RE: Self-identified geeks

RE: Self-identified geeks (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid

Message

farglebargle -> RE: Self-identified geeks (12/7/2007 9:52:15 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BrutalAntipathy *Firefly rocked! Damn them to rerun hell for cancelling it. And may Joss Whedon be staked by Buffy for not putting in the effort to ressurect it.* You could not, at the time, ever have anything in Popular Culture where the Bad Guys are the "Feds" and it's about personal freedom and liberty in a closing, neo-totalitarian society. Struck way too close to home, and was considered to be too subversive for Popular Consumption. No one is going to mistake an American Idol contestant singing "Light My Fire", as calling for the disaffected youth to set arson to LA. Damn you Richard M. Nixon... Damn you to hell....

StarlightSoul -> RE: Self-identified geeks (12/7/2007 9:58:10 PM)
I was always told I was a bit of a contradiction. In high school I was a the d&d playing, anime watching, fanfiction writing, super shy and quiet cheerleader.

Moloch -> RE: Self-identified geeks (12/7/2007 10:06:55 PM)
How do I answer this? Being is cool now, hell you can buy "geek" in a Mall now in form of patches and t-shirts. What defines geek? DND is pretty much mains tream now hell it was New York's best seller for a while. I think with the advent of electronic games and intenrnet, such activites as playing DND started to be more popular and mainstream.

stella41b -> RE: Self-identified geeks (12/8/2007 2:05:27 AM)
I don't know, maybe I qualify... I'm actually thinking of having a palmtop surgically attached to me, I like sci fi, horror, Goth, vampires, astrology, 1960's music and culture, Bohemian culture, Eastern European culture, I run Windows XP purely for printing, as well as 6 Linux distros - PCLinuxOS, Knoppix, Overclockix, CD Linux PL, Vector Linux, and Xandros.. I still play very old computer games, including Zork - a text based dungeons and dragons game from the early 1980s, I play Frogger, Pacman, and such.. I like the period lifestyle.. I like 19th century Russian art and literature - Pushkin, Chekov, artists such as Ilya Repin, Ivan Kramskoi, and also Communist art Tatyana Yablonskaya, among others, I also like post war Western culture.. I am a minimalist and down-sized.. 'home' for me fits into a medium sized suitcase, all my most essential items, I buy almost everything used and second hand, I never buy anything which isn't truly essential to me, and what I no longer need I give away.. I remember everything what has gone in the past, I know exactly what I am to do today, have a good idea of tomorrow, but next week is a bit vague. This however is all about to change.. but my principles will remain the same..

seeksfemslave -> RE: Self-identified geeks (12/8/2007 3:27:36 AM)
Does an 18 year old boy starting piano lessons qualify as a geek ?That what I did. lol I have NEVA been popular. Does that give me extra points. I had buck teeth up until 3 years ago. The moderaters seem to like me 'cos they approve my posts so maybe I am improving. Mirror mirror on the wall I am the geekiest of them all.

Manawyddan -> RE: Self-identified geeks (12/8/2007 5:30:16 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: ArtCatDom I "wasted" thousands of dollars and countless hours going to college to not finish a degree. I took more than enough credit hours than I'd ever need for even a double major. However, I focused on classes I wanted to take, which included nearly all of the philosophy, religious studies and political science classes I took. That's right, I went to college to do nothing but read Hegel and other insane philosophers for not other reason than I loved the knowledge I was hunting. Yeah well, I have a BA and an unfinished Master's in philosophy myself ... that's why I have such a crap job. I actually tried for years to be a computer geek, but failed miserably. I'm a major comic book geek, and to a lesser degree film, music, and sci-fi geek. I'm also quite pleased to see people on the thread making the same geek/nerd distinction that I use ... it's something I always argue for.

Moloch -> RE: Self-identified geeks (12/8/2007 8:07:23 AM)
Ah and I think thats the definition of geek, a very focus interest and strong knowlege in one or more areas of interest.

MissOchistic -> RE: Self-identified geeks (12/8/2007 9:49:16 AM)
pushes up glasses. Well...011010101110011011100000110010101100001011011101100100110100101101110011000010111010001111001. (ispeakbinary) Level 52 fire mage at your service. ETA: I frikkin' know! Firefly IS the best show evar. Anyone know where I can stream/DL Serenity?

farglebargle -> RE: Self-identified geeks (12/8/2007 10:13:12 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MissOchistic pushes up glasses. Well...011010101110011011100000110010101100001011011101100100110100101101110011000010111010001111001. Once I cleaned up the extra bits ( there were too many for a clean binary conversion, it's clear your message is... "®n¬-Ù4·0º<" For which, the only response can be... 01111001011011110111010100100000011000110110111101110101011011000110010000100000 01101000011000010111011001100101001000000110101001110101011100110111010000100000 01100111011011110110111101100111011011000110010101100100001000000110011001101111 01110010001000000110000100100000001000000111001001100101011000010110110000100000 01100010011010010110111001100001011100100111100100100000011000010111001101100011 01101001011010010010000001100011011011110110111001110110011001010111001001110100 0110010101110010001011100010111000101110

