DarkSteven
Posts: 28072
Joined: 5/2/2008 Status: offline
|
Interesting analogy. The antiwar protests were fueled with genuine anger... the common man couldn't see any benefit in the war, and a lot of people were dying in it. It was never a declared war, and the Congresspeople's children were exempted from service. All in all, complete injustice. The teapartiers are similar in some ways - they feel disenfranchised, and the recent bailouts, which we cannot really afford, and go to propping up a mess caused by unethical if not illegal behavior, were done in spite of 99+% very vocal opposition. Again, a strong "us vs them" mindset. The big difference as I see it is that the antiwar movement was united on a single issue, while the teapartiers don't have as much focus. It's mostly about insane fiscal policies, and the corrupt Wall Street suits getting their bonuses and bailouts like clockwork. The other difference, not an ideological one, is that the antiwar movement did not have the Internet. The teapartiers will be able to communicate and organize more rapidly.
_____________________________
"You women.... The small-breasted ones want larger breasts. The large-breasted ones want smaller ones. The straight-haired ones curl their hair, and the curly-haired ones straighten theirs... Quit fretting. We men love you."
|