RE: Equality In the D/s Lifestyle (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


CallaFirestormBW -> RE: Equality In the D/s Lifestyle (2/18/2010 6:25:21 PM)

quote:

"Survival of the family" outweighing individuals is something that I've always disagreed with. A "family" is made up of individuals: those individuals come first, and the world will not explode if a relationship ends so that each person can find someone they would be much, much happier with.


First, I apologize in advance for the OT.

I have to admit that the above quote is one of the key reasons that I am poly and always will be (and I have to clarify that I am not talking about sex here, but about loving, committed relationship). A family -may- be made up of individuals, but if we are not willing to sacrifice some part of our ego for the good of something larger than ourselves, then what good is anything we do, except to salve our ever-growing ego? One advantage of a family-style like our House is that we can put the health of the family first, and still take care of our own growth... including welcoming someone else as a companion who fulfills a part of ourselves... without having to "punish" or "abandon" the rest of the family.




jujubeeMB -> RE: Equality In the D/s Lifestyle (2/18/2010 11:51:01 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Aynne88

jujubee...this has been an interesting read. Few points. You can be a "major feminist" and still be perfectly happy, content, inspired and fully complete in a male led relationship if that is your choice, feminism=choice. For this one anyway.

You also sound like some of this is well... a game of sorts, trying to outwit and outsmart the Dom kind of thing. Forgive me if I am misreading your posts, that is just the vibe I am getting. I am much more formally educated than my Dom, and....? He is extremely successful, and who has more of a higher education isn't why I defer to him. I could probably spend time figuring out ways to "outsmart" him, but that absolutely defeats the purpose of being his submissive doesn't it?

I noticed some posts back  you referenced that you love submitting in the bedroom generally, and the numerous posts in this thread about demanding equality make me wonder that perhaps you are confusing being submissive with being unequal. Equal but different, perhaps, but when you enter into a D/s or M/s relationship, generally the premise is that as far as final decision and authority, the male leads the relationship. There is nothing wrong with being a bedroom submissive, at all in fact[;)].   

Finding a man to take your well being into his very hands, to weigh each decision carefully, to love and protect you, it's pretty amazing.  To have that same man also have the final say in making decisions is *for me* wonderful because I spend my days as the one in charge, in a male dominated business, so I am so grateful to not have to do that afterhours, and I don't feel ever less than equal. If he is telling me what to make for dinner, or we are deciding on a vacation spot...my opinions are always measured. He ultimately decides though, and that works for me. I told him way back in the beginning the only thing I would not acquiesce on ever was politics, so we don't discuss it. He being a big R and me being a huge leftist.[;)]. 

Sorry for rambling, He is having surgery tomorrow and I am stressed, tired and worried. I hope this wasn't taken offensively jujubee, just some thoughts.


No offense taken, Aynne. I appreciate your passion for your relationship, and what you've found that's been fantastic for you. I think it's easy, when reading a thread, to miss the six times I stated that I was just talking from MY perspective, and that I know that people in 24/7 relationships are very happy. It just doesn't work for me. The reason I mentioned that I can outsmart my Dom is that, for me, I can't submit unless I feel totally outsmarted. Yes, I know that sounds like a game, but I'm not a submissive who wants to get on her knees and ask politely to serve. I'm a submissive who wants to feel taken and like I'm submitting to a more powerful person than I am. I want to struggle with my body and my mind and be completely, thoroughly, utterly overpowered. When I feel that, it's like someone flips a switch in me and I am suddenly a desperate, slutty, submissive mess of a girl. I can actually feel all my power and control slipping out of me. I freakin love it. I want it all the time, but when I'm in that state, I can't get anything done [:)]

My requirement for a Dom who I can't outsmart is just because I, like every other person here, want to fulfill my deepest sexual needs. I know that D/s is not just sexual. It's not just sexual for me either, or it wouldn't work as thoroughly as it does. Anyway - I want to fulfill the needs I have, and I'm holding out hope that there's a Dom on this earth who I can share an equal partnership with in all decisions and daily life, but who can turn me into submissive mush whenever he might feel like doing so, and who will relish having that power without overstepping the control I want to have over myself. The only way he'll have that power is if he can outsmart me. It's just how I work.

