USA and The Third Reich (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Aneirin -> USA and The Third Reich (2/7/2010 5:55:16 AM)

An interesting programme on tv last Tuesday, Channel four's ;  Human Zoos - Science's dirty secret

Not sure if everyone can see this page, but I will post it anyway for those that can ;

http://www.channel4.com/programmes/the-human-zoo-sciences-dirty-secret/episode-guide/series-1/episode-1

It was reported that the world fairs of the past were human zoos, because of the different world's people that were exhibited there for all to see and draw their own conclusions, one of those that drew their own conclusion from  an exhibit of the Pygmy tribesman; Ota Benga at the Bronx Zoo wrote a book about his findings on scientific racism which he wished to promote along with purity of type, the book ;

The Passing Of The Great race by Madison Grant, which when translated into German in 1930, he received a letter from a foreign politician stating that Grant's book was his Bible, that foreign politician was Adolf Hitler and it is said that Grant's book formed the basis of Hitler's Third Reich.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1224189/Caged-human-zoo-The-shocking-story-young-pygmy-warrior-monkey-house--fuelled-Hitlers-twisted-beliefs.html  (ignore the newspaper name, what is written there is a good precis of what the tv programme said )

So, because of  Madison Grant's beliefs and writings, the world had the Third Reich and what happened in that regime, but the question is when Hitler was doing what he was doing to those he saw as inferior, what was the thought in USA and the UK at that time, horror, or something different based on the eugenic education  of the time ?






Moonhead -> RE: USA and The Third Reich (2/7/2010 5:58:50 AM)

Madison Grant's ideas were compatible with a lot of other theories that were popular in Germany at the time, unfortunately. He was a long way from being the only begetter of this stuff, most of which had been around since the mid nineteenth century.




Aneirin -> RE: USA and The Third Reich (2/7/2010 6:25:15 AM)

Yes, Darwin's half cousin; Sir Francis Galton of 1883, the one who used evolution as a reason for defining and keeping the upper class in Britain, where Britain was more concerned with class, other created ideas to seperate people based on their skin colour and features. Oddly though, from scientific racism the study of genes came into being.




Moonhead -> RE: USA and The Third Reich (2/7/2010 6:36:12 AM)

There was a big deal of trying to find separate ancestors for the different races in Victorian paleontology, wasn't there?




DarkSteven -> RE: USA and The Third Reich (2/7/2010 7:53:22 AM)

I doubt that Hitler would have done anything differently without Madison Grant.  I suspect that a lot of his beliefs were pandering to the German mindset at the time, and that he would have formulated them no matter what.




DomKen -> RE: USA and The Third Reich (2/7/2010 8:04:40 AM)

Hitler may have written a gushing letter to an author but if one actually studies him and the Nazi movement you will find sources that long predate that author and many are exclusively German.





AnimusRex -> RE: USA and The Third Reich (2/7/2010 10:29:47 AM)

So Godwin's Law is maintained- the thread BEGINS with Hitler....

Steven is right- Hitler had his own internal workings, and likely would have latched onto whatever book or pamphlet he could find to support his delusions (not unlike many a conspiracy buff).

One reason Nazism grew so rapidly in popularity, was that eugenics and racial classification was a very popular and acceptable idea among the intelligentsia from the Enlightenment through the Victorian era. It was common for Europeans and Americans to view indigenous peoples as alien species, either with fond condescension or alarmed fear and loathing. It was common for the mentally retarded to be sterilized, and Margaret Sanger famously advocated birth control as a method of suppressing the high birth rates of "undesirable" people.
Hitler was only at the extreme end of an argument that was actually mainstream.

It was the Holocaust that so shocked the conscience of Western intellectuals that eugenics quickly fell from favor after WWII.




NorthernGent -> RE: USA and The Third Reich (2/7/2010 10:46:32 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: AnimusRex

Hitler was only at the extreme end of an argument that was actually mainstream.

It was the Holocaust that so shocked the conscience of Western intellectuals that eugenics quickly fell from favor after WWII.



That really does do a disservice to the breadth of European thought.

German ideas and English ideas were like chalk and cheese.

The English were more than happy to export their ideas - in fact they made it a hobby - but these ideas were based on a political system i.e. the idea that free trade among communities would lead to a peaceful existence among nations.

This is entirely different to Hitler's race based ideas.




Real0ne -> RE: USA and The Third Reich (2/7/2010 12:24:29 PM)

who knows?  maybe hitler read the Soncino talmud?

I did not look up every one of these but I did verify several of them in the tractates.

http://www.revisionisthistory.org/talmudtruth.html




Moonhead -> RE: USA and The Third Reich (2/7/2010 2:45:38 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: NorthernGent


quote:

ORIGINAL: AnimusRex

Hitler was only at the extreme end of an argument that was actually mainstream.

