quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

why the fuck would anyone spray the ceilings


16 buildings 1500 pounds to shoot em and you seen the video how many fucking times and you still spout the same shit?

There comes a time when willful dumb ass needs to be called what it is.

Because MrMister had a link to architects against 9/11. If you had bothered to even read it, you would see that spraying the ceilings is the suggestion put forward, by a site which YOU have used before to back your claim. So here we have YOU admitting one of your sources is making a ridiculous claim.

What was that about "Willful dumbass"

lots of people I would take that at face value coming from you bullshit unless you put up the quote.  just more of your conflated obtuse obfuscation.

quote or shove it.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

why the fuck would anyone spray the ceilings


16 buildings 1500 pounds to shoot em and you seen the video how many fucking times and you still spout the same shit?

There comes a time when willful dumb ass needs to be called what it is.

Because MrMister had a link to architects against 9/11. If you had bothered to even read it, you would see that spraying the ceilings is the suggestion put forward, by a site which YOU have used before to back your claim. So here we have YOU admitting one of your sources is making a ridiculous claim.

What was that about "Willful dumbass"

lots of people I would take that at face value coming from you bullshit unless you put up the quote.  just more of your conflated obtuse obfuscation.

quote or shove it.

Its  a source you have used. If you want to find the quote do what I did and read MrMisters links.

While I am at it, you never did say if you have any experience of working in demolition or construction, was the question too simple for you ?

quote:

I dont feed title trolls LOL

quote:

ORIGINAL: zephyroftheNorth

quote:

I dont feed title trolls LOL

So, that's a no?

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

quote:

I looked in my copy of the constitution and nowhere did what you claim should be to manage guns.

http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=3098129

If you weren't so busy with insults and smileys, you could read threads for context. But even in that post, you're inventing instead of reading.

Horseshit, replacing analysing with inventing wont buy you a free lunch.

The claim was that we don't restrict free speech, so why should we restrict guns? The reality, which I posted, is that we do indeed restrict free speech.

Which is a viloation of the constitution and you not only apologize for it but extend it to condoning the same violation to guns.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

quote:

States or municipalities shouldn't be restricting rights.
Restricting First Amendment rights or Freedom of the Press wouldn't be tolerated for one minute! I don't understand why people have tolerated this nonsense for so long.

The difference is that firearms are potentially a threat to other citizens.

When free speech or freedom of the press poses a threat to other citizens, it is also restricted.

No reason firearms should be exempt from this reasonable approach.

In that thread, from there, you went off on your pet law rant instead of sticking to the topic.

well somone has to keep you on the ground.

If you want to claim that we DON'T restrict free speech---libel, national security, for example--have at it. But we do.

again your failure to understand law.  There is a difference between restricting my right of free speech and trespassing on another rights in whhich libel would be the case.  Put it in code however is a violation of the constitution.  sorry thats the bottom line like it or not.

Oh, and

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

When you have to invent my views in order to "refute" them, it doesn't say much for you.

*insert mocking smiley*

Now, if you want to claim we shouldn't limit free speech either, enjoy.

But you don't seem able to argue points and positions--everything is personal attacks to you.

quote:

ORIGINAL: zephyroftheNorth

quote:

I dont feed title trolls LOL

So, that's a no?

quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

RO-  picture that I am a big bank.

I require 7 day notice to let you have your money.

how does that sound?

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

quote:

ORIGINAL: zephyroftheNorth

quote:

I dont feed title trolls LOL

So, that's a no?

Did you expect anything other than him dodging the questions  Zeph ? [;)]

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

RO-  picture that I am a big bank.

I require 7 day notice to let you have your money.

how does that sound?

they have to put in a money to the federal reserve for it LOL

thought ya'd catch me eh?  LOL

quote:

thats a none of your fucking business. He is witch hunting for titles so he can gauge his opinion based on the tittle not the information therein. I do not feed title trolls get it? Either he and you have the smarts to figger out what information is valid and what is not without a title of you are all dumbfucks. Just trying to advance you to my stage of the game since I dont need titles to gauge the validity of information.

quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

RO-  picture that I am a big bank.