As a final note, I hope that everything with the surgery goes very well. I'm having a rough time myself - I posted a thread recently about how my mom is in the hospital for at least a year and I'm pretty much her sole caretaker. I know that stress and that worry - I'm sorry you have to go through it. Health is just the real necessary thing, isn't it? You think it's a lot of things, but in the end it really is health. Sending good energy to you and your Dom (the internet makes it get there instantly).




jujubeeMB -> RE: Equality In the D/s Lifestyle (2/19/2010 12:08:54 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lorenzo19

Sacrifice the family for the individual and what does the individual have left to give them strength?



The individual is what the individual has left to give them strength. I'm sorry, but I really have issues with the sentiment that people aren't their own most important advocate, supporter and friend. Haven't you ever listened to "Greatest Love of All"?? I hate having to quote Whitney Houston songs to prove a point, but there is nothing on this earth that is more important than your own self esteem. Not ego, self esteem. The family doesn't exist without the individuals in it, but the individuals exist without the family. That alone should be enough proof of which is the more powerful, and which needs to be the backbone.

Read "The Power of One," by Bryce Courtenay and you'll have a pretty good idea of what I'm talking about. I know you won't, but everyone should. Also, read "Invictus," because I feel like that poem all over today, and it's a great poem.




Lorenzo19 -> RE: Equality In the D/s Lifestyle (2/19/2010 11:43:34 AM)

I deviate from the debate somewhat to point out the following:

"If loving you is wrong then I don't want to be right." From a song I vaguely recall.

There are somethings more important than being right. 'Loving' is emotional and being 'right' is logical. Both are valid. Both are opposing. The person is out of balance. There is uncertainty. Conflict. People usually go with thier emotions. But, still there is lack of balance.

I am saying this because your point of view is mostly emotional. your self-esteem is a feeling, not a tangible quantity. My point of view is mostly logical, quantifiable - survival of the family unit.

In essence I cannot persuade you with logic and vice versa. I too have strong feelings about My self-esteem as you do. We both believe family survival is logical. But, I have balanced My essence by regiening in My feelings, and you by reigning in your logic.

Balance between the heart and the mind is acheived by deciding which correct answer is MORE correct based on a value system. Then if the emotions are less correct I need to find another basis for the emotion in question. NOT ignore the emotion; and vice versa.

My point is our values differ. Not our logic or emotions. To convince you of My point of view requires changing your value system. Because that is the basis of how you decide what answer is most correct.

The conundrum here is to work out how value systems are changed, not to dazzle you with brilliance.

Sorry if I am being wordy and repetitive. I could condense it at the risk of missing the point. The song quote really said it all most poetically.

(edited to add) Here is a feeling to think about. If a high self-esteem leaves you alone in the world, is the high self-esteem worth it?
Loneliness is also a feeling. You can use that feeling to form a new basis that acheives balance.




jujubeeMB -> RE: Equality In the D/s Lifestyle (2/20/2010 1:13:30 AM)

If having high self-esteem leaves me alone in this world, the loneliness will be well worth it. Only those with high self-esteem have figured that out. But you know what? I won't be alone in the world, because there are plenty of people who share my value system, which definitely differs from yours (as you pointed out). I disagree that my point of view is illogical - it's actually extremely logical and not remotely emotional, because I'm not allowing a fear of loneliness to control my life, and I'm not allowing love - which is a difficult emotion to hold in check - to lead me away from myself. Love should enhance what's already there, and if it doesn't, then it's not worth even a moment of time.

I think the points have been made, and we should probably let it go. Best wishes to you and yours.




Lorenzo19 -> RE: Equality In the D/s Lifestyle (2/20/2010 1:25:39 AM)

You are still young, jujubee. Remember Us when you are about ten years older.

