Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

O'reilly whines as FOX shuts door to AID


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> O'reilly whines as FOX shuts door to AID Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
O'reilly whines as FOX shuts door to AID - 1/26/2010 11:22:34 PM   
housesub4you


Posts: 1879
Joined: 4/2/2008
Status: offline
It seems the big GOP leader is whining again, this time about the stars who performed for the benefit concert for Haiti who won't go on his show or return calls.  But what he seems to forget is that the FOX network was the only major network who refused to air the program. 

Seems like they do not like their own medicine.

http://thinkprogress.org/2010/01/26/oreilly-haiti/

Sure some will say ir's the liberal press, but what can you say when it is a video of the big leader himself?
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: O'reilly whines as FOX shuts door to AID - 1/26/2010 11:38:27 PM   
popeye1250


Posts: 18104
Joined: 1/27/2006
From: New Hampshire
Status: offline
He should be celebrating! Who'd want that "Hollywood" crew on your show anyway?

_____________________________

"But Your Honor, this is not a Jury of my Peers, these people are all decent, honest, law-abiding citizens!"

(in reply to housesub4you)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: O'reilly whines as FOX shuts door to AID - 1/27/2010 4:34:00 AM   
SeekingAZ


Posts: 82
Joined: 9/24/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: housesub4you

It seems the big GOP leader is whining again, this time about the stars who performed for the benefit concert for Haiti who won't go on his show or return calls.  But what he seems to forget is that the FOX network was the only major network who refused to air the program. 

Seems like they do not like their own medicine.

http://thinkprogress.org/2010/01/26/oreilly-haiti/

Sure some will say ir's the liberal press, but what can you say when it is a video of the big leader himself?



When was O'Reilly elected the head of the RNC ? When did he turn conservative at all ?

(in reply to housesub4you)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: O'reilly whines as FOX shuts door to AID - 1/27/2010 5:35:13 AM   
subrob1967


Posts: 4591
Joined: 9/13/2004
Status: offline
Fox did show it, Fox News didn't.

(in reply to SeekingAZ)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: O'reilly whines as FOX shuts door to AID - 1/27/2010 5:42:50 AM   
servantforuse


Posts: 6363
Joined: 3/8/2006
Status: offline
O'reilly is a registered independent.

(in reply to subrob1967)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: O'reilly whines as FOX shuts door to AID - 1/27/2010 5:51:48 AM   
Louve00


Posts: 1674
Joined: 2/1/2009
Status: offline
The Hope for Haiti Now program, sponsored by those "Hollywood" people, raised over 57 million so far, and still counting.  They will be taking donations for the next six months and 100% of the money you donate thru the Hope for Haiti cause goes directly to the ground on Haiti.  Unlike Red Cross, who is also a reputable and good source to donate to, but Red Cross uses (about) 25 cents on every dollar donated for administrative purposes.  My figures aren't spot on, but I take volunteer calls for both Red Cross, and did for the Hope for Haiti Now program.

**editted to add....I don't mean to derail this thread with off-topic bs, but those Hollywood folk have the bucks and morality to make the cause worthwhile for everyone. IMO.  O'Reilly, no matter what he's registered as, lost out when he chose not to support them.

< Message edited by Louve00 -- 1/27/2010 5:54:38 AM >


_____________________________

For the great majority of mankind are satisfied with appearance, as though they were realities and are often more influenced by the things that seem than by those that are. - Niccolo Machiavelli

(in reply to servantforuse)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: O'reilly whines as FOX shuts door to AID - 1/27/2010 6:10:42 AM   
Moonhead


Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline
That said, you do wonder if they could raise more money by donating themselves instead of staging a benefit concert to encourage people with less money than them to do so.

_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to Louve00)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: O'reilly whines as FOX shuts door to AID - 1/27/2010 6:22:51 AM   
Louve00


Posts: 1674
Joined: 2/1/2009
Status: offline
Wellllll....aside from donating their talents during the drive itself, here's a short list of the ones I know donated.  And while I don't have the time to google them all to find out who donated what, a whole lot of celebrities have donated money as well as their time.....
Jennifer Aniston donates $500,000
Brad & Angelina donate $1M to Haiti
Diddy’s son donates birthday money to Haiti
Leonardo DiCaprio donates $1M to Haiti
Sandra Bullock donates $1M to Haiti

http://www.celebritysmackblog.com/2010/01/26/celebrity-haiti-donations-anonymous-yeah-right/

_____________________________

For the great majority of mankind are satisfied with appearance, as though they were realities and are often more influenced by the things that seem than by those that are. - Niccolo Machiavelli

(in reply to Moonhead)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: O'reilly whines as FOX shuts door to AID - 1/27/2010 6:31:18 AM   
UncleNasty


Posts: 1108
Joined: 3/20/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Louve00

The Hope for Haiti Now program, sponsored by those "Hollywood" people, raised over 57 million so far, and still counting.  They will be taking donations for the next six months and 100% of the money you donate thru the Hope for Haiti cause goes directly to the ground on Haiti.  Unlike Red Cross, who is also a reputable and good source to donate to, but Red Cross uses (about) 25 cents on every dollar donated for administrative purposes.  My figures aren't spot on, but I take volunteer calls for both Red Cross, and did for the Hope for Haiti Now program.

