RE: Do the Mods have a new "hands-off"policy? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


Level -> RE: Do the Mods have a new "hands-off"policy? (2/16/2010 2:40:14 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: heartcream


quote:

ORIGINAL: AnimusRex

I don't know....maybe ask that Psychonaut guy about the Moderators.


Where has he been lately anyway?
Maybe he is wendydarling?


Great minds think alike, hc.... hmm. Probably not, but it did cross my mind.




pahunkboy -> RE: Do the Mods have a new "hands-off"policy? (2/16/2010 5:25:29 AM)

I would not be so sure.


Every post you make is being monitored- for quality performance.




Jeffff -> RE: Do the Mods have a new "hands-off"policy? (2/16/2010 5:56:50 AM)

I came back for free!

And I am appalled that people other than my self can say almost anything they want!


Jeff




sirsholly -> RE: Do the Mods have a new "hands-off"policy? (2/16/2010 6:01:45 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeffff

I came back for free!

*sucker*

I am still waiting for my check.

Alpha...did ya mail it yet?




Jeffff -> RE: Do the Mods have a new "hands-off"policy? (2/16/2010 6:04:21 AM)

I also came back for the meat loaf...................... My bad


Jeff




sirsholly -> RE: Do the Mods have a new "hands-off"policy? (2/16/2010 6:07:35 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeffff

I also came back for the meat loaf...................... My bad


Jeff

COME AND GET IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!![image]http://www.millan.net/minimations/smileys/hellskitchsmiley2.gif[/image]




ModeratorSixteen -> RE: Do the Mods have a new "hands-off"policy? (2/16/2010 6:09:27 AM)

Admin told me to avoid the meatloaf.Idon't know why.It looks ok.




xxblushesxx -> RE: Do the Mods have a new "hands-off"policy? (2/16/2010 6:11:49 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: ModeratorSixteen

Admin told me to avoid the meatloaf.Idon't know why.It looks ok.


Yeah, that's what XI said...[:-][:o]




Jeffff -> RE: Do the Mods have a new "hands-off"policy? (2/16/2010 6:15:56 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: ModeratorSixteen

Admin told me to avoid the meatloaf.Idon't know why.It looks ok.



That's because it's been varnished. As I understand it, it's more of what a meatloaf MIGHT be, if it was edible.


Jeff




Lucienne -> RE: Do the Mods have a new "hands-off"policy? (2/16/2010 6:17:46 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: AnimusRex

I don't know....maybe ask that Psychonaut guy about the Moderators.


Where has he been lately anyway?


If memory serves, the "smoking cigarettes" thread (which I believe was deleted... sadly) was started the night before his birthday and he wandered off to celebrate. I'd like to think that spending time with his loved ones caused him to re-evaluate the importance of taking a stand against tyranny on the internet and that he re-ordered his priorities and activities accordingly.




Jeffff -> RE: Do the Mods have a new "hands-off"policy? (2/16/2010 6:18:59 AM)

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!


you're funny!


Jeff




sirsholly -> RE: Do the Mods have a new "hands-off"policy? (2/16/2010 6:22:35 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: ModeratorSixteen

Admin told me to avoid the meatloaf.Idon't know why.It looks ok.
HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Y'all hear that??[image]http://www.millan.net/minimations/smileys/pfft2.gif[/image]







xxblushesxx -> RE: Do the Mods have a new "hands-off"policy? (2/16/2010 6:25:55 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: sirsholly

quote:

ORIGINAL: ModeratorSixteen

Admin told me to avoid the meatloaf.Idon't know why.It looks ok.
HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Y'all hear that??[image]http://www.millan.net/minimations/smileys/pfft2.gif[/image]






[sm=afraid.gif] (is it gone yet?!!)




sirsholly -> RE: Do the Mods have a new "hands-off"policy? (2/16/2010 6:25:59 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: xxblushesxx


quote:

ORIGINAL: ModeratorSixteen

Admin told me to avoid the meatloaf.Idon't know why.It looks ok.


Yeah, that's what XI said...[:-][:o]
Not my fault.....she just happened to be swallowing a hunk when she saw that Domi was back.

Personally...i'll miss her ass[image]http://www.millan.net/minimations/smileys/deadthread.gif[/image] me and Pots...yep...




dreamerdreaming -> RE: Do the Mods have a new "hands-off"policy? (2/16/2010 6:28:12 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucienne

quote:

ORIGINAL: AnimusRex

I don't know....maybe ask that Psychonaut guy about the Moderators.


Where has he been lately anyway?


