RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


luckydawg -> RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE (2/26/2010 12:55:13 PM)

Mnot, I am starting to think more and more, that realone (and his whole movement) is just a front for fishing for idiots, who lack critical thinking skills. If someone is dumb enought to accept what he is saying, they are rubes, ripe for all kinds of scams. It was sad to watch Pahunk slide into his orbit, they ended up convicning him to change his meds on his own. Brain and Thompson x are halfway there also.




mnottertail -> RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE (2/26/2010 1:01:21 PM)

Be sure to catch the washers and paper rings video, it is some hard hitting physics contained in it.

Its purported explanation of the impossibility of the towers falling based on its obvious phyics simile is nearly as educational as a video relating how to make jello from chainsaws.





Real0ne -> RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE (2/26/2010 1:01:30 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

because they are fucking dead, first of all, and second, there is nothing to talk about, nothing to expose....read the fucking links I gave you by firefighters for firefighters.



but but but ron I read the links and it does nore to shoot you in the foot than anything else like most of your posts.

I will even be kind and give you a point you can obfuscate and have some fun with.


Colour, location and amount of smoke can provide valuable clues to the fire’s size, intensity and fuel.

Hitler would love these new buildings eh?  LOL
Hydrogen cyanide is formed when plastic products, such as the PVC pipe used in residential construction, burn.

A fire involving petroleum products will produce large quantities of black, rolling smoke that rises in a vertical column.

Virtually all solid materials will emit a white smoke when first heated.

There you go^^^^^^^^^^^^^ make this your central focus and claim it takes fire an hour to heat a material hot enough to burn.....  When I seen that I knew precisely what you had in mind with that link!  BWAHAHA

This white smoke is actually moisture.

Yes until it gets up to temp with takes ahem, "seconds"  not many minutes as in an hour like the wtc burned with the smoke coming from the same place the whole time.


As the material dries out and breaks down, the colour of the smoke will change. Natural materials will change to tan or brown while plastics and painted surfaces will turn to grey. Grey is a result of moisture and hydrocarbons (black) mixing. All materials will eventually off gas a black smoke; flame contact will cause materials to give off black smoke right away. 


but then I digress.  You know this all started when I posted the difference between a jet plowing into the ground and an alleged jet plowing into a building.

you know the real plane crash was dense black smoke and the fake one was gray.

So back to the begining here is the color of the alleged plane that supposedly went into the north tower


[image]local://upfiles/59055/3960B770424A47BB9E31B0C318F950B9.jpg[/image]




Real0ne -> RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE (2/26/2010 1:03:36 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail


quote:

ORIGINAL: luckydawg

hmmm, so real one is so secure in his logic, he ducks a question...



ld, Real0ne is the disappearing hole.


Well rex never came back with a rebuttal to my rebuttal about his comments, lucky thomson had to educate you about what a naturally aspirated fire was and that is like sorry but 101 as basic as it gets.

Rond didnt want to talk about all those damn explosions that you can see ripping the fuck out of the towers so he changed the topic to smoke.

Thats ok because we can always get back to all those explosions and give you all a chance to duck out again.  :)


and here is a picture of a real plane going in


[image]local://upfiles/59055/456AF4F060684723B2CA6FB95E556FFE.jpg[/image]




SL4V3M4YB3 -> RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE (2/26/2010 1:09:01 PM)

Dust and smoke two different things, anyway.




MstrPBK -> RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE (2/26/2010 1:11:10 PM)

Yse dust and smoke ARE two different things

MstrPBK
St .Paul, MN USA




Real0ne -> RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE (2/26/2010 1:13:48 PM)

they conveniently discount the sequence




mnottertail -> RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE (2/26/2010 1:14:21 PM)

NO, I gave you a link by firefighters for firefighters that explained explosions in some great and scientific detail but since it would contradict your untutored quibbles you chose not to read it.

your plane thing there, where is the building with the open central core acting as a chimney in that picture, , with a surround that would cause much more of the unburned gas to remain captive and burn?

Oh, I see, more washers and paper rings.

Not Alike whatsoever.

learn the phrase, in camera, or better yet, in situ.

