Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

Global Warming -- James Lovelock


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> Global Warming -- James Lovelock Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Global Warming -- James Lovelock - 2/22/2010 8:15:50 AM   
cloudboy


Posts: 7306
Joined: 12/14/2005
Status: offline


James Lovelock predicts a huge jump in the earth's temperatures:

>A new climatic jump, he concludes, will occur within the next few years or decades, and will involve an abrupt increase in average global surface temperature of 9 degrees Celsius—from 15 to 24 degrees Celsius (59 to 75 degrees Fahrenheit). Such a shift, he contends, will trigger the collapse of our global civilization and the near extinction of humanity.<

Such a temperature jump is a minority view in the scientific community, but it still makes me want to move inland around a mountainous area and take up survivalist skills.

>In identifying the root of the climate problem Lovelock coins the word "polyanthroponemia"—a condition in which "humans overpopulate until they do more harm than good." As he explains:

The presence of 7 billion people aiming for first-world comforts...is clearly incompatible with the homeostasis of climate but also with chemistry, biological diversity and the economy of the system.<

This, too, is a valid point -- namely that if climate change does not cause a calamity -- our population explosion will. I like the fact that he coins a word for the tipping point of overpopulation, but I wish he picked something a little less impossible to remember and use in one's daily vocabulary.

Reading such material cannot help but change one's outlook on both the future and the present.
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: Global Warming -- James Lovelock - 2/22/2010 8:29:37 AM   
cuckoldmepls


Posts: 855
Joined: 11/29/2007
Status: offline
Well there is no doubt that mankind has a negative impact on our planet. However, It's pretty obvious to me that we have been in a natural warming period for hundreds if not thousands of years. The icecaps were receding in the early 1900's before the Industrial revolution had even come full strength and cars took over the world. We certainly aren't helping though. It is cause for concern though, and the only practical method to avert it is nuclear power and electric cars.

I believe it won't have the impact that they predict it will though. For example they talk about how rising ocean waters will inundate hundreds of major cities. Well I believe that as much as we irrigate worldwide, which ensures that most of the fresh water will not return to the seas, it will be a neglible rise. Now if we really want to avert a global flood, then perhaps we should build a nuclear desalinizaton plant in a central location along Africa's coast, and then build massive irrigation canals to turn parts of Africa into a Garden of Eden.

Now, doesn't that sound like a good public works project for Africans to do that will help themselves permanently, rather than expect free help from the rest of the world forever. Despite the fact, that they've never heard of birth control or vasectomies.


(in reply to cloudboy)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: Global Warming -- James Lovelock - 2/22/2010 8:32:37 AM   
cuckoldmepls


Posts: 855
Joined: 11/29/2007
Status: offline
By the way, that's how a republican thinks. A democrat just wants to raise taxes each year, and keep giving them money.

(in reply to cuckoldmepls)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: Global Warming -- James Lovelock - 2/22/2010 8:39:26 AM   
cloudboy


Posts: 7306
Joined: 12/14/2005
Status: offline

The Lovelock model is about a tipping point. If he's right, we can all stop worrying about the US national debt, the retirement of the baby boomers, terrorist attacks, and our dreams of more bourgeois luxuries and status.

(in reply to cuckoldmepls)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: Global Warming -- James Lovelock - 2/22/2010 8:40:55 AM   
EbonyWood


Posts: 2044
Joined: 7/8/2005
Status: offline
3 posts (2 by you) to turn a world issue into an opportunity to be bigoted and partisan. 
 
Well done, fuckhead.

(in reply to cuckoldmepls)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: Global Warming -- James Lovelock - 2/22/2010 9:46:21 AM   
DarlingSavage


Posts: 2808
Joined: 9/18/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: cuckoldmepls

Well there is no doubt that mankind has a negative impact on our planet. However, It's pretty obvious to me that we have been in a natural warming period for hundreds if not thousands of years.


I had no idea you had been around for hundreds, much less, thousands of years.

quote:

 The icecaps were receding in the early 1900's before the Industrial revolution had even come full strength and cars took over the world. We certainly aren't helping though. It is cause for concern though, and the only practical method to avert it is nuclear power and electric cars.