I agree this horse is beat. Thanks to everyone for having a great attitude and great writing skills.

I'll sum it up. ERR. No conclusion. Everyone draw their own.

I'll keep monitoring this thread in case someone new has more to contribute.




agirl -> RE: Equality In the D/s Lifestyle (2/21/2010 11:54:01 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: jujubeeMB

If having high self-esteem leaves me alone in this world, the loneliness will be well worth it. Only those with high self-esteem have figured that out. But you know what? I won't be alone in the world, because there are plenty of people who share my value system, which definitely differs from yours (as you pointed out). I disagree that my point of view is illogical - it's actually extremely logical and not remotely emotional, because I'm not allowing a fear of loneliness to control my life, and I'm not allowing love - which is a difficult emotion to hold in check - to lead me away from myself. Love should enhance what's already there, and if it doesn't, then it's not worth even a moment of time.

I think the points have been made, and we should probably let it go. Best wishes to you and yours.


I wouldn't buy it from anyone else either. I really haven't a clue about anyone else, but there's only been one person in 52 yrs that I trust making decisions for me.

Until I collided with him, there's no way I'd  have imagined anyone could be better for me, than me. I know me better than anyone else, I STILL know me better than anyone else. I just let him know what I know. It's for my benefit that he knows everything he possibly can know. I don't want to be leaping through hoops like a performing dog for someone else's jollies alone. There has to be FAR more to it. I can and HAVE done it.........but it wasn't JUST a *perform* thing. It had a purpose.

As for being outsmarted......well, I really don't see that as a *game*. If someone isn't *better* than me, what do I want them for? It's logical to want to be better off, not worse off...lol

This has been an interesting thread altogether.

agirl














Whiplashsmile4 -> RE: Equality In the D/s Lifestyle (2/21/2010 1:11:08 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: jujubeeMB
No offense taken, Aynne. I appreciate your passion for your relationship, and what you've found that's been fantastic for you. I think it's easy, when reading a thread, to miss the six times I stated that I was just talking from MY perspective, and that I know that people in 24/7 relationships are very happy. It just doesn't work for me. The reason I mentioned that I can outsmart my Dom is that, for me, I can't submit unless I feel totally outsmarted. Yes, I know that sounds like a game, but I'm not a submissive who wants to get on her knees and ask politely to serve. I'm a submissive who wants to feel taken and like I'm submitting to a more powerful person than I am. I want to struggle with my body and my mind and be completely, thoroughly, utterly overpowered. When I feel that, it's like someone flips a switch in me and I am suddenly a desperate, slutty, submissive mess of a girl. I can actually feel all my power and control slipping out of me. I freakin love it. I want it all the time, but when I'm in that state, I can't get anything done [:)]


Dare I express this, jujubee is not alone. However, this is not about "outsmarting" per se, but rather a natural process in the evolution of a D/s relationship. Intelligence is just one of the many components in the relationship progression, and tends to be key element. The D/s dynamic is establish through natural/normal interaction. It's not achieved by either party trying to adhere (squeeze into) to an advocated orientation ideology to force a D/s relationship along.

quote:


My requirement for a Dom who I can't outsmart is just because I, like every other person here, want to fulfill my deepest sexual needs. I know that D/s is not just sexual. It's not just sexual for me either, or it wouldn't work as thoroughly as it does. Anyway - I want to fulfill the needs I have, and I'm holding out hope that there's a Dom on this earth who I can share an equal partnership with in all decisions and daily life, but who can turn me into submissive mush whenever he might feel like doing so, and who will relish having that power without overstepping the control I want to have over myself. The only way he'll have that power is if he can outsmart me. It's just how I work.