It was the Holocaust that so shocked the conscience of Western intellectuals that eugenics quickly fell from favor after WWII.



That really does do a disservice to the breadth of European thought.

German ideas and English ideas were like chalk and cheese.

The English were more than happy to export their ideas - in fact they made it a hobby - but these ideas were based on a political system i.e. the idea that free trade among communities would lead to a peaceful existence among nations.

This is entirely different to Hitler's race based ideas.

Not entirely different, sadly. There was a lot of racism in Britain during the thirties, not to mention fascists like Mosley.
That's without even getting started on the antisemitic slant of huge chunks of British literature and other art.




Aneirin -> RE: USA and The Third Reich (2/7/2010 3:20:30 PM)

So,if everything racist seems to bear down to dislike of the jews, may I ask why there is such dislike of jews beyond the understanding that jews killed Jesus.




Moonhead -> RE: USA and The Third Reich (2/7/2010 3:25:16 PM)

Institutionalised antisemitism in the Christian religion is a part of that, sadly. There's historical reasons and a big dose of xenophobia as well, though.
(And I didn't say that all racism starts with antisemitism. I just pointed out to NG that Hitler's loathing of jews was hardly unusual in a man of his generation, and had plenty of analogues in the UK.)




Aneirin -> RE: USA and The Third Reich (2/7/2010 3:33:13 PM)

I was wondering if the hatred of jews was about their ability to work hard and be shrewd in business, to me, they it seems have the wealth and where there is wealth, there is power. Persecution of jews could be likened to envy over what jews have built by hard work. Perhaps it is dislike might be down to no more than jealousy, non jews want what jews have, but are not prepared to put the work in to achieve ?




Moonhead -> RE: USA and The Third Reich (2/7/2010 3:35:46 PM)

That's definitely a part of it. I think the fact that judaism is as much a culture as a religion, and tends to form its own communities within the wider society has a lot to do with it as well.




Aneirin -> RE: USA and The Third Reich (2/7/2010 3:56:39 PM)

Judaism it seems is a religion that comes before a nationality, much like the moslems, but with Christianity it seems nationality comes first. Perhaps with this in mind, it was seen that jews could not be loyal to a country or state, because religion came first, jews could not be involved with the persecution of people of their own belief, unlike Christians, who have zero qualms about what they do to get what they want.




NorthernGent -> RE: USA and The Third Reich (2/8/2010 1:49:09 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

Not entirely different, sadly. There was a lot of racism in Britain during the thirties, not to mention fascists like Mosley.



The Nazis were almost a democratically elected party. In 1932 - they were the largest party in Germany.

Meanwhile in England Mosley's fascists weren't even on the radar.....in fact a) when they (a couple of thousand of them) marched in places such as East London and Newcastle they got kicked back to where they came from b) they were seen as a joke - people couldn't take their seriousness seriously and what percentage of the population supported them? I'd guess 2% maximum.....which is very different to the Nazis 30 odd% in 1932.




MasterDonfromPA -> RE: USA and The Third Reich (2/8/2010 2:02:03 PM)

I know My voice isn't heard Often in the forums, But i just would like to add a word of caution, Its easy to look at history through a filter, But we Must also use caution to use the APPROPRIATE filter, As an example, In the thinking of the times, Columbus discovered a new world populated by savages and therefor free for the taking, However to look at what was done then using the standards of today make Columbus a war criminal, slaver and worse.... I personally find little but contempt for those that use revisionist history for personal gains or goals, history is Not up for interpretation it is what it was, A fact is a fact, I know there will be A lot of People that won't agree with My Point of view But its Mine and I am entitled to it as much as anyone else is....

We can discredit Many of the pasts Conclusions ,Now, looking at things from a More scientific Point, However One day I am sure there will be Looking at What we believe as fact and shaking their heads at how stupid and foolish we were then, Such Poor Pathetic Unenlightened creatures........




Moonhead -> RE: USA and The Third Reich (2/8/2010 3:47:47 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: NorthernGent


quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

Not entirely different, sadly. There was a lot of racism in Britain during the thirties, not to mention fascists like Mosley.



The Nazis were almost a democratically elected party. In 1932 - they were the largest party in Germany.

Meanwhile in England Mosley's fascists weren't even on the radar.....in fact a) when they (a couple of thousand of them) marched in places such as East London and Newcastle they got kicked back to where they came from b) they were seen as a joke - people couldn't take their seriousness seriously and what percentage of the population supported them? I'd guess 2% maximum.....which is very different to the Nazis 30 odd% in 1932.

Sunderland, not Newcastle.
I take your point, but he was pretty successful and his influence was steadily growing until Britain went to war with fascists elsewhere and queered his career by doing so. Unity Mitford was a big deal at one point as well. It was a lot more than 2%, sadly.