Back in gradeschool they used to have these tests; a is like b because, or even give you multiple choice.

I can see you did real fuckin poorly on those.

Further, I see no plane in that picture. I see a burning and unsubstantiated mass that cannot in and of itself be identified as a plane with certitude.

How is an american quarter like an ugandan shilling? (hint: other than they are a form of currency, they aint)




luckydawg -> RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE (2/26/2010 1:16:27 PM)

So real ducked the question by hiding behind thompson. So your a bitch as well as a dumbass.






Real0ne -> RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE (2/26/2010 1:21:41 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

NO, I gave you a link by firefighters for firefighters that explained explosions in some great and scientific detail but since it would contradict your untutored quibbles you chose not to read it.

your plane thing there, where is the building with the open central core acting as a chimney in that picture, , with a surround that would cause much more of the unburned gas to remain captive and burn?

Oh, I see, more washers and paper rings.

Not Alike whatsoever.

learn the phrase, in camera, or better yet, in situ.

Back in gradeschool they used to have these tests; a is like b because, or even give you multiple choice.

I can see you did real fuckin poorly on those.

Further, I see no plane in that picture. I see a burning and unsubstantiated mass that cannot in and of itself be identified as a plane with certitude.

How is an american quarter like an ugandan shilling? (hint: other than they are a form of currency, they aint)


ron if you do not recognize that from the video  of the first alleged hit then maybe this is not a topic you want to be involved in.

currency, watermelons, which hand you wipe your butt with really does nothing to aid in making your point.

Unfortunately for you I posted excerpts from your firemans to firemans link and it shot more holes in your foot.

So do you want to talk about currency now?  Another one of my all time favorite topics!  We can make a thread for it!




mnottertail -> RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE (2/26/2010 1:24:37 PM)

you shot no holes at all, you agreed wholeheartedly with it.




Real0ne -> RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE (2/26/2010 1:26:18 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: luckydawg

Mnot, I am starting to think more and more, that realone (and his whole movement) is just a front for fishing for idiots, who lack critical thinking skills. If someone is dumb enought to accept what he is saying, they are rubes, ripe for all kinds of scams. It was sad to watch Pahunk slide into his orbit, they ended up convicning him to change his meds on his own. Brain and Thompson x are halfway there also.



quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne
quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx
quote:

ORIGINAL: luckydawg

but it wasn't a naturly aspirated fire. The massive clouds of smoke sucked an equal amount of air into the fire, right? You do agree with that, right?



Do you have a clue what "naturally aspirated" means?



not if he is contesting that.


Hey hunkman take a look at this!

I am serious we so have these government sanctioned conspiracy theorists by the balls! 

I mean like clamped in a vice so tight that to deny its a demolition makes them all look like total fools.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u2hf4b43aQs&feature=player_embedded

Check out this video and again break out the crying towels! LMAO




yeh but lucky they have something going for them.......They understand what a naturally aspirated fire is.   Thats sort of fire 101 and really how can anyone who does not understand fire 101 remotely be taken seriously on this subject.

I think you should give them credit for that dont you?

Maybe this is more your area of expertise:

Check out those explosions! 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u2hf4b43aQs&feature=player_embedded

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W5sljqUnUQs&feature=response_watch

those rock dont they?  Check out the blast waves!  Seriously though have you ever seen a 4th of july that had more fireworks than the wtc demolition?  I know I havent.

Anyway its what we were talking about before ron felt he could get better mileage from the smoke argument.





Real0ne -> RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE (2/26/2010 1:28:53 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

you shot no holes at all, you agreed wholeheartedly with it.


Hey ron....

when someone argues with you about a point and that means they do not agree with you.

Honestly I would not josh you on that.

Game over you lose but thanks for playing!




Justme696 -> RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE (2/26/2010 1:29:04 PM)

this conspiracy stuff seem as american as a big mac.
I wonder why it is so popular overthere.




mnottertail -> RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE (2/26/2010 1:31:40 PM)

Convection is the primary principle that controls the spread of smoke, heat and toxic gases within a compartment. Heated gases expand, becoming less dense than cooler gases. As a result, the hot gases produced by a fire in a closed room rise to the ceiling (thermal layer) and spread outward, displacing cooler air and pushing it toward the floor. Smoke, heat and toxic gases will spread horizontally along the ceiling until they find an opening that allows them to reach a higher level. They will then flow upward through the vertical opening until they reach another horizontal obstruction. At that point, they will again spread out horizontally and bank down as they accumulate. This process is called mushrooming.