This is regarding the D/s dynamic being dynamic itself. The levels of D/s interaction adjust accordingly within the Realms of day to day life. It's not about forcing D/s for the sake of D/s so people can pronounce they have a D/s relationship. Rather it is a D/s relationship because it's a D/s relationship that's established by natural interation. I hope this concept does not confuse anybody, and makes sense.




agirl -> RE: Equality In the D/s Lifestyle (2/21/2010 1:56:45 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Whiplashsmile4

quote:

ORIGINAL: jujubeeMB
No offense taken, Aynne. I appreciate your passion for your relationship, and what you've found that's been fantastic for you. I think it's easy, when reading a thread, to miss the six times I stated that I was just talking from MY perspective, and that I know that people in 24/7 relationships are very happy. It just doesn't work for me. The reason I mentioned that I can outsmart my Dom is that, for me, I can't submit unless I feel totally outsmarted. Yes, I know that sounds like a game, but I'm not a submissive who wants to get on her knees and ask politely to serve. I'm a submissive who wants to feel taken and like I'm submitting to a more powerful person than I am. I want to struggle with my body and my mind and be completely, thoroughly, utterly overpowered. When I feel that, it's like someone flips a switch in me and I am suddenly a desperate, slutty, submissive mess of a girl. I can actually feel all my power and control slipping out of me. I freakin love it. I want it all the time, but when I'm in that state, I can't get anything done [:)]


Dare I express this, jujubee is not alone. However, this is not about "outsmarting" per se, but rather a natural process in the evolution of a D/s relationship. Intelligence is just one of the many components in the relationship progression, and tends to be key element. The D/s dynamic is establish through natural/normal interaction. It's not achieved by either party trying to adhere (squeeze into) to an advocated orientation ideology to force a D/s relationship along.

quote:


My requirement for a Dom who I can't outsmart is just because I, like every other person here, want to fulfill my deepest sexual needs. I know that D/s is not just sexual. It's not just sexual for me either, or it wouldn't work as thoroughly as it does. Anyway - I want to fulfill the needs I have, and I'm holding out hope that there's a Dom on this earth who I can share an equal partnership with in all decisions and daily life, but who can turn me into submissive mush whenever he might feel like doing so, and who will relish having that power without overstepping the control I want to have over myself. The only way he'll have that power is if he can outsmart me. It's just how I work.


This is regarding the D/s dynamic being dynamic itself. The levels of D/s interaction adjust accordingly within the Realms of day to day life. It's not about forcing D/s for the sake of D/s so people can pronounce they have a D/s relationship. Rather it is a D/s relationship because it's a D/s relationship that's established by natural interation. I hope this concept does not confuse anybody, and makes sense.


It makes sense to me ...lol.

When half of it is written down, it sounds so bloody pompous or twatty.

A lot of what people in online relationships rave about, applies to me...a lot of what Merc and beth or Daddysprop say and live, applies to me...... much of what Domi or Jefff says applies to me too.(dirty, filthy, mean old bastards that they both are).

What I have and live with, will be seen in teeny excerpts in a lot of what people write....but it never quite *says it*........and I never quite *say* it either.

agirl












cloudboy -> RE: Equality In the D/s Lifestyle (2/22/2010 8:34:12 AM)


Sounds like you are espousing the onion theory of observation and experience.

For $3.00 you might get something out of this article on Isaiah Berlin.

See:

http://www.nybooks.com/articles/article-preview?article_id=23670




TopChuck -> RE: Equality In the D/s Lifestyle (2/22/2010 11:19:27 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: jujubeeMB
My requirement for a Dom who I can't outsmart is just because I, like every other person here, want to fulfill my deepest sexual needs. I know that D/s is not just sexual. It's not just sexual for me either, or it wouldn't work as thoroughly as it does. Anyway - I want to fulfill the needs I have, and I'm holding out hope that there's a Dom on this earth who I can share an equal partnership with in all decisions and daily life, but who can turn me into submissive mush whenever he might feel like doing so, and who will relish having that power without overstepping the control I want to have over myself. The only way he'll have that power is if he can outsmart me. It's just how I work.


