events.




pahunkboy -> RE: Conspiracy theories ? (1/30/2010 3:14:51 PM)

FR-

debt mathematically can never be fully repaid.  Not with interest it can not.  All debt -to be paid in full- can simply can not happen when there is interest upon it.

ALso- the sun flower is symbolic of sun worship.  You see this Illuminati item in the back ground in tv shows.    Once you keep an eye open - you find that symbolism is rampant in anything on TV/Movie screen.




willbeurdaddy -> RE: Conspiracy theories ? (1/30/2010 4:18:36 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

FR-

debt mathematically can never be fully repaid.  Not with interest it can not.  All debt -to be paid in full- can simply can not happen when there is interest upon it.


Hogwash. There is no debt that cant theoretically be repaid in full, with interest, regardless of the interest rate. Whether a certain can be repaid in practice is a different story, but if thats what you are talking about, which debt in particular are you referring to. And if its the national debt, hogwash again. There are perfectly reasonable assumptions wrt economic growth and or spending cuts, and interest rates where a current debt = 100% of GDP can be paid off.




NorthernGent -> RE: Conspiracy theories ? (1/30/2010 4:26:20 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

FR-

debt mathematically can never be fully repaid.  Not with interest it can not.  All debt -to be paid in full- can simply can not happen when there is interest upon it.

ALso- the sun flower is symbolic of sun worship.  You see this Illuminati item in the back ground in tv shows.    Once you keep an eye open - you find that symbolism is rampant in anything on TV/Movie screen.



Try this the next time the bank calls for their money......"look mate - debt can never be fully repaid and then there's sunflowers". I'd imagine the bank would have a different take on the matter...."right-o son - money now please".

Even the Germans could have paid reparations after WW1 - but chose not to do so.





pahunkboy -> RE: Conspiracy theories ? (1/30/2010 6:18:57 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy


quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

FR-

debt mathematically can never be fully repaid.  Not with interest it can not.  All debt -to be paid in full- can simply can not happen when there is interest upon it.


Hogwash. There is no debt that cant theoretically be repaid in full, with interest, regardless of the interest rate. Whether a certain can be repaid in practice is a different story, but if thats what you are talking about, which debt in particular are you referring to. And if its the national debt, hogwash again. There are perfectly reasonable assumptions wrt economic growth and or spending cuts, and interest rates where a current debt = 100% of GDP can be paid off.


So when say all the money in the world is loaned at 1%- then how to you gather that the extra 1% then exists-?

Of all the debt in the world- how can it possibly be repaid?   Not with interest- because it does not exist yet- unless the bank creates it.






pahunkboy -> RE: Conspiracy theories ? (1/30/2010 6:20:54 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: NorthernGent


quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

FR-

debt mathematically can never be fully repaid.  Not with interest it can not.  All debt -to be paid in full- can simply can not happen when there is interest upon it.

ALso- the sun flower is symbolic of sun worship.  You see this Illuminati item in the back ground in tv shows.    Once you keep an eye open - you find that symbolism is rampant in anything on TV/Movie screen.



Try this the next time the bank calls for their money......"look mate - debt can never be fully repaid and then there's sunflowers". I'd imagine the bank would have a different take on the matter...."right-o son - money now please".

Even the Germans could have paid reparations after WW1 - but chose not to do so.





Treaty of versailles- for war debts..   yeah.




willbeurdaddy -> RE: Conspiracy theories ? (1/30/2010 6:25:05 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy


quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

FR-

debt mathematically can never be fully repaid.  Not with interest it can not.  All debt -to be paid in full- can simply can not happen when there is interest upon it.


Hogwash. There is no debt that cant theoretically be repaid in full, with interest, regardless of the interest rate. Whether a certain can be repaid in practice is a different story, but if thats what you are talking about, which debt in particular are you referring to. And if its the national debt, hogwash again. There are perfectly reasonable assumptions wrt economic growth and or spending cuts, and interest rates where a current debt = 100% of GDP can be paid off.


