Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Female Supremacy - Married Male Slaves - Can of Worms


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Female Supremacy - Married Male Slaves - Can of Worms Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Female Supremacy - Married Male Slaves - Can of Worms - 3/29/2006 6:07:08 PM   
Aimtoplease101


Posts: 319
Joined: 2/8/2006
From: San Diego, California
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterFireMaam

quote:

ORIGINAL: newdombbw

On one hand, I figure - if they're not with me, they'll be with someone else.



This might very well be true. However, the actions and choices of another do not have to influence your moral standings in the least. If you have a problem with it, and it sounds like you do, don't do it.

Fire



Under the OP's alternative rationale (quoted above), society would devolve quickly to the lowest common denominator.

Regards,
ATP

_____________________________

Pleasing you pleases me.

(in reply to MasterFireMaam)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: Female Supremacy - Married Male Slaves - Can of Worms - 3/29/2006 6:11:30 PM   
MizSuz


Posts: 1881
Joined: 1/1/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LuckyAlbatross

However, I find it odd that you believe in female supremacy but allow a man to get what he wants from another woman and you only get it when the wife allows (if he's cheating).



See, that's the rub for me.  I mean, there are a bazillion ways to manifest a d/s relationship so it's possible to build a very rewarding relationship with a married man that doesn't necessarily cause him to break any promises within the framework of his relationship.  Takes clarity and good boundaries, but it's doable.

However, my objection to married persons as personals, as opposed to being clients, is that the ratio of return to investment isn't good enough for me.  I mean, he's married so it's never going to go sexual.  If he's married I'm going to come in second at best, more likely third.  If there are kids then my place in the hierarchy of priority is lower still.  He's not going to be with me on holidays.  He's probably not going to come in the middle of the night if I need to go to the hospital or whatever else one might find them self doing in the middle of the night.  If he's a man of some means we may occasionally travel together, but if he's inundated with mortgage, car payments, orthadonture payments, soccer uniforms and clarinets and he saves to go on vacation with his family once every year or so, chances are very likely I won't be the person he goes on vacation with.  If he's married he may not want to be seen in very public places so he probably won't attend a lot of functions with me.  During the high growing season, when it seems that mowing the yard once a week isn't enough, whose yard do you think is most likely to be neglected?

Most married men are only available on a basis that could constitute a very nice professional relationship, but in general they are not in a position to prioritize me in a way that I would find acceptable.

Why would I want to compromise?

_____________________________

“The more you love, the more you can love—and the more intensely you love. Nor is there any limit on how many you can love. If a person had time enough, he could love all of that majority who are decent and just.”
- Robert Heinlein

(in reply to LuckyAlbatross)
Profile   Post #: 22
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Female Supremacy - Married Male Slaves - Can of Worms Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.047