You don't want to submit, you want to be Dommed?  That's it, isn't it?  You want to push against the wall of Dominance and feel that it's so strong that using all your strength you can't knock it down.  When you finally find that you'll feel safe, right?  And, you'll seek until you find that.

That's not an uncommon tactic by a submissive.  A test of the power of the Dom to control you when you aren't controllable.  It's more common that she resists the physical power of her Dom, testing whether she can render his strength impotent, by enduring past the level he's willing or able to exert his strength.  Except with you, it's pushing against his intellectual power to see if he can be strong enough that you won't be able to neutralize his Dominance.

So called vanilla women do it also, daring their men to exert physical control, after being emotionally abused by pushing him to the point of violence, which he isn't allowed to use.  However, vanilla women have the law on their side.  After pushing him to the breaking point, they run to the authorities and scream, "Aha!  He abused me!", when in truth, she just pushed him to the fight or flight stage and he reacted according to his primal roots and fought.  Voluntary D/s relationships are a way to avoid the unfair power of a submissive in a vanilla relationship.

Here's a suggestion based on my own D/s relationship with a woman who is my intellectual superior in many ways.*  Find a Dom who you think may be able to abide the hard limit you seek.  Trust him and then check his trustworthiness by seeing if he "outsmarts" you by forcing you to maintain your autonomy.  That's what you're afraid of giving up anyway, isn't it; your autonomy?  The right to live your own life, as an individual, while sharing that life with someone you love?  You want to be treasured so much that he helps you be the very best, because he's on your side allowing, no urging, you to do that for yourself?

I think you feel it's abusive for a Dom to require you to surrender your autonomy, without helping you keep your autonomy; even helping you protect your autonomy.  It violates your sense of fairness.  I agree with that feeling, jujubee.  You make yourself the treasure, the prize, that smart Doms seek.  You're forcing him to give you your half of the power exchange.  You're demanding respect and you have a right to demand, yes "demand" your full share in the relationship.

The Dom should propagate the feeling of fairness within the relationship.  A Dom owes his submissive full protection, even against the Dom himself.  She gives up equality for protection.  He re-establishes equality by pulling her alongside and making her his partner.

That's the way it works in great D/s relationships. It leads to the three Dom rules.  1. Find out what she wants to do.  2. Tell her to do it.  3. Both pretend it's the Dom's idea.

When I read your descriptions of your feelings about D/s, I think of Dagney Taggert in "Atlas Shrugged", who kept looking for her intellectual equal.  She couldn't fully submit until she found the strength that allowed her to remain autonomous, within the relationship.  She knelt and he pulled her to her feet alongside him.  She acceded her equality and he gave it back and made her his equal.  Then they both repeated that same process over and over.   That's called "loving".

When you find the person who can do that with you, I daresay, you'll be home, jujubee.

TopChuck

(*All powerful concepts in this post have been reviewed and approved by Realsweet{TC}, who shares copyright, as applicable.)




Lorenzo19 -> RE: Equality In the D/s Lifestyle (2/22/2010 11:58:22 AM)

quote:

That's the way it works in great D/s relationships. It leads to the three Dom rules. 1. Find out what she wants to do. 2. Tell her to do it. 3. Both pretend it's the Dom's idea.


Are you serious? I have heard this before and thought it was a joke. But that's for another thread. Didnt mean to take away from the bulk of your post of which I mostly agree.




TopChuck -> RE: Equality In the D/s Lifestyle (2/22/2010 1:08:16 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lorenzo19

quote:

That's the way it works in great D/s relationships. It leads to the three Dom rules. 1. Find out what she wants to do. 2. Tell her to do it. 3. Both pretend it's the Dom's idea.


Are you serious? I have heard this before and thought it was a joke. But that's for another thread. Didnt mean to take away from the bulk of your post of which I mostly agree.

It's no joke.  You probably saw it, because I said it before.  I thought it was a joke, when I first saw it.  Then I analyzed the D/s interpretation of such a seemingly contradictory set of guidelines for the Dom.  It turns out it can be interpreted to lead to loving domination.

