RE: Has the world gone completely mad? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


popeye1250 -> RE: Has the world gone completely mad? (1/28/2010 6:21:57 PM)

Switch over to being a Dominant and you won't have that problem.




xxblushesxx -> RE: Has the world gone completely mad? (1/28/2010 7:19:24 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: RedMagic1

Yes.  Although -- prodommes date.  Several have personals on this site, in fact, looking for relationship partners.  I've dated two off CM.  Interestingly, both of their personal profiles were "sub," although they sexually switched.  It's not uncommon to want strong nilla, or dom, for boyfriend, and want subs/slaves professionally.



Quoted for truth...




AquaticSub -> RE: Has the world gone completely mad? (1/28/2010 7:49:03 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: kinkbound

quote:

Ahh... there is the key. You want to have all the power in this situation.

It's not an alarming trend, it doesn't take long, it not complicated, you just have to give up your ID before she does. And that bothers you.


That's absurd. This has had absolutely nothing to do with taking a long time or being complicated, and everything to do with wanting to know what a woman looks like and what she charges before I disclose my ID. I think I've made this clear enough already.

Also, showing someone what you *look* like via photos, and quoting donation requirements isn't nearly the same as disclosing one's legal name, city and state, and telephone number.

By the way, do you often tell other people what bothers them? This seems a bit rude, if not outright flame baiting.


You can consider it rude or flame baiting all you like but that is how you are coming across.

If she gives you her photo, she is IDing herself. You can do whatever the hell you want with that photo. In fact, you can take it and masturbate to it for free and stop talking to her - which is not good for her business. That gives you the power in the situation because once you see the picture you have the choice to have yourself a little wank fest, to continue contact and pay her or just walk away.

She isn't letting you have that control. She wants the control of knowing who you are and how serious you are about paying her before you get to see her picture, before she runs the risk of you getting off for free, you turning to a stalker and trying to find her at munches, etc. That way, if you start going nuts with her picture, she's got a lead on you. It's safer for her.

Quite frankly, I'm not sure either way is wrong. But I don't think it reflects particularly well on yourself that you are so bothered by it by the fact that you don't get to see her first.




kinkbound -> RE: Has the world gone completely mad? (1/28/2010 10:03:11 PM)

quote:

You can consider it rude or flame baiting all you like but that is how you are coming across.

If she gives you her photo, she is IDing herself. You can do whatever the hell you want with that photo. In fact, you can take it and masturbate to it for free and stop talking to her - which is not good for her business. That gives you the power in the situation because once you see the picture you have the choice to have yourself a little wank fest, to continue contact and pay her or just walk away.

She isn't letting you have that control. She wants the control of knowing who you are and how serious you are about paying her before you get to see her picture, before she runs the risk of you getting off for free, you turning to a stalker and trying to find her at munches, etc. That way, if you start going nuts with her picture, she's got a lead on you. It's safer for her.

Quite frankly, I'm not sure either way is wrong. But I don't think it reflects particularly well on yourself that you are so bothered by it by the fact that you don't get to see her first.


Ahhh, so *now* the truth finally comes out. I've been wondering why you've been taking little swipes at me at almost every opportunity. It's all clear now.

You're looking to get into the business (post 49), and you would rather be in a position of not to giving out your photos to unidentified prospective clients, in fear that some of these men will masturbate to your photos without you getting paid! No *wonder* you've been siding with the provider in my scenario.

Well, here's my opinion regarding wank material. This notion of yours of providing free wank material to prospective customers is *beyond* absurd. Good grief! Is your opinion of men so low, that you think they need to go through all this trouble just to get some free photos to wank to??? Let me assure you that with all the free porn on the internet these days, guys certainly don't need photos of providers to obtain free wank material!






submaleinzona -> RE: Has the world gone completely mad? (1/29/2010 7:15:29 AM)

Since this thread brings up business practices, a question came to mind: Are any Pro Dommes listed with the Better Business Bureau? (It may seem like a silly question, but in matters of business, it might be good to know.)




xxblushesxx -> RE: Has the world gone completely mad? (1/29/2010 7:32:48 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: kinkbound

quote:

You can consider it rude or flame baiting all you like but that is how you are coming across.

If she gives you her photo, she is IDing herself. You can do whatever the hell you want with that photo. In fact, you can take it and masturbate to it for free and stop talking to her - which is not good for her business. That gives you the power in the situation because once you see the picture you have the choice to have yourself a little wank fest, to continue contact and pay her or just walk away.