**editted to add....I don't mean to derail this thread with off-topic bs, but those Hollywood folk have the bucks and morality to make the cause worthwhile for everyone. IMO.  O'Reilly, no matter what he's registered as, lost out when he chose not to support them.


It is required that tele-solicitors inform you what percentage of your donation actually goes to the cause/s they are soliciting for, but only if you ask. I got a call from one of those "America's Fallen Heros" kind of places one day claiming to be raising money for the widows of law enforcement officers that had been slain while on duty. I asked the question. The answer that came back made my jaw drop. "Sir, 12% of your donation goes directly to the widows. And that's a high percentage!"

My point is that a 25% "administrative cost seems comparitively  low.

Uncle Nasty

(in reply to Louve00)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: O'reilly whines as FOX shuts door to AID - 1/27/2010 6:45:20 AM   
Moonhead


Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Louve00

Wellllll....aside from donating their talents during the drive itself, here's a short list of the ones I know donated.  And while I don't have the time to google them all to find out who donated what, a whole lot of celebrities have donated money as well as their time.....
Jennifer Aniston donates $500,000
Brad & Angelina donate $1M to Haiti
Diddy’s son donates birthday money to Haiti
Leonardo DiCaprio donates $1M to Haiti
Sandra Bullock donates $1M to Haiti

http://www.celebritysmackblog.com/2010/01/26/celebrity-haiti-donations-anonymous-yeah-right/

Fair enough. There's an unpleasant tendency over here for celebrities to view this sort of thing as free publicity that'll do them a lot more good than whatever charity they've sacrificed an afternoon for. Everybody remembers how Live Aid more or less raised Queen's career from the dead, after all.


_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to Louve00)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: O'reilly whines as FOX shuts door to AID - 1/27/2010 6:55:29 AM   
Louve00


Posts: 1674
Joined: 2/1/2009
Status: offline
I do understand, Moonhead.  I feel the same way for that, as I do when people say Obama wanting to help is for his own political gain.  Let anyone who donates prosper from what they give.  This cause is so great and the Haitians benefit too, no matter.  In fact, the Haitians benefit more because what would they (the Haitians) do if everyone just sat back and analyzed how politically correct their actions to help were?

_____________________________

For the great majority of mankind are satisfied with appearance, as though they were realities and are often more influenced by the things that seem than by those that are. - Niccolo Machiavelli

(in reply to Moonhead)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: O'reilly whines as FOX shuts door to AID - 1/27/2010 7:21:27 AM   
rulemylife


Posts: 14614
Joined: 8/23/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: servantforuse

O'reilly is a registered independent.


Isn't every conservative Republican these days?

Just like Glenn Beck and a few posters on this board who claim their impartiality while supporting every core conservative issue and every Republican talking point.

(in reply to servantforuse)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: O'reilly whines as FOX shuts door to AID - 1/27/2010 7:50:10 AM   
SL4V3M4YB3


Posts: 3506
Joined: 12/20/2007
From: S.E. London U.K.
Status: offline
How does one register independent anyway? I mean I see the benefits but isn't independent just another way of saying 'yeah I'll sit on the fence until someone fucks up'

Bill O'Reilly is about as independent as his hand is from his arm. Do we really believe he is independent? Calling yourself independent is a form of elitism i.e. 'oh no I don't believe what one side or the other says. I judge for myself using advanced statistical analysis of the economy and our war effort, I'm not a party man like you other mugs.'

I don’t mind admitting I’m not independent I can’t envisage a day where I’ll be voting conservative because there is a clear difference in terms of doing what is right for people as a whole rather than people as individuals. A couple of years ago the difference between parties was tiny perhaps but when times are hard the difference is always massive.


< Message edited by SL4V3M4YB3 -- 1/27/2010 7:52:48 AM >


_____________________________

Memory Lane...been there done that.

(in reply to rulemylife)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: O'reilly whines as FOX shuts door to AID - 1/27/2010 8:00:02 AM   
popeye1250


Posts: 18104
Joined: 1/27/2006
From: New Hampshire
Status: offline
Hey, after this is over maybe we could get all these celebs to do a broadcast for homeless people in this country!
Bill O'Reilly; "Angelina Jolie, how many homeless people are there in California alone?"
"O.K. we'll give you a minute!"
"Cato Calin same question!" "Duh..............could you repeat the question?"


_____________________________

"But Your Honor, this is not a Jury of my Peers, these people are all decent, honest, law-abiding citizens!"

(in reply to rulemylife)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: O'reilly whines as FOX shuts door to AID - 1/27/2010 8:05:26 AM   
housesub4you


Posts: 1879
Joined: 4/2/2008
Status: offline
quote:

"Angelina Jolie, how many homeless people are there in California alone?"