Here's why it's no joke:

1.  Find out what she wants to do:  This involves understanding the submissive, which is a primary responsibility of the (smart) Dominant; hereinafter referred to as 'you'.  This is also the level of caring for, protecting, cherishing that requires consideration about the needs of the submissive as opposed to the wants of the submissive.  Understanding leads to agreement about those wants and needs.  (It is better to reach agreement.)  It's the best place to assert your right of control.  This is what she signed up for; to be understood, so she can trust. Trusting includes her faith that she can believe you will act in her best interests and the best interests of the relationship.

2. Tell her to do it:  Actively Dominate.  Anything that fits her needs can be allowed.  Her wants that aren't harmful to her or the relationship can be allowed.  The impetus for the Dom should be to try to say yes; to avoid saying no for the sake of exercising power.  Remember, she's trusting you to provide beneficial guidance and that includes her trusting your judgment when you say 'no'.  Remember, sometimes 'no' means 'Yes, I treasure you above all else.' - and showing your deep level of wisdom about the relationship helps her appreciate and accept it.  She knows it, because she's such a smart subby.  After all, why else would she have wanted to be your submissive?

3. Both pretend it's the Dom's idea: She expresses her acceptance and appreciation for his Domination, because his understanding has made her feel cherished and respected.   You glow, because you've been trusted and received your acceptance and appreciation strokes.

Ain't D/s grand?  (Hope this helps keep you on your game.)

TopChuck

(Content lovingly approved by realsweet{TC})




Whiplashsmile4 -> RE: Equality In the D/s Lifestyle (2/22/2010 1:15:24 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: TopChuck

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lorenzo19

quote:

That's the way it works in great D/s relationships. It leads to the three Dom rules. 1. Find out what she wants to do. 2. Tell her to do it. 3. Both pretend it's the Dom's idea.


Are you serious? I have heard this before and thought it was a joke. But that's for another thread. Didnt mean to take away from the bulk of your post of which I mostly agree.

It's no joke.  You probably saw it, because I said it before.  I thought it was a joke, when I first saw it.  Then I analyzed the D/s interpretation of such a seemingly contradictory set of guidelines for the Dom.  It turns out it can be interpreted to lead to loving domination.

Here's why it's no joke:

1.  Find out what she wants to do:  This involves understanding the submissive, which is a primary responsibility of the (smart) Dominant; hereinafter referred to as 'you'.  This is also the level of caring for, protecting, cherishing that requires consideration about the needs of the submissive as opposed to the wants of the submissive.  Understanding leads to agreement about those wants and needs.  (It is better to reach agreement.)  It's the best place to assert your right of control.  This is what she signed up for; to be understood, so she can trust. Trusting includes her faith that she can believe you will act in her best interests and the best interests of the relationship.

2. Tell her to do it:  Actively Dominate.  Anything that fits her needs can be allowed.  Her wants that aren't harmful to her or the relationship can be allowed.  The impetus for the Dom should be to try to say yes; to avoid saying no for the sake of exercising power.  Remember, she's trusting you to provide beneficial guidance and that includes her trusting your judgment when you say 'no'.  Remember, sometimes 'no' means 'Yes, I treasure you above all else.' - and showing your deep level of wisdom about the relationship helps her appreciate and accept it.  She knows it, because she's such a smart subby.  After all, why else would she have wanted to be your submissive?

3. Both pretend it's the Dom's idea: She expresses her acceptance and appreciation for his Domination, because his understanding has made her feel cherished and respected.   You glow, because you've been trusted and received your acceptance and appreciation strokes.

Ain't D/s grand?  (Hope this helps keep you on your game.)

TopChuck

(Content lovingly approved by realsweet{TC})



Service Topping - is what you're trying to get at here.






TopChuck -> RE: Equality In the D/s Lifestyle (2/22/2010 1:32:34 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Whiplashsmile4
Service Topping - is what you're trying to get at here.