Moloch -> RE: Self-identified geeks (12/8/2007 10:39:15 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MissOchistic pushes up glasses. Well...011010101110011011100000110010101100001011011101100100110100101101110011000010111010001111001. (ispeakbinary) Level 52 fire mage at your service. ETA: I frikkin' know! Firefly IS the best show evar. Anyone know where I can stream/DL Serenity? Uhh no! BattleStar Galactica is!

LadyLegs -> RE: Self-identified geeks (12/8/2007 10:54:38 AM)
I wouldn't say I was a geek, but I did often prefer my own company to the mindless pursuits of others in my age group. Hmmmm... that's still true

Maya2001 -> RE: Self-identified geeks (12/8/2007 12:20:45 PM)
LOL I will leave the geek title to others, though I did end up taking business computer programming back in my early 20s, not so much out of interest but because I found myself divorced with a toddler to support started out working on contract basis but found myself working 18 hours a day, not good when you are a single mom, when I tried to get into entry level jobs with companies wages offered were too low to support myself so changed careers and sold my IBM 64 upgraded to 128 so that it could run COBOL and DBASE and did not get or touch another computer again till 20 years later, I had no interest in sci-fi or star trek or computer games.

Gardenista -> RE: Self-identified geeks (12/8/2007 1:19:06 PM)
Sci-fi, fantasy, and gaming are all very cool pursuits, but I consider myself a bit too "earthy" to qualify as a twue geek. =) Reading is awesome... but it's sometime I do when I can't be outside.

bipolarber -> RE: Self-identified geeks (12/8/2007 1:39:32 PM)
There are times when I relate far too closely to "Oliver" on the BBCA series "Coupling." Here's a scene from my private life, which has played out maybe more than a few times... Imagine a dark apartment. I fumble with the keys, and lead a young lady (or occasionally a guy) in, for a night of fun after meeting at a local club. (click) the lights go on. "Wow, so this is your apartment, eh... pretty cool..." they start saying... "Um.. what is THAT?" "What is what? "That thing in the corner. That looks like an iron maiden or something..." "Oh, that's my Dalek." "Your Dalek." "Yes, it's a creature from a british TV show called "Dr.Who." "So, it's a robot or something." "Not really, that's a mistake that a lot of people make... actually, Daleks are the creatures inside the robot looking shell, which acts as a sort of space suit/personal tank... see, they were mutated during a nutronic war on the planet Skarro and.... At this point, I notice that they are looking at me, unblinking. Long silence. "Look, I don't think this is going to work out...."

thornhappy -> RE: Self-identified geeks (12/8/2007 2:29:06 PM)
Damn, man. I was heavily into Dr Who (met a fair number of the actors) but wowzers! I never had a Dalek in my living quarters. Of course, at the time, I didn't have the room. thornhappy

lazarus1983 -> RE: Self-identified geeks (12/8/2007 3:31:53 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Moloch Ah and I think thats the definition of geek, a very focus interest and strong knowlege in one or more areas of interest. I have to disagree with that. As a very focused interest and strong knowledge in, say...sports, does not qualify you as a geek. I have a very focused interest and strong knowledge of strength training, in Strongman competitions and training, and I don't think that would qualify me as a geek, either. I AM, however, a Star Trek geek and comic book geek. Hell, two of my four tattoos are comic book characters (Sandman and Punisher). Although it is interesting how geek is no longer a disparaging term. The evolution of words and their meaning continues...

Lumus -> RE: Self-identified geeks (12/8/2007 6:38:40 PM)
Hmm. I'd say I'm a geek in many respects, and enjoy the label when it pops up. I was introverted [and to some degree, in some ways, still am...imagine that, those of you who know me!]. I've spent over two decades immersed in science fiction, fantasy, and roleplay,culminating in an unfinished anime-style comic I wrote and sketched; a fantasy world which I have managed to make intricately detailed in these two decades [and more]; dozens of sci-fi and fantasy short stories, novellas, and yes, novels. I've been tinkering with computers when I was a kid [and shame on me for not keeping up...knowing how to program in KOBOL hardly prepares one for c++...]. So there are some pushes his glasses up geeky factors about me. I'd say they're just who I am, and geek is just another label, one that is comfy to me because it espouses a lot of who and what I am.

Page: << < prev 1 2 3 [4]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

3.201294E-02