I require 7 day notice to let you have your money.

how does that sound?

they have to put in a money to the federal reserve for it LOL

thought ya'd catch me eh?  LOL

What if I told you most of the large banks have this 7 day wait effective 4-1-10 and this applies to EVERY state?

...and that it is specifically written into their TOS fine print.

quote:

ORIGINAL: zephyroftheNorth

quote:

thats a none of your fucking business. He is witch hunting for titles so he can gauge his opinion based on the tittle not the information therein. I do not feed title trolls get it? Either he and you have the smarts to figger out what information is valid and what is not without a title of you are all dumbfucks. Just trying to advance you to my stage of the game since I dont need titles to gauge the validity of information.

Hmmm sounding just a tad defensive there, RO. I'm still guessing the answer is no, though [;)]

quote:

ORIGINAL: zephyroftheNorth

quote:

thats a none of your fucking business. He is witch hunting for titles so he can gauge his opinion based on the tittle not the information therein. I do not feed title trolls get it? Either he and you have the smarts to figger out what information is valid and what is not without a title of you are all dumbfucks. Just trying to advance you to my stage of the game since I dont need titles to gauge the validity of information.

Hmmm sounding just a tad defensive there, RO. I'm still guessing the answer is no, though [;)]

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: zephyroftheNorth

quote:

thats a none of your fucking business. He is witch hunting for titles so he can gauge his opinion based on the tittle not the information therein. I do not feed title trolls get it? Either he and you have the smarts to figger out what information is valid and what is not without a title of you are all dumbfucks. Just trying to advance you to my stage of the game since I dont need titles to gauge the validity of information.

Hmmm sounding just a tad defensive there, RO. I'm still guessing the answer is no, though [;)]

nah just my policy.  I know how desperately these people need ammo to create new positions LOL

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

RO-  picture that I am a big bank.

I require 7 day notice to let you have your money.

how does that sound?

they have to put in a money to the federal reserve for it LOL

thought ya'd catch me eh?  LOL

What if I told you most of the large banks have this 7 day wait effective 4-1-10 and this applies to EVERY state?

...and that it is specifically written into their TOS fine print.

yeh ask them why man, they have to order it the federal reserve.  It has been that way on large sums for some time now. 

All they do is keep a ledger.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53
my opinion is, as I have repeatedly stated, based upon working in construction.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53
I didnt ask you for any title, just if you had worked in demolition and or construction.

quote:

ORIGINAL: zephyroftheNorth

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: zephyroftheNorth

quote:

thats a none of your fucking business. He is witch hunting for titles so he can gauge his opinion based on the tittle not the information therein. I do not feed title trolls get it? Either he and you have the smarts to figger out what information is valid and what is not without a title of you are all dumbfucks. Just trying to advance you to my stage of the game since I dont need titles to gauge the validity of information.

Hmmm sounding just a tad defensive there, RO. I'm still guessing the answer is no, though [;)]

nah just my policy.  I know how desperately these people need ammo to create new positions LOL

I see.  So it's your position to not make your arguement stronger by not stating any qualifications you might have. Interesting strategy.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Rule

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53
my opinion is, as I have repeatedly stated, based upon working in construction.

I respect that - as well as the nature of your mind. However, having worked in construction clearly is not sufficient for you to solve the various aspects of the demolition of the WTC1,2 & 7 buildings.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53
I didnt ask you for any title, just if you had worked in demolition and or construction.

I do not know what RealOne's background is, but I suspect that he does know quite a bit about such things.

I do not. I just apply general universal principles to problems. To me it is obvious that those three buildings were demolished - and for 98 % thanks to the NIST report and 2 % of my own supergenius I know how.