Convection, the flow of heated gases produced by the fire, is one of the primary mechanisms of fire spread. The gases may be hot enough to ignite combustible materials along their path. In addition to igniting combustible materials, the hot gases, smoke and other products of combustion can explode.

In many cases, these products of combustion may include a rich supply of partially burned fuels that are hot enough to ignite but lack sufficient oxygen to support combustion. If these products are mixed with fresh air, the atmosphere itself can ignite or, in an extreme situation, explode.

Try this simple experiment. Light a candle (an emergency candle works best). Let it burn for at least two minutes. Now, light a match and then, as you blow out the candle, bring the lighted match close to the white smoke trailing from the wick. You should see the white smoke ignite and jump the flame back onto the wick. This proves there is enough unburned fuel (gas) in the smoke to ignite. You may not think this is a big a deal but consider this same experiment with 100 times the smoke volume. (See sidebar, below.)


SMOKE EXPLOSION
Following is a brief description of a smoke explosion according to Paul Grimwood at firetactics.com :
■ A smoke explosion can involve cold smoke;
■ A smoke explosion involves a contained layer of flammable smoke already existing within its limits of flammability;
■ All that is needed is an ignition source;
■ A rich-mix of superheated fire gases in smoke may auto-ignite';
■ All that is needed in this case is AIR – this is not truly reflective of a smoke explosion;
■ A smoke explosion usually causes structural damage caused by pressure waves whereas the lesser event, termed flash fire, does not;
■ When a flashover occurs, there is generally plenty of smoke accompanying it;
■ Smoke explosions usually occur with smoke/gas/air pre-mix below 650 C for if the temperature is higher than this the gases will most likely auto-ignite.



Typically, firefighters view smoke as light or heavy. This may be adequate for an initial size up report but it is not descriptive enough when trying to discover what is going on with a fire. The colour, location and amount of smoke can provide valuable clues to the fire’s size, intensity and fuel.

Thin, light-coloured smoke moving lazily out of the building usually indicates a small fire involving ordinary combustibles. Thick, dark grey smoke “pushing” out of a structure, suggests a larger, more intense fire. A fire involving petroleum products will produce large quantities of black, rolling smoke that rises in a vertical column.

Smoke movement is a good indicator of the fire’s temperature. A very hot fire will produce smoke that moves quickly, rolling and forcing its way out through an opening. The hotter the fire, the faster the smoke will move. Cooler smoke moves more slowly and gently. On a cool, damp day with very little wind, this type of smoke might hang low to the ground (smoke inversion).

The four attributes of smoke – volume, velocity, density and colour – must be analyzed.

Smoke volume is an indicator of the amount of fuels that are off gassing within a given space. In itself, smoke volume tells very little about the fire.

The speed at which smoke leaves a building is referred to as velocity. Smoke velocity is an indicator of pressure that has built up within the compartment.

Smoke movement caused by heat (convection) will typically rise and slow gradually after it leaves the building. If the velocity of smoke leaving an opening is agitated or turbulent, then rapid fire progress is likely to occur. In these cases, the structure must be ventilated and cooled.

The NFPA definition for backdraft is the explosive or rapid burning of heated gases that occurs when oxygen is introduced into a building that has not been properly ventilated and has a depleted supply of oxygen due to fire. (Burklin, NFPA 1980)

More than half of the indicators warning of potential backdraft have to do with smoke: smoke puffing at intervals from the building (appearance of breathing); pressurized smoke coming from small cracks; black smoke becoming dense, grey yellow smoke-stained windows.

Incomplete burning causes smoke density (smoke thickness). The greater the smoke density the more likely a hostile fire event, such as flashover or rapid fire spread, can occur. In essence, the thicker the smoke, the more spectacular the flashover or fire spread.