Citations?

quote:

I believe it won't have the impact that they predict it will though. For example they talk about how rising ocean waters will inundate hundreds of major cities. Well I believe that as much as we irrigate worldwide, which ensures that most of the fresh water will not return to the seas, it will be a neglible rise. Now if we really want to avert a global flood, then perhaps we should build a nuclear desalinizaton plant in a central location along Africa's coast, and then build massive irrigation canals to turn parts of Africa into a Garden of Eden.


Africa has already come up with a far better solution to energy concerns.  They are building solar energy plants.  Far more sustainable than nuclear energy.  Furthermore, hasn't man's attempts at changing the environment in which we live gotten us into enough trouble already?  We need to STOP trying to make the environment adapt to us.  That's backwards.  We should be striving to adapt to the environments in which we live.   All of our so called solutions to Mother Nature's "mishaps" have just come back to bite us in the derrriere.  Mainly because we didn't take the time to understand fully the environment in which we lived and the natural cycles which occurred in those environs.  Seasons, storms, cycles, ecosystems, the planet, all work together in a way that makes this planet habitable.  It's when we interfere with those processes that we begin to disrupt Nature's delicate balance. 

quote:

Now, doesn't that sound like a good public works project for Africans to do that will help themselves permanently, rather than expect free help from the rest of the world forever. Despite the fact, that they've never heard of birth control or vasectomies.


This is just a bigoted statement and merely reveals the depth and breadth of your ignorance.

< Message edited by DarlingSavage -- 2/22/2010 10:43:35 AM >

(in reply to cuckoldmepls)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: Global Warming -- James Lovelock - 2/22/2010 10:03:50 AM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline
...one topic I am pretty tired of.

I am sure it is jsut me.

(in reply to DarlingSavage)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: Global Warming -- James Lovelock - 2/22/2010 10:36:55 AM   
DarlingSavage


Posts: 2808
Joined: 9/18/2009
Status: offline
I could never get tired of this.  It gives me a chance to exercise what I know on the subject.

(in reply to pahunkboy)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: Global Warming -- James Lovelock - 2/22/2010 10:59:45 AM   
cloudboy


Posts: 7306
Joined: 12/14/2005
Status: offline

Lovelock considers the only viable alternative energy source to cut CO2 quantities in the air to be be nuclear power.

(in reply to DarlingSavage)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: Global Warming -- James Lovelock - 2/22/2010 11:20:37 AM   
DarlingSavage


Posts: 2808
Joined: 9/18/2009
Status: offline
Solar energy is a viable source, I'm pretty sure.  But energy really isn't my field, so I couldn't make a conclusive statement on this.  However, there are problems with nuclear energy that remain to be corrected, such as waste.  Nuclear fusion was thought to be a new source of clean energy, but my professors were saying this may not be the case after all.  I don't know about you, but given the choice to live next to an energy plant that produced energy from the sun and one that was nuclear, I think I would opt to live next to the solar plant. 

James Lovelock sounds like an interesting guy though, and I wouldn't mind doing a little further research into his accomplishments.  I don't see where he stated that nuclear energy was the only viable option for depleting levels of CO2 in the atmosphere.  It also depends on when these statements were made and what technology was available at that time.  It appears that he only endorses nuclear energy, however, he doesn't seem to say anything about other sources of alternative energy.

< Message edited by DarlingSavage -- 2/22/2010 11:30:47 AM >

(in reply to cloudboy)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: Global Warming -- James Lovelock - 2/22/2010 12:21:14 PM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: cloudboy


Lovelock considers the only viable alternative energy source to cut CO2 quantities in the air to be be nuclear power.

Lovelock must not be keeping up on the technology. Wind and solar are much better choices than nuclear right now and will only get better as the technologies improve. Most homes and businesses could be energy independent by putting up a couple of vertical axis wind turbines, a bank of solar panels and a battery system.

(in reply to cloudboy)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: Global Warming -- James Lovelock - 2/22/2010 2:50:48 PM   
popeye1250


Posts: 18104
Joined: 1/27/2006
From: New Hampshire
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: cloudboy



James Lovelock predicts a huge jump in the earth's temperatures:

>A new climatic jump, he concludes, will occur within the next few years or decades, and will involve an abrupt increase in average global surface temperature of 9 degrees Celsius—from 15 to 24 degrees Celsius (59 to 75 degrees Fahrenheit). Such a shift, he contends, will trigger the collapse of our global civilization and the near extinction of humanity.<

Such a temperature jump is a minority view in the scientific community, but it still makes me want to move inland around a mountainous area and take up survivalist skills.