I view D/s as a balanced exchange of power, where each receives equal benefit.  Maybe Service Topping and Service Bottoming would describe how I view it; certainly not exclusive service by the Dom to the submissive, no matter how others interpret it.

Call it whatever you wish.  Trivialize to your hearts content.  I'll enjoy mine and you enjoy yours.

TopChuck





Whiplashsmile4 -> RE: Equality In the D/s Lifestyle (2/22/2010 1:46:36 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: TopChuck

quote:

ORIGINAL: Whiplashsmile4
Service Topping - is what you're trying to get at here.


I view D/s as a balanced exchange of power, where each receives equal benefit.  Maybe Service Topping and Service Bottoming would describe how I view it; certainly not exclusive service by the Dom to the submissive, no matter how others interpret it.

Call it whatever you wish.  Trivialize to your hearts content.  I'll enjoy mine and you enjoy yours.

TopChuck




In all honesty, I don't try to think about things to the levels people go into on the message boards here. I tend to address issues and problems in the relationship as it occurs.

At times the very balance of a relationship is centered upon having inbalances.(sounds like a paradox).

From my experience things are not always balanced, and I probally would of had a stroke trying to maintain perfect order.





thaprincess -> RE: Equality In the D/s Lifestyle (2/22/2010 4:19:19 PM)

My sub and I are equals in that I don't believe I'm any better than him. He has rights, such as the right to ask a question if he doesn't understand why I want him to do something. He also has the right to make suggestions and give me his opinion on things. But when it comes down to it, I make the final decision. Yes I may listen to what he has to say, but the final decision is mine and mine alone. And that is where his submission comes into play, making our roles equally important (for without his submission I wouldn't be able to dominate and vice versa). But also I have the ultimate say, so I have more power than him because he has chosen to cede his power to me.




Smutmonger -> RE: Equality In the D/s Lifestyle (2/22/2010 6:25:01 PM)

I personally look for a girl with a "team player" attitude.

Rather than just a "player" one.




Andalusite -> RE: Equality In the D/s Lifestyle (2/22/2010 6:35:36 PM)

Lorenzo and Calla, I think that more than her age, the "family" vs. individual needs in influenced in part by the poly vs. monogamy aspect. Both of you have relationships that include more than two people, so *everyone's* needs must be taken into consideration.

Jujubee, I agree that it sounds like you need to feel overpowered and tamed - not physically, but emotionally/intellectually. I don't see anything wrong with that, as long as it works for you and whoever you wind up with. I've had some egalitarian kinky relationships in the past that involved S/M and bondage without either of us having authority over the other.

Lorenzo, you asked about people making decisions when they disagree, if there isn't a power dynamic in place. In those relationships, neither of us really had the "final say" automatically. We were almost always able to find a compromise that worked for both of us, or whoever it mattered to more made that particular decision.




jujubeeMB -> RE: Equality In the D/s Lifestyle (2/23/2010 12:37:59 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: TopChuck

You don't want to submit, you want to be Dommed?  That's it, isn't it?  You want to push against the wall of Dominance and feel that it's so strong that using all your strength you can't knock it down.  When you finally find that you'll feel safe, right?  And, you'll seek until you find that.


When I read your descriptions of your feelings about D/s, I think of Dagney Taggert in "Atlas Shrugged", who kept looking for her intellectual equal.  She couldn't fully submit until she found the strength that allowed her to remain autonomous, within the relationship.  She knelt and he pulled her to her feet alongside him.  She acceded her equality and he gave it back and made her his equal.  Then they both repeated that same process over and over.   That's called "loving".

When you find the person who can do that with you, I daresay, you'll be home, jujubee.



Yes, yes, yes, and yes. You even referenced Dagny Taggart - my subbie mind grew up on "Atlas Shrugged." Read it when I was 14 [:)] Very well put, and thank you for aptly describing my mindset.




Page: <<   < prev  3 4 5 [6] 7   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.0625