DomKen -> RE: USA and The Third Reich (2/8/2010 4:39:13 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Aneirin

I was wondering if the hatred of jews was about their ability to work hard and be shrewd in business, to me, they it seems have the wealth and where there is wealth, there is power. Persecution of jews could be likened to envy over what jews have built by hard work. Perhaps it is dislike might be down to no more than jealousy, non jews want what jews have, but are not prepared to put the work in to achieve ?

The fact is that most Jews weren't wealthy or even successful. They lived much like, and in most cases side by side with, their christian neighbors.





samboct -> RE: USA and The Third Reich (2/8/2010 5:34:57 PM)

"The fact is that most Jews weren't wealthy or even successful. They lived much like, and in most cases side by side with, their christian neighbors. "

Sorry- but there are a bunch of misconceptions in this thread that need to be straightened out.  Let me try to answer some of the question based on my knowledge of the history and as a personal example of being a very reformed Jew at Brandeis University and coming into contact with Conservative and Orthodox Jews.

In terms of whether Jew resembled their neighbors- hardly.  They were a merchant class for several reasons through the middle ages-
1)  Jews weren't allowed to own land in many countries- thus they weren't farmers like most of their neighbors.
2)  Rates of literacy amongst Jews were very high- probably the inverse of the rest of the population- somewhere around 90%.
3)  Christians weren't allowed to be moneylenders- but it was an occupation open to Jews.

Hence- Jews handled most of the commerce of the Middle Ages, and not surprisingly, got wealthier than their neighbors.

Jews also lived in ghettos- walled cities.  Ghetto was not considered a pejorative term originally since it was used to help keep the rabble out.

Jewish interactions with their neighbors can best be described as intolerant in all likelihood.  Yes, I know this isn't PC, but like any tribal people that seek to maintain an independent existence, the religion/culture had strict rules about fraternization and lack thereof. Jews, like a lot of others in this situation, considered themselves the "Chosen".  Jewish men weren't supposed to sleep with non-Jewish women because they were considered "unclean"- always a good characterization of somebody that's just not quite as human as you're supposed to be.  Needless to say, Jewish women also weren't supposed to be touched by non-Jewish men.  There's a lot of these strictures wrapped up in the Kosher dietary laws.  In practice- let's say your good Christian neighbors did the normal welcome to the neighborhood bit- and brought over food- perhaps something they'd baked- a chicken- whatever.  Didn't matter- never mind that pork was right out- basically anything was out because it might not have been dealt with in a kosher fashion under strict rabbinical supervision.  You know how it feels when you try to welcome someone and they won't accept your food, your wine, even your hand?  It gets you pretty annoyed with them in short order.  I know this first hand, because the kids I went to school with said I wasn't a Jew since I didn't follow the same rules as they did, and I felt that kind of anger.  Who were they to tell me I wasn't a Jew?  Who were they to look down their noses at me because I didn't believe in not drinking water and taking a shower on Yom Kippur?  Deal with the Hasids in New York, and you'll get pretty aggravated with them in short order in all likelihood.

So a big chunk of the reason why Jews have been singled out through the years has to do with their non-intercourse policy with non-Jews.  Couple this with the envy that Jews basically made easy money, and you've got a group of people that's ripe for segregation and open warfare.

Reform Jews didn't hit the scene till the 1800s IIRC and they became rapidly assimilated in the cultures they joined.  They just weren't as observable as the more orthodox Jews.  I'd lay long odds that during the Holocaust, the reform Jews were hidden more often than the Orthodox, because they'd become friends with other people in the community, whereas the Orthodox would not.  Its the kind of culture where if you don't follow the rules, the other people in the culture shun you- cast you out.  The movie Witness casts the Amish in a largely favorable light, but there's a high price to be paid in lack of freedom and condescension toward others for being in such a group that you can pick up in the movie.

It's easy to keep hatred and persecution alive when there's no first hand experience to counter the propaganda.  Hitler was never very popular in Berlin, and there were a number of Jews that survived the war in Berlin.  In comparison, in the countryside where the Jews probably kept to themselves, or there were no examples of Jews- anti Semitism thrived.  There were plenty of anti Semites in the US as well- Henry Ford and Charles Lindbergh come to mind readily.  Hitler loved to scapegoat, but let's not forget that he was no paragon of tolerance when it came to gays, lesbians, artists, clergy, Communists, gypsies, etc.  Jews were the easiest target because of their self isolation, but basically, they made up only half of Hitler's victims in the death camps- six million others died as well.

In summary- I suspect that the Orthodox restrictions from mingling with their neighbors had a great deal to do with keeping anti Semitism alive and virulent through the centuries.  It's not right to only blame the "Christians" for the maltreatment of the Jews- the Jews did plenty to make sure that they remained a target.

HTH

Sam




Page: [1] 2   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
6.640625E-02