>In identifying the root of the climate problem Lovelock coins the word "polyanthroponemia"—a condition in which "humans overpopulate until they do more harm than good." As he explains:

The presence of 7 billion people aiming for first-world comforts...is clearly incompatible with the homeostasis of climate but also with chemistry, biological diversity and the economy of the system.<

This, too, is a valid point -- namely that if climate change does not cause a calamity -- our population explosion will. I like the fact that he coins a word for the tipping point of overpopulation, but I wish he picked something a little less impossible to remember and use in one's daily vocabulary.

Reading such material cannot help but change one's outlook on both the future and the present.


Cloudboy, and Jesus "could" return in the next few years or decades too and kick some ass and help out with that overpopulation problem.
These "warmer zombies" are mentally ill. If you want to listen to them that's up to you.

_____________________________

"But Your Honor, this is not a Jury of my Peers, these people are all decent, honest, law-abiding citizens!"

(in reply to cloudboy)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: Global Warming -- James Lovelock - 2/22/2010 2:52:32 PM   
cloudboy


Posts: 7306
Joined: 12/14/2005
Status: offline
quote:

Lovelock must not be keeping up on the technology. Wind and solar are much better choices than nuclear right now and will only get better as the technologies improve. Most homes and businesses could be energy independent by putting up a couple of vertical axis wind turbines, a bank of solar panels and a battery system.


Solar and wind power won't steer global temperatures away from his prediction. According to him, not enough power is generated from those sources to meet the energy demands of industrialized nations. This is especially true in the US.

What he's really saying is that Planet Earth cannot be steered clear of the icebergs ahead, so cognitively speaking the question remaining is: what happens after the tipping point is breached.

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: Global Warming -- James Lovelock - 2/22/2010 4:00:03 PM   
DarlingSavage


Posts: 2808
Joined: 9/18/2009
Status: offline
quote:

Solar and wind power won't steer global temperatures away from his prediction. According to him, not enough power is generated from those sources to meet the energy demands of industrialized nations. This is especially true in the US.

What he's really saying is that Planet Earth cannot be steered clear of the icebergs ahead, so cognitively speaking the question remaining is: what happens after the tipping point is breached.


Yes, that's been true in the past, but now, the technology is better. We're able to harness much more energy from these sources than we ever could before in the past. Hence, the question as to when he made this statement regarding nuclear energy.

(in reply to cloudboy)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: Global Warming -- James Lovelock - 2/22/2010 4:14:59 PM   
servantforuse


Posts: 6363
Joined: 3/8/2006
Status: offline
Solar panels will never be enough to power a large plant.

(in reply to DarlingSavage)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: Global Warming -- James Lovelock - 2/22/2010 4:31:13 PM   
DarlingSavage


Posts: 2808
Joined: 9/18/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: servantforuse

Solar panels will never be enough to power a large plant.


And you're credentials are????

(in reply to servantforuse)
Profile   Post #: 16
RE: Global Warming -- James Lovelock - 2/22/2010 4:36:02 PM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: servantforuse

Solar panels will never be enough to power a large plant.

Maybe but probably not. Solar in combination with wind and a good battery system can do it right now.

Here's a 4KW wind turbine which would work as a multiple installation on a factory roof to provide significant power.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_jUtRipZM_A

Add solar panels on the rest of the roof and you could power most plants. The size of the plant actually would work in the favor of solar as it would mean more roof top for more panels.

(in reply to servantforuse)
Profile   Post #: 17
RE: Global Warming -- James Lovelock - 2/22/2010 7:58:56 PM   
stella41b


Posts: 4258
Joined: 10/16/2007
From: SW London (UK)
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: cuckoldmepls

Now, doesn't that sound like a good public works project for Africans to do that will help themselves permanently, rather than expect free help from the rest of the world forever. Despite the fact, that they've never heard of birth control or vasectomies.



Yet another gem here, from someone who has diarrhea when it comes to words but is constipated when it comes to thinking.


_____________________________

CM's Resident Lyricist
also Facebook
http://stella.baker.tripod.com/
50NZpoints
Q2
Simply Q

(in reply to cuckoldmepls)
Profile   Post #: 18
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> Global Warming -- James Lovelock Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094