So when say all the money in the world is loaned at 1%- then how to you gather that the extra 1% then exists-?

Of all the debt in the world- how can it possibly be repaid?   Not with interest- because it does not exist yet- unless the bank creates it.





Its impossible for all of the money in the world to be loaned.




pahunkboy -> RE: Conspiracy theories ? (1/30/2010 6:57:15 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy


quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy


quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

FR-

debt mathematically can never be fully repaid.  Not with interest it can not.  All debt -to be paid in full- can simply can not happen when there is interest upon it.


Hogwash. There is no debt that cant theoretically be repaid in full, with interest, regardless of the interest rate. Whether a certain can be repaid in practice is a different story, but if thats what you are talking about, which debt in particular are you referring to. And if its the national debt, hogwash again. There are perfectly reasonable assumptions wrt economic growth and or spending cuts, and interest rates where a current debt = 100% of GDP can be paid off.


So when say all the money in the world is loaned at 1%- then how to you gather that the extra 1% then exists-?

Of all the debt in the world- how can it possibly be repaid?   Not with interest- because it does not exist yet- unless the bank creates it.





Its impossible for all of the money in the world to be loaned.



--but all dollars are debt. 

not an asset.

it is a promise- per federal reserve note.




thornhappy -> RE: Conspiracy theories ? (1/30/2010 7:03:01 PM)

other folks raised my question...




MrMister -> RE: Conspiracy theories ? (1/30/2010 7:30:36 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

--but all dollars are debt. 

not an asset.

it is a promise- per federal reserve note.



This is made worse by the fact that an entity, namely the Federal Reserve, can simply print money on an as needed basis. Unfortunately, this will come to roost at some point in the future (who knows when), as this current juggling act simply cannot be sustained. And it definitely will be a horrific correction to have to endure.

In regards to conspiracy theories - Surely the majority of these conspiracy theories that have been thrown around are indeed false and seemingly started by unstable individuals; however, we really must look at each of them based upon the merits of each claim or instance. We shouldn't be so ready to summarily dismiss each and every one of them, particularly when solely based upon what we read or see in the main stream media. If we in fact are concerned citizens, we would take the time to make our own evaluations based upon the evidence that is readily available. Not simply take someone else's word on it, or take the lazy mans course of action and merely sit on the couch and do nothing but watch TV.  Some of these claims being made, at the very least, warrant being looked into by all who love liberty and freedom. Suffice it to say, if more folks would indeed take the time to get involved and/or investigate some of the claims being made, and have been made for many years now, more folks might very well be shocked at what they find. If we only approach these events/instances/theories with a truly open mind, more than likely we would generally find the preponderance of the evidence indicates that there is certainly something afoul or simply just doesn't add up. But sadly, the vast majority are not in the slightest bit interested in ever pursuing such an avenue, which by the way is precisely the way "the powers that be" prefer it. There are power in numbers and the more people who are aware, the greater the risk for those who are in control of the masses.




Real0ne -> RE: Conspiracy theories ? (1/30/2010 8:35:05 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

FR-

debt mathematically can never be fully repaid.  Not with interest it can not.  All debt -to be paid in full- can simply can not happen when there is interest upon it.
quote:

ORIGINAL: NorthernGent

Try this the next time the bank calls for their money......"look mate - debt can never be fully repaid and then there's sunflowers". I'd imagine the bank would have a different take on the matter...."right-o son - money now please".

Even the Germans could have paid reparations after WW1 - but chose not to do so.
quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy
Hogwash. There is no debt that cant theoretically be repaid in full, with interest, regardless of the interest rate. Whether a certain can be repaid in practice is a different story, but if thats what you are talking about, which debt in particular are you referring to. And if its the national debt, hogwash again. There are perfectly reasonable assumptions wrt economic growth and or spending cuts, and interest rates where a current debt = 100% of GDP can be paid off.

Neither one of you guys understand hunk is sayin here.

let me draw a picture.

There is a grand total of 10,000 bucks in circulation. not a cent more.

