RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE

RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

HouseEros -> RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE (2/26/2010 5:23:22 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail washington times did not question anything. an op ed piece detailing a guy that wants to have congress investigate some dubious and oft repeated claims with no backing. more paper and washers. Quoted for truth. That said, I suspect the whole truth was never provided to the public. There are several inconsistencies within the facts that (imo) conspiracy theorists are latching onto to claim something more.

pahunkboy -> RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE (2/26/2010 5:25:51 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: AnimusRex quote: ORIGINAL: pahunkboy why do these threads always end up in disrepair? Yes, good question! Why can't we just have a good civil discussion as to why the Secret Zionist Operated Government planted explosives and mysteriously vanished 4 fully loaded jet aircraft into the Twilight Zone, and hoodwinked hundreds of videographers and photographers and thousands of eyewitnesses into thinking that airplances crashed into the World Trade Center, while Larry Silverman spoke into a voice recorder (that only PA heard) and said "pull it" then afterward fooled teams of hundreds or thousands of firefighters, forensic experts, engineers and safety experts into thinking it was jet fuel that brought the buildings down? And yet somehow failed to pull the wool over the eyes of crack experts on teh Intertubes, who cleverly saw black smoke when there should have been white smoke, and saw throught the clever plot by the Illuminati and Jooz and One World Government. Why must these threads always be ruined??? How do you feel about paying AIG? ....your retirement is a good down payment on the massive fraud that 7 represents. WMDs- 2 wars- trillions. sure it is all funny until someone pokes an eye out.

rulemylife -> RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE (2/26/2010 5:26:25 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: SL4V3M4YB3 quote: ORIGINAL: Real0ne obfuscators. sort of like throwing darts and hitting the bullseye on the other guys target then claiming they were on point because they hit a bullseye. not much anyone can do in those situations and every board has them. An admission at last I thought we'd never get there, like blood from a stone that was. SL4, keep this quiet, because the truthers are watching me, even as we speak, and I fear for my safety. Don't tell anyone I told you this, but if you stop encouraging them maybe they'll go away.

SL4V3M4YB3 -> RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE (2/26/2010 5:28:10 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: rulemylife SL4, keep this quiet, because the truthers are watching me, even as we speak, and I fear for my safety. Hide in a library they'll never find you there.[:D]

Politesub53 -> RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE (2/26/2010 5:29:29 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Rule Edited for reason of stupidity. I am glad I could help. [8D]

Real0ne -> RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE (2/26/2010 5:35:50 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: HouseEros quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail washington times did not question anything. an op ed piece detailing a guy that wants to have congress investigate some dubious and oft repeated claims with no backing. more paper and washers. Quoted for truth. That said, I suspect the whole truth was never provided to the public. There are several inconsistencies within the facts that (imo) conspiracy theorists are latching onto to claim something more. ah but that is a medai label yo usee. We have to keep in mind who the conspiracy theorists REALLY are here. There was a guy that got up on the podium and claimed 19 evil ones CONSPIRED to attack our freedom, (complete bullshit but it really sounded good to the flag wavers!) Now you take hunk rule and me well we are the anti conspiracy theorists and debunk the governments conspiracy theory. Just wqanted to set that straight/.

rulemylife -> RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE (2/26/2010 5:36:58 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: AnimusRex And yet somehow failed to pull the wool over the eyes of crack experts.... Well finally, an explanation for these threads that makes sense. Hope this helps some of you: 24 Hour Crack Cocaine Helplines - Call a Crack Cocaine Hotline Now

pahunkboy -> RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE (2/26/2010 5:42:26 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Real0ne quote: ORIGINAL: HouseEros quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail washington times did not question anything. an op ed piece detailing a guy that wants to have congress investigate some dubious and oft repeated claims with no backing. more paper and washers. Quoted for truth. That said, I suspect the whole truth was never provided to the public. There are several inconsistencies within the facts that (imo) conspiracy theorists are latching onto to claim something more. ah but that is a medai label yo usee. We have to keep in mind who the conspiracy theorists REALLY are here. There was a guy that got up on the podium and claimed 19 evil ones CONSPIRED to attack our freedom, (complete bullshit but it really sounded good to the flag wavers!) Now you take hunk rule and me well we are the anti conspiracy theorists and debunk the governments conspiracy theory. Just wqanted to set that straight/. I hope it is not too late to have a grand jury investigation.