I believe she is attempting to adopt every child in haiti and other 3rd would countries.  Did anyone hear the rumor that she had an affair with one of her children 's teacher.  It was a long line at the checkout lane

(in reply to popeye1250)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: O'reilly whines as FOX shuts door to AID - 1/27/2010 8:14:51 AM   
Mercnbeth


Posts: 11766
Status: offline
quote:

I don’t mind admitting I’m not independent I can’t envisage a day where I’ll be voting conservative because there is a clear difference in terms of doing what is right for people as a whole rather than people as individuals.


Are you really? Do you really want to do "what is right for the people as a whole" or do you want to do what's right for the exceptions to the greater majority? The unemployed, the hungry, the homeless, the uninsured, are all minorities. The Individuals not in that situation are a much greater part of that "whole" and the efforts to socially engineer or redistribute from the greater whole to the exceptions is accomplishing one thing - creating more exceptions.

The question is, how much of the 'whole', who are under the exact same conditions not hungry, homeless, or uninsured, are you willing to sacrifice to do what you deem "right"? Why is it government's duty to serve as source of charity for these minority exceptions? What incentive is there for the minority to change their situation will they have when actions taken by government serve them better when they fail to provide for themselves, but encumber them by taxes and regulations when don't fail?

I'm not an independent either - I'm a member of the 'Pragmatist' party, actions and decisions taken by individuals or corporations deserve the consequences they earn. The 'whole' isn't benefited by its government when they use resources they don't have to provide charity for a minority of exceptions. That's the purpose of charities not government; and the reason they enjoy their tax exempt status.

(in reply to SL4V3M4YB3)
Profile   Post #: 16
RE: O'reilly whines as FOX shuts door to AID - 1/27/2010 8:16:37 AM   
Louve00


Posts: 1674
Joined: 2/1/2009
Status: offline
I don't know about how many she's adopting in Haiti.  She already seems to be the big joke on the amount of children she has lol.  But I do believe her husband is in charge of rebuilding sound, hurricane proof homes for the people in NOLA who lost their homes.  He's put millions into the project last I heard. 

I guess its like anything, I guess.  Nobody forces us to spend what extra we have on what causes are out there.  I guess celebrities pick their own causes too.  Its their money and their time

_____________________________

For the great majority of mankind are satisfied with appearance, as though they were realities and are often more influenced by the things that seem than by those that are. - Niccolo Machiavelli

(in reply to housesub4you)
Profile   Post #: 17
RE: O'reilly whines as FOX shuts door to AID - 1/27/2010 8:23:36 AM   
flcouple2009


Posts: 2784
Joined: 1/8/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Louve00

The Hope for Haiti Now program, sponsored by those "Hollywood" people, raised over 57 million so far, and still counting.  They will be taking donations for the next six months and 100% of the money you donate thru the Hope for Haiti cause goes directly to the ground on Haiti.  Unlike Red Cross, who is also a reputable and good source to donate to, but Red Cross uses (about) 25 cents on every dollar donated for administrative purposes.  My figures aren't spot on, but I take volunteer calls for both Red Cross, and did for the Hope for Haiti Now program.

**editted to add....I don't mean to derail this thread with off-topic bs, but those Hollywood folk have the bucks and morality to make the cause worthwhile for everyone. IMO.  O'Reilly, no matter what he's registered as, lost out when he chose not to support them.


I am not sure how 100% of the proceeds can go directly to Haiti.  The telethon had virtually everything of a major call center tied up taking calls.  Their physical call centers and almost all of their home agents.  There were so many calls their entire system, which is extensive, was over loaded.  I do know they didn't volunteer their entire operation for the night and the workers were getting premium pay just to insure that enough people would be on the phones. 

This I know because the female half here was getting paid for answering those calls.

< Message edited by flcouple2009 -- 1/27/2010 8:24:18 AM >

(in reply to Louve00)
Profile   Post #: 18
RE: O'reilly whines as FOX shuts door to AID - 1/27/2010 8:41:48 AM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

That said, you do wonder if they could raise more money by donating themselves instead of staging a benefit concert to encourage people with less money than them to do so.


1) Who's to say they didn't?
2) Obviously, far more money can be raised quickly this way.
3) Money was raised. Who cares which fingerprints are on the bills?

Haitians were helped. Fans enjoyed a concert. Pundits got to whine about it.

Everybody wins.


(in reply to Moonhead)
Profile   Post #: 19
RE: O'reilly whines as FOX shuts door to AID - 1/27/2010 8:42:29 AM   
Louve00


Posts: 1674
Joined: 2/1/2009
Status: offline

2. How much of my donation will go directly toward helping people in Haiti?
100 percent of all donations raised from the public will go directly to relief organizations on the ground in Haiti. No administrative costs or other program expenses are charged by "Hope for Haiti Now."


https://hopeforhaitinow.org/FAQ.asp

Sorry if the font came out huge.  I pasted it from the link above.  I knew the statistics because I too took calls.  She should have too, but its an easy enough fact to google, which I just did. 

_____________________________

For the great majority of mankind are satisfied with appearance, as though they were realities and are often more influenced by the things that seem than by those that are. - Niccolo Machiavelli

(in reply to flcouple2009)
Profile   Post #: 20
Page:   [1] 2   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> O'reilly whines as FOX shuts door to AID Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109