If you have 100 bankers with 100 dollars to lend and 100 people that will each borrow 100 dollars from each of the bankers @10% interest and........the next day pay it back.

Meaning they will pay back 101 dollars to the bank each.

So on day 1 they all borrow 100 bucks then on day 2 bring it back to pay back the banker.

How do they pay back the extra dollar they owe as a result of the 10% interest when there is only a grand total 10,000 bucks of legal tender that exists in the world?

Some how another 100 dollars has to be coughed up somewhere because you cant bring the banker a pig or a goat you can only bring him a banking instrument known as legal tender.

That said how do you ever pay back a debt using a debt instrument?

So where does this extra buck times 100 come from.




thornhappy -> RE: Conspiracy theories ? (1/30/2010 8:40:55 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrMister
But sadly, the vast majority are not in the slightest bit interested in ever pursuing such an avenue, which by the way is precisely the way "the powers that be" prefer it.

What I often see here is a tendency to declare people that don't believe the conspiracy theories as sheeple, dupes, lazy, etc.




Real0ne -> RE: Conspiracy theories ? (1/30/2010 8:49:01 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrMister

quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

--but all dollars are debt. 

not an asset.

it is a promise- per federal reserve note.



This is made worse by the fact that an entity, namely the Federal Reserve, can simply print money on an as needed basis. Unfortunately, this will come to roost at some point in the future (who knows when), as this current juggling act simply cannot be sustained. And it definitely will be a horrific correction to have to endure.

In regards to conspiracy theories - Surely the majority of these conspiracy theories that have been thrown around are indeed false and seemingly started by unstable individuals; however, we really must look at each of them based upon the merits of each claim or instance. We shouldn't be so ready to summarily dismiss each and every one of them, particularly when solely based upon what we read or see in the main stream media. If we in fact are concerned citizens, we would take the time to make our own evaluations based upon the evidence that is readily available. Not simply take someone else's word on it, or take the lazy mans course of action and merely sit on the couch and do nothing but watch TV.  Some of these claims being made, at the very least, warrant being looked into by all who love liberty and freedom. Suffice it to say, if more folks would indeed take the time to get involved and/or investigate some of the claims being made, and have been made for many years now, more folks might very well be shocked at what they find. If we only approach these events/instances/theories with a truly open mind, more than likely we would generally find the preponderance of the evidence indicates that there is certainly something afoul or simply just doesn't add up. But sadly, the vast majority are not in the slightest bit interested in ever pursuing such an avenue, which by the way is precisely the way "the powers that be" prefer it. There are power in numbers and the more people who are aware, the greater the risk for those who are in control of the masses.


if you take the time to read the codes you would discover that the whole government is based in fraud.

If the founders were here right now they would take them down as fast as they could write the writs and refill their quills.

Most people cant because the you will not find an honest court as they are an extension of the bank.




willbeurdaddy -> RE: Conspiracy theories ? (1/30/2010 8:51:19 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: MrMister

This is made worse by the fact that an entity, namely the Federal Reserve, can simply print money on an as needed basis. Unfortunately, this will come to roost at some point in the future (who knows when), as this current juggling act simply cannot be sustained. And it definitely will be a horrific correction to have to endure.



Look for Invisible Black's discusson on the Fed. He is the only one who both understands it and has the patience to explain it.




Real0ne -> RE: Conspiracy theories ? (1/30/2010 8:53:47 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: thornhappy

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrMister
But sadly, the vast majority are not in the slightest bit interested in ever pursuing such an avenue, which by the way is precisely the way "the powers that be" prefer it.

What I often see here is a tendency to declare people that don't believe the conspiracy theories as sheeple, dupes, lazy, etc.



and that is because they are.

most do not know either willfully or by denial the difference.

they have the misguided perception that a conspiracy is something hidden when most often its in front of your nose and often you are a participant and are none the wiser.

I assure you that unless you took specific measures to avoid such you are an enemy of the state because you are in violation of the gold clause in the federal (and most state), constitution(s) and the twea.




Page: <<   < prev  9 10 11 [12] 13   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875