Real0ne -> RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE (2/26/2010 5:46:28 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: AnimusRex quote: ORIGINAL: pahunkboy why do these threads always end up in disrepair? Yes, good question! Why can't we just have a good civil discussion well its most likely because the people with that have the least amount to offer an intelligent discussion always come on here and say shit like: as to why the Secret Zionist Operated Government planted explosives and mysteriously vanished 4 fully loaded jet aircraft into the Twilight Zone, and hoodwinked hundreds of videographers and photographers and thousands of eyewitnesses into thinking that airplances crashed into the World Trade Center, w hile Larry Silverman spoke into a voice recorder (that only PA heard) and said "pull it"t hen afterward fooled teams of hundreds or thousands of firefighters, forensic experts, engineers and safety experts into thinking it was jet fuel that brought the buildings down? And yet somehow failed to pull the wool over the eyes of crack experts on teh Intertubes, who cleverly saw black smoke when there should have been white smoke, and saw throught the clever plot by the Illuminati and Jooz and One World Government. Why must these threads always be ruined??? now when people approach a problem as governed and scientific as that why there is only one appropriate response that rises to such a glorious occasion! [image]local://upfiles/59055/812EB705B4A94BB1A7F856CF2247EC39.jpg[/image] everything else dubyas administration did was a lie but 911 well that was the truth!

Rule -> RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE (2/26/2010 5:52:53 PM)
I have been collecting the pictures that you posted in recent threads, RealOne. Thank you.

pahunkboy -> RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE (2/26/2010 5:53:49 PM)
the whole bases was to invade Iraq.. and supposedly we were going to "bring the troops home". why would anyone trust much the govt official line? the govt lies and kills for big corporations... and the very people who don't want to face it are being robbed of their retirement.

SL4V3M4YB3 -> RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE (2/26/2010 5:55:20 PM)
If it was all about Iraq then surely Iraq would have come first no?

Real0ne -> RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE (2/26/2010 6:19:23 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: pahunkboy the whole bases was to invade Iraq.. and supposedly we were going to "bring the troops home". why would anyone trust much the govt official line? the govt lies and kills for big corporations... and the very people who don't want to face it are being robbed of their retirement. the US IS A CORPORATION! http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=3089415

thompsonx -> RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE (2/26/2010 7:14:51 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: luckydawg I learned you are a coward who won't back up your assertions and insults..... Irony of the first order

JonnieBoy -> RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE (2/27/2010 12:06:54 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: SL4V3M4YB3 quote: ORIGINAL: JonnieBoy And possibly why he appears to some (so I'm told) to be a Twat ? I sure hope SL4 is the first 3 characters of his postcode, it would be a shame if he were to disappoint. Silly pointless mind games on your behalf. There is an obvious remedy that anyone can take if they don't like reading what I write. I didn't force your head in front of your monitor and glue your eyelids to your forehead. I don't care about your opinion of me or anyone else's that you may be getting your information from, being in the company of people that don't like me is no great feat. Hey Eeeengleeesh ... You missed the point ... tried picking on the wrong guy and made yourself look a twat (so I'm told) Par for the course, of course SL4. Pirate

pahunkboy -> RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE (2/27/2010 5:17:27 AM)
and then Larry said "pull it" 7 fell free fall when no plane what so ever hit it. same guy collected 2x the insurance as he claimed it was 2 attacks not one. so he double dipped- from AIG which you bailed out once and will bail out again. YOUR money pays this- plus trillions for the war on terror. YOUR retirement is paying this.

pahunkboy -> RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE (2/27/2010 5:19:19 AM)
I want to thank those who question #7. You are true patriots. We can not let this fraud stand.

Real0ne -> RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE (2/27/2010 8:58:27 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: pahunkboy I want to thank those who question #7. You are true patriots. We can not let this fraud stand. Hunk, some people are physics bankrupt. Its amazing how many people come out here and call themselves engineers when they dont know which side of a calculator to use. This is what should have happened to #2, but thats the real world! Cant have that! [image]local://upfiles/59055/8CA5F83C7CF047FF96A4883905708529.jpg[/image]

mnottertail -> RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE (2/27/2010 8:59:39 AM)
it should have blown up into mexico?

pahunkboy -> RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE (2/27/2010 9:02:37 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Real0ne quote: ORIGINAL: pahunkboy I want to thank those who question #7. You are true patriots. We can not let this fraud stand. Hunk, some people are physics bankrupt. Its amazing how many people come out here and call themselves engineers when they dont know which side of a calculator to use. This is what should have happened to #2, but thats the real world! Cant have that! [image]local://upfiles/59055/8CA5F83C7CF047FF96A4883905708529.jpg[/image] That is alot more realistic then the free fall we seen when 7 was imploded. and no plane what-s0-ever hit that building.

Page: << < prev 8 9 [10] 11 12 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.0625