quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

anyone want to look up his retort to me on that, throw it in his face?

Of course, the smoke was all over, there was a fucking huge fire in those buildings, or do you want to say that was painted in? The smoke from the car is white, no thermite there, you admit, and the difference in the white smoke areas and the black smoke areas has been repeatedly explained to you and you refuse to acknowledge it.

Oh, here is some more of your 'analysis' refuted by the architect of that building.

http://concretecore.741.com/#anchor1151751

so far, not one shred of evidence or even plausible theory from you, all we got is washers and paper.

Ron

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
so far, not one shred of evidence

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
so far, not one shred of evidence

right no evidence of anything that should have brought that building down except well those big bright white flashes n shit

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
so far, not one shred of evidence

right no evidence of anything that should have brought that building down except well those big bright white flashes n shit

except they do not exist anywhere these big bright white flashes, just your shit is extant.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne
the east side and there is that nose of that alleged plane again sticking right on out the north side.

quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDamnedPanda

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne
the east side and there is that nose of that alleged plane again sticking right on out the north side.

Then Brinkley didn't understand what he was seeing. That's clearly not the nose of a plane.

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

fire here mom.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDamnedPanda

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne
the east side and there is that nose of that alleged plane again sticking right on out the north side.

Then Brinkley didn't understand what he was seeing. That's clearly not the nose of a plane.

3 - 3:30

just like a bad special effect
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x2uOUibW2HM

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers

quote:

ORIGINAL: Thadius

Okay, let's make believe that I believe that all of the buildings that were destroyed were because of a planned conspiracy using explosives, and further that the secret has been kept by those that planted and detonated those explosives.

What happened to the actual planes and passengers that were on those planes? Were the flights faked? The passengers now in witness protection?

Once off transponder the planes in NY were essentially lost as for ident. But we did find them again hitting the WTC. The 'planes' headed for the Pent.,or Pa. or sites 'unknown' were only blips on the radar until lost completely, with the exception of only the approach of the whatever hit the pentagon.

The one allegedly in Pa. allegedly picked up by the AF was then according to Rumsfeld on 9/11...shot down. That is until THE man next to the pres. with the authority to shoot down a civilian airliner, changed his story the next day to it having been crash landed in Pa.

But it was easy after that the plane in Pa. could have been shot down or ditched over the water while there was no plane that hit the pentagon. If one needs to find a plane once off radar, well...good luck.

You want info. on the passengers ? How about a single Arab sirname on any passenger list ? I never saw them.

quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDamnedPanda

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDamnedPanda

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne
the east side and there is that nose of that alleged plane again sticking right on out the north side.

Then Brinkley didn't understand what he was seeing. That's clearly not the nose of a plane.

3 - 3:30

just like a bad special effect
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x2uOUibW2HM

Right. I know what he said. Let me type a little more slowly, and see if you can keep up this time.

He... did... not... understand... what... he... was... seeing.

That... is.... clearly... not... the... nose... of... a... plane.

Did you comprehend it that time?

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

He doesn't speak logic, Panda--ya silly proofer you.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

I havent moved any goalposts. Just pointed out that your "magic hole" was on different sides of the building to where you claimed.

Your tactic is to call everyone stupid, or claim they have changed the goalposts. It is quite transparent to anyone reading the thread, that the onlyone doing that is you.

ok I am going ot do this one last time.

Again;

That was a screenshot of YOUR VIDEO about 20 seconds in showing that the wtc wall healed itself after the plane went in at about 14 or 15 second mark and then at the 21+ mark it blows all to hell.

No where the fuck you get off claiming it is the other side beats the fuck out of me because anyone can see by the enlarged cropping that it is your fucking video and its transparent that either you are falsely remanufacturing the argument or simply do not have a clue what your own video is doing and frankly I dont care which.

quote:

RE: 911----All those People! Why Hasnt Anyone Talked?

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

quote:

RE: 911----All those People! Why Hasnt Anyone Talked?

Finally---Mothman comes forward to explain.....

quote:

ORIGINAL: Pedestrian
I have never posted here before but have been reading this one. I agree with those that feel as if there is extreme reasonable doubt as to whether 9/11 came off just as we were told. But, I know a few things about mechanics and have been researching 9/11 myself as much as I can now and over the last couple of years. I am begining to get real pissed-off and mostly at the govt. secrecy surrounding this attack.

So from what I saw on 9/11 on TV through the following years and putting a few things together I have come to the conclusion that the admin. story is about the wildest conspiracy theory I've ever heard.

For example on the subject of these aircraft. I, looking at science and recorded TV since, try what one might call comparative reasoning. Let's compare results.

BTW, not that we are really seeking the truth but those planes' structures are made of titanium and steel, the engines 6 tons each and trust me, they do not vaporize on contact.

It has never ceased during my reading, to amaze me how I am being asked  to believe that these planes can all burn so, so hot and to do all of that damage to the WTC, even bringing down a building one didn't hit, yet do not burn themselves up.

Am I being asked to believe that they burn what 800-1500 degrees maybe even hotter as an operating temp. but what, 3500 degrees when it hits something ? How ? Why ? I don't.

I am being asked to believe that two jets, each bringing down more steel than an aircraft carrier, while others leave only a small hole in the Pentagon and not even scorching the ground in PA. I don't.

Am I being asked to believe that a rookie (somebody kicked out of flight school for incompetence) did not only a majestic 270 degree turn but defied the laws of aerodynamics flying this jet airliner 400-500 mph only a few feet off the ground ? I don't.

So I have come to a new conclusion, if a commercial jet airliner hit the pentagon or crashed in the dirt pit in Pa. that I saw on TV where the Somerset Co., Pa. coroner did his interview, and almost but not entirely vaporized on contact, then I am the fucking queen of Egypt.