|
LadyConstanze -> RE: The Hypocritical Domme (8/17/2011 12:46:11 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: ElanSubdued
As to the notion of short replies, my experience is that what a dominant writes in a profile may or may not indicate their preferred style of interaction. Thus, though their profile may be lengthy and detailed, this doesn't necessarily mean the dominant wants an equivalently detailed response, particularly when it comes to introduction letters. Similarly, the dominant may or may not like expressing themselves in detail and may prefer certain mediums over others. There is a natural flow that occurs in conversations and when I'm not feeling this, I may try to invigorate it, but if it still isn't working, I let the conversation go. There's really not much you can do when the mutual connection isn't working.
It depends very much, it's really like at a party or in a bar or pub, somebody says hello and you say hello back, a conversation unfolds or it folds. Because somebody introduces himself to me, I don't feel the need to have a very deep conversation with that person, now if I find that person repulsive (and some CMails or profiles are the equivalent of really bad BO in real life) or I have encountered the person before or watched them interact with others in a way that just makes me put distance between us, I move on.
Sometimes you get the feeling you do get on, sometimes it doesn't happen. To be honest if somebody sends me an epic as an introduction letter, I switch off, I find that quite presumptuous to simply assume I want to know all about the person, a short note, possibly a bit more than just one line, combine it with a question or something that would get a conversation going works much better. Still no guarantee but again the numbers are off, much more guys than women.
|
|
|
|