If memory serves, the "smoking cigarettes" thread (which I believe was deleted... sadly) was started the night before his birthday and he wandered off to celebrate. I'd like to think that spending time with his loved ones caused him to re-evaluate the importance of taking a stand against tyranny on the internet and that he re-ordered his priorities and activities accordingly.




No, he came back after that with lots more of the same venom. Some people are a waste of good oxygen. Presumably he was banned.

Thank you, CM mods and admin! [sm=applause.gif][sm=applause.gif][sm=applause.gif]




sirsholly -> RE: Do the Mods have a new "hands-off"policy? (2/16/2010 6:42:22 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: xxblushesxx


quote:

ORIGINAL: sirsholly

quote:

ORIGINAL: ModeratorSixteen

Admin told me to avoid the meatloaf.Idon't know why.It looks ok.
HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Y'all hear that??[image]http://www.millan.net/minimations/smileys/pfft2.gif[/image]






[sm=afraid.gif] (is it gone yet?!!)
the meatloaf, or ModSixteen?




dreamerdreaming -> RE: Do the Mods have a new "hands-off"policy? (2/16/2010 6:52:50 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: EbonyWood

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

<snip>
 We have seen a holocaust denial thread go round in circles for weeks, it's existence merely an opportunity for some to repost the same images.
 
We have seen a 911 denial thread do the same, with no resolution. These threads almost deserve some kind of "Going Nowhere" ruling, if not for the content alone. If they are not added to for a while, the OP just reposts something to put it back on the front page, so to speak.
 
A lot of harm occurs under the guise of free speech. I believe in it, but absolutely?
 
Ironically, I've seen a thread close because a Moderator decided it had "gone long enough folks". I don't disagree with that type of decision, only if it is inconsistent and arbitrary.



I vote for closing those threads, too. They bring down the whole tone of this site. I don't even see a reason for the politics section of the thread, because none of the talk that goes on there changes people's minds. It just turns to anger and insults. Its not productive, and has little or nothing to do with BDSM except that reading an entire thread there would make a cruel punishment. I vote for taking down that whole section. It wasn't there until recently, and the site was fine without it. Why cater to the people who kept posting those pointless political threads?

Admin got the sound turned off of those annoying adds on the sidebar here in like,
.05 milliseconds. That was great! So I hope they can keep up the great job they're doing, stopping a lot of the  nonsense that's been going on. I'm very appreciative of the mods and admin's efforts. They put a lot of time and attention into making this a great place to be.

[:)]





ModeratorSixteen -> RE: Do the Mods have a new "hands-off"policy? (2/16/2010 7:29:44 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: sirsholly

quote:

ORIGINAL: xxblushesxx


quote:

ORIGINAL: sirsholly

quote:

ORIGINAL: ModeratorSixteen

Admin told me to avoid the meatloaf.Idon't know why.It looks ok.
HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Y'all hear that??[image]http://www.millan.net/minimations/smileys/pfft2.gif[/image]






[sm=afraid.gif] (is it gone yet?!!)
the meatloaf, or ModSixteen?



Do you have to ask?Am I really as bad as the meatloaf?




Wolf2Bear -> RE: Do the Mods have a new "hands-off"policy? (2/16/2010 7:48:50 AM)

Well Mod 16...I don't think anything can be as bad as holly's meatloaf. 




RedMagic1 -> RE: Do the Mods have a new "hands-off"policy? (2/16/2010 7:49:30 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: dreamerdreaming
I don't even see a reason for the politics section of the thread, because none of the talk that goes on there changes people's minds. It just turns to anger and insults. Its not productive, and has little or nothing to do with BDSM except that reading an entire thread there would make a cruel punishment. I vote for taking down that whole section. It wasn't there until recently, and the site was fine without it. Why cater to the people who kept posting those pointless political threads?

Those threads, and thread-arguers, existed earlier, and would appear in Off Topic Discussion, and P&RS.  It was actually a user suggestion -- a thread with a lot of yes votes -- that caused creation of the Politics area.  The idea was to separate it out from the other two areas.  It's doing that job pretty well, I think.

Different areas of the boards may be modded differently.  I'm not sure about now, but when both Mod 6 and Mod 11 were active, the Gorean section was modded differently from the rest of Community Discussions, for example.  So the mods may have more patience with neverending threads in Politics than elsewhere.  Alternatively, perhaps more users are reporting problems outside the Politics board, so the mods don't investigate there as much as they do other places.

Hide and ignore sounds like a reasonable strategy to me.




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125