For single-fuel fires, smoke colour may indicate the type of material burning. In typical residential and commercial fires, it is rare that a single fuel source is emitting smoke. Smoke colour can, however, tell the firefighter what stage of burning is taking place or where the fire is within a building.

these are some issues you left out in your cherry picking that would disfavor your weltanshuuang




wittynamehere -> RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE (2/26/2010 1:31:59 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Justme696

this conspiracy stuff seem as american as a big mac.
I wonder why it is so popular overthere.

It's where a lot of the money and power are, so it makes sense that's where a lot of conspiracies unfold.




Justme696 -> RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE (2/26/2010 1:34:44 PM)

mmm.....yes..that could be it.
thank you




Real0ne -> RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE (2/26/2010 1:37:12 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Convection is the primary principle that controls the spread of smoke, heat and toxic gases within a compartment. Heated gases expand, becoming less dense than cooler gases. As a result, the hot gases produced by a fire in a closed room rise to the ceiling (thermal layer) and spread outward, displacing cooler air and pushing it toward the floor. Smoke, heat and toxic gases will spread horizontally along the ceiling until they find an opening that allows them to reach a higher level. They will then flow upward through the vertical opening until they reach another horizontal obstruction. At that point, they will again spread out horizontally and bank down as they accumulate. This process is called mushrooming.


Convection, the flow of heated gases produced by the fire, is one of the primary mechanisms of fire spread. The gases may be hot enough to ignite combustible materials along their path. In addition to igniting combustible materials, the hot gases, smoke and other products of combustion can explode.

In many cases, these products of combustion may include a rich supply of partially burned fuels that are hot enough to ignite but lack sufficient oxygen to support combustion. If these products are mixed with fresh air, the atmosphere itself can ignite or, in an extreme situation, explode.

Try this simple experiment. Light a candle (an emergency candle works best). Let it burn for at least two minutes. Now, light a match and then, as you blow out the candle, bring the lighted match close to the white smoke trailing from the wick. You should see the white smoke ignite and jump the flame back onto the wick. This proves there is enough unburned fuel (gas) in the smoke to ignite. You may not think this is a big a deal but consider this same experiment with 100 times the smoke volume. (See sidebar, below.)


SMOKE EXPLOSION
Following is a brief description of a smoke explosion according to Paul Grimwood at firetactics.com :
■ A smoke explosion can involve cold smoke;
■ A smoke explosion involves a contained layer of flammable smoke already existing within its limits of flammability;
■ All that is needed is an ignition source;
■ A rich-mix of superheated fire gases in smoke may auto-ignite';
■ All that is needed in this case is AIR – this is not truly reflective of a smoke explosion;
■ A smoke explosion usually causes structural damage caused by pressure waves whereas the lesser event, termed flash fire, does not;
■ When a flashover occurs, there is generally plenty of smoke accompanying it;
■ Smoke explosions usually occur with smoke/gas/air pre-mix below 650 C for if the temperature is higher than this the gases will most likely auto-ignite.



Typically, firefighters view smoke as light or heavy. This may be adequate for an initial size up report but it is not descriptive enough when trying to discover what is going on with a fire. The colour, location and amount of smoke can provide valuable clues to the fire’s size, intensity and fuel.

Thin, light-coloured smoke moving lazily out of the building usually indicates a small fire involving ordinary combustibles. Thick, dark grey smoke “pushing” out of a structure, suggests a larger, more intense fire. A fire involving petroleum products will produce large quantities of black, rolling smoke that rises in a vertical column.

Smoke movement is a good indicator of the fire’s temperature. A very hot fire will produce smoke that moves quickly, rolling and forcing its way out through an opening. The hotter the fire, the faster the smoke will move. Cooler smoke moves more slowly and gently. On a cool, damp day with very little wind, this type of smoke might hang low to the ground (smoke inversion).

The four attributes of smoke – volume, velocity, density and colour – must be analyzed.

Smoke volume is an indicator of the amount of fuels that are off gassing within a given space. In itself, smoke volume tells very little about the fire.

The speed at which smoke leaves a building is referred to as velocity. Smoke velocity is an indicator of pressure that has built up within the compartment.