She isn't letting you have that control. She wants the control of knowing who you are and how serious you are about paying her before you get to see her picture, before she runs the risk of you getting off for free, you turning to a stalker and trying to find her at munches, etc. That way, if you start going nuts with her picture, she's got a lead on you. It's safer for her.

Quite frankly, I'm not sure either way is wrong. But I don't think it reflects particularly well on yourself that you are so bothered by it by the fact that you don't get to see her first.


Ahhh, so *now* the truth finally comes out. I've been wondering why you've been taking little swipes at me at almost every opportunity. It's all clear now.

You're looking to get into the business (post 49), and you would rather be in a position of not to giving out your photos to unidentified prospective clients, in fear that some of these men will masturbate to your photos without you getting paid! No *wonder* you've been siding with the provider in my scenario.

Well, here's my opinion regarding wank material. This notion of yours of providing free wank material to prospective customers is *beyond* absurd. Good grief! Is your opinion of men so low, that you think they need to go through all this trouble just to get some free photos to wank to??? Let me assure you that with all the free porn on the internet these days, guys certainly don't need photos of providers to obtain free wank material!





Doesn't matter how much free porn there is, guys still want a picture of a certain girl or even a certain body part (such as a foot) of a certain girl, and yes, they *will* wank to it.
Why do so many (dare I say it, mostly sub) men come to these boards and start threads just for wank fodder?
I called one out on it last night, and he wrote me a very nice email confessing to it.
*shrugs*
I sent him my 900 number in case he wants to chat. *lol*

The point is this: you weren't a good match. Not everyone is. You may disagree with her business model, but until you are paying her bills (and even then there is no guarantee) you have no right to dictate how she does business.

Of course you can have an opinion on it, but as you can see, your opinion doesn't change anything. If something doesn't work for you, move on.




submaleinzona -> RE: Has the world gone completely mad? (1/29/2010 9:04:36 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: xxblushesxx

Why do so many (dare I say it, mostly sub) men come to these boards and start threads just for wank fodder?


I hope I don't come across that way, but there's an old saying: Idle hands are the Devil's workshop. Some guys may be just bored without anything better to do. Some guys just do strange things. Back when I was in college (even before the rise of the Internet), the police would get periodic reports of someone masturbating in the library or some other inappropriate public situation. I suppose stuff like that still goes on. It's always a man, of course. You don't hear any stories about women masturbating in the library. Many other men wouldn't blatantly break the law like that, but I guess they'll do whatever they think they can get away with. Back in the days before caller ID, there were obscene phone callers who would call women at random just to get off.





kinkbound -> RE: Has the world gone completely mad? (1/29/2010 10:29:35 AM)

I have no argument with people having the right to decide upon their own business model, any more than I do with people having the right not to do business with certain business models. She stuck to her model, and I moved on to seek another provider.

I have no argument with people having and expressing their own opinions. You and others may agree with her business model. I just happen to disagree. It is of my opinion that it is upside down. I wouldn't buy into this arrangement any more than I would give a car dealer my full name, city and state, and telephone number just for the privilege of seeing what his car looks like and the sticker price.

We can debate about additional legal risks that providers have, but it seems that with proper precautions, these too can be eliminated. So far, no one has countered what my attorney-relative had advised me some years ago (post 51). Perhaps someone knowledgable in law will still come along and update us.

We can debate about wankers looking for freebies, but if we look at other lines of business, we see many consumers seeking freebies. Look at the no-questions-asked return policies of many major retail stores these days for a quick example. Use the item one time for what you needed it for, and simply return it for a refund.

We can debate about security risks, but nothing is going to stop the rare psychopath who has little or no regards for consequences. Advanced precautions won't prevent crimes of passion that are ignited by unbridled emotion either. Those operating within the parameters of sanity know that they've left some electronic forensics behind.

You and others can call me old school if you like, and maybe I am. The concept of this business model is too against the grain to everything I've ever known, for me to do anything but reject it. I have nothing personal against this woman, but I do hope that her business model in general eventually fails across the board. For if we see it take hold and succeed in this line of business, it may not be long before it is attempted in other lines of business as well.

This is the very first time I've encountered this business model. I wish I had waited at least a few hours to allow my WTF emotions to dissipate before posting. But aside from a somewhat melodramatic beginning, I believe my message has been fairly consistent here.

For those who agree with this woman's business model, go with it. For those who disagree, reject it. While I hope it fails, eventually the market will dictate.




Rhodes85 -> RE: Has the world gone completely mad? (1/29/2010 1:44:54 PM)

quote:

You then have a big wallet?


Indeed. Oh..wait you said wallet....? [8D]

Sounds like shes playing games. Its not necessary to go through that much bs to even get a rate quote from her.




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125