Smoke movement caused by heat (convection) will typically rise and slow gradually after it leaves the building. If the velocity of smoke leaving an opening is agitated or turbulent, then rapid fire progress is likely to occur. In these cases, the structure must be ventilated and cooled.

The NFPA definition for backdraft is the explosive or rapid burning of heated gases that occurs when oxygen is introduced into a building that has not been properly ventilated and has a depleted supply of oxygen due to fire. (Burklin, NFPA 1980)

More than half of the indicators warning of potential backdraft have to do with smoke: smoke puffing at intervals from the building (appearance of breathing); pressurized smoke coming from small cracks; black smoke becoming dense, grey yellow smoke-stained windows.

Incomplete burning causes smoke density (smoke thickness). The greater the smoke density the more likely a hostile fire event, such as flashover or rapid fire spread, can occur. In essence, the thicker the smoke, the more spectacular the flashover or fire spread.

For single-fuel fires, smoke colour may indicate the type of material burning. In typical residential and commercial fires, it is rare that a single fuel source is emitting smoke. Smoke colour can, however, tell the firefighter what stage of burning is taking place or where the fire is within a building.

these are some issues you left out in your cherry picking that would disfavor your weltanshuuang




yes ron but note that I already responded to that article and picked out the points on both sides of the argument that had relevance to what you and I are arguing about and I already put up a counter argument as you can read once again below.   That is if you read your article in the first place, because if you did you should have recognized the quotes were from that article that you now should be able to more easily pick out I suppose.

Like I said ron game over but thanks for playing!
.


but but but ron I read the links and it does nore to shoot you in the foot than anything else like most of your posts.

I will even be kind and give you a point you can obfuscate and have some fun with.


Colour, location and amount of smoke can provide valuable clues to the fire’s size, intensity and fuel.

Hitler would love these new buildings eh?  LOL
Hydrogen cyanide is formed when plastic products, such as the PVC pipe used in residential construction, burn.

A fire involving petroleum products will produce large quantities of black, rolling smoke that rises in a vertical column.

Virtually all solid materials will emit a white smoke when first heated.

There you go^^^^^^^^^^^^^ make this your central focus and claim it takes fire an hour to heat a material hot enough to burn.....  When I seen that I knew precisely what you had in mind with that link!  BWAHAHA

This white smoke is actually moisture.

Yes until it gets up to temp with takes ahem, "seconds"  not many minutes as in an hour like the wtc burned with the smoke coming from the same place the whole time.


As the material dries out and breaks down, the colour of the smoke will change. Natural materials will change to tan or brown while plastics and painted surfaces will turn to grey. Grey is a result of moisture and hydrocarbons (black) mixing. All materials will eventually off gas a black smoke; flame contact will cause materials to give off black smoke right away. 


but then I digress.  You know this all started when I posted the difference between a jet plowing into the ground and an alleged jet plowing into a building.

you know the real plane crash was dense black smoke and the fake one was gray.

So back to the begining here is the color of the alleged plane that supposedly went into the north tower


[image]local://upfiles/59055/3960B770424A47BB9E31B0C318F950B9.jpg[/image]




evilgagger -> RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE (2/26/2010 1:37:12 PM)

The way I look at at it is as follows: the reason this subject keep pooping up is because there are lots of unanswered questions, lots of details that don't make any sense. Is it a cover up for something bigger? If all the questiond have been answered, this subject will go away. Like the Kennedy assasination, the subject still pops up.




Real0ne -> RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE (2/26/2010 1:42:18 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: evilgagger

The way I look at at it is as follows: the reason this subject keep pooping up is because there are lots of unanswered questions, lots of details that don't make any sense. Is it a cover up for something bigger? If all the questiond have been answered, this subject will go away. Like the Kennedy assasination, the subject still pops up.


throughout history there is a long list of tyranny but certain people rather than taking care of business and getting down to the bottom of things would rather live in denial and or sweep it all uinder the table and pretend it never happened and then turn right around and whine how poorly the government is managing THEM!
bwwwhahahaa




Page: <<   < prev  6 7 [8] 9 10   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.0625