RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE

RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

Real0ne -> RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE (3/8/2010 8:01:09 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: pahunkboy I am too heavy in silver. 88% - 12% gold. Where as it likely is better to go 88% gold and 12% silver. Hopefully I can get that taken care of before the deflationary depression. well what these guys do not understand is that they can completely blast the monetary system and you still hard specie that can be traded any where in the world. Meanwhile their IOU's arent worth a continental-----pun intended

Real0ne -> RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE (3/8/2010 8:04:23 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: pahunkboy RO, money just is not important to anyone here. It is too abstract. Because we have to have experts and annalists, pundits and advisers. The folks here have no interest in that. They are more concerned about their ego. no amount of proof can persuade someone who had shitty sources and their mind is made up. go to an economist to find out about money when the federal reserve says it quite well in a relatively short read no less. and the funniest fucking part of it all is when they continually inflate the fuck out of the money like they do, that 500 grand they got in their 401k can only buy 1/2 as much as when they earned it. About 50% since 2001. Great way to rip a public off! So while you buy gold and retain your value they lose theirs with inflation. Meaning you can buy what you earned, they can only buy 1/2. Thats a real concept.

Musicmystery -> RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE (3/8/2010 8:07:29 PM)
quote: no amount of proof can persuade someone who had shitty sources and their mind is made up. Ain't that the truth.

pahunkboy -> RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE (3/8/2010 8:08:30 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Real0ne quote: ORIGINAL: pahunkboy RO, money just is not important to anyone here. It is too abstract. Because we have to have experts and annalists, pundits and advisers. The folks here have no interest in that. They are more concerned about their ego. no amount of proof can persuade someone who had shitty sources and their mind is made up. go to an economist to find out about money when the federal reserve says it quite well in a relatively short read no less. ...that the collapse and the wipe out of the peoples wealth is something the elite have done for centuries. SOP. It is all connected. Yet- the masses fall for the same tricks every few generations. Razzle dazzle- smoke and mirrors. ...the notion that what we see today- is the final outcome. We might have months or a few years- but the grid is coming down. ALL fiat does. I just wish I could get my brother on board.

Real0ne -> RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE (3/8/2010 8:08:40 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Musicmystery quote: no amount of proof can persuade someone who had shitty sources and their mind is made up. Ain't that the truth. bye! dreamer

pahunkboy -> RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE (3/8/2010 8:09:48 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Real0ne quote: ORIGINAL: pahunkboy RO, money just is not important to anyone here. It is too abstract. Because we have to have experts and annalists, pundits and advisers. The folks here have no interest in that. They are more concerned about their ego. no amount of proof can persuade someone who had shitty sources and their mind is made up. go to an economist to find out about money when the federal reserve says it quite well in a relatively short read no less. and the funniest fucking part of it all is when they continually inflate the fuck out of the money like they do, that 500 grand they got in their 401k can only buy 1/2 as much as when they earned it. About 50% since 2001. Great way to rip a public off! So while you buy gold and retain your value they lose theirs with inflation. Meaning you can buy what you earned, they can only buy 1/2. Thats a real concept. Then it is settled. We will broadcast it live on webcam. The day- you and I jump out the window.

pahunkboy -> RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE (3/8/2010 8:11:36 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Real0ne quote: ORIGINAL: Musicmystery quote: no amount of proof can persuade someone who had shitty sources and their mind is made up. Ain't that the truth. bye! dreamer RO, MM believes that the NWO includes him. That he has a place at the table. So that is why he is set in his views on defending the house of cards.

Musicmystery -> RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE (3/8/2010 8:12:05 PM)
quote: So while you buy gold and retain your value While you're in that econ text, read the chapters on supply and demand.

Real0ne -> RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE (3/8/2010 8:12:29 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: pahunkboy ...that the collapse and the wipe out of the peoples wealth is something the elite have done for centuries. SOP. It is all connected. Yet- the masses fall for the same tricks every few generations. Razzle dazzle- smoke and mirrors. ...the notion that what we see today- is the final outcome. We might have months or a few years- but the grid is coming down. ALL fiat does. I just wish I could get my brother on board. yup and history is doomed to repeat itself. the maxim is quid pro quo and that is what his concept violates.

Real0ne -> RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE (3/8/2010 8:14:00 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Musicmystery quote: So while you buy gold and retain your value While you're in that econ text, read the chapters on supply and demand. dont worry there IS enough "specie" to go around. well? Are you unhappy that I stomped your gold argument before you had a chance to make it? hmm.... I guess he is mad at me now.

thornhappy -> RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE (3/8/2010 8:41:30 PM)
Be so kind as to not tell us what we are interested in. In the case of discussion boards, silence does not mean assent to your, or anyone else's point of view quote: ORIGINAL: pahunkboy RO, money just is not important to anyone here. It is too abstract. Because we have to have experts and annalists, pundits and advisers. The folks here have no interest in that. They are more concerned about their ego.

pahunkboy -> RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE (3/8/2010 8:49:13 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: thornhappy Be so kind as to not tell us what we are interested in. In the case of discussion boards, silence does not mean assent to your, or anyone else's point of view quote: ORIGINAL: pahunkboy RO, money just is not important to anyone here. It is too abstract. Because we have to have experts and annalists, pundits and advisers. The folks here have no interest in that. They are more concerned about their ego. I have no idea what you just said.

pahunkboy -> RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE (3/8/2010 8:51:53 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Real0ne quote: ORIGINAL: pahunkboy RO, money just is not important to anyone here. It is too abstract. Because we have to have experts and annalists, pundits and advisers. The folks here have no interest in that. They are more concerned about their ego. no amount of proof can persuade someone who had shitty sources and their mind is made up. go to an economist to find out about money when the federal reserve says it quite well in a relatively short read no less. and the funniest fucking part of it all is when they continually inflate the fuck out of the money like they do, that 500 grand they got in their 401k can only buy 1/2 as much as when they earned it. About 50% since 2001. Great way to rip a public off! So while you buy gold and retain your value they lose theirs with inflation. Meaning you can buy what you earned, they can only buy 1/2. Thats a real concept. So then- that would imply that gold has increased in price since 9-11. Guess what? You would be correct. Hope you are getting your salt out. We got some traders here that want to unload some gold to us!

Real0ne -> RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE (3/8/2010 8:51:57 PM)
The common law doctrine of estoppel by acquiescence is applied when one party gives legal notice to a second party of a fact or claim, and the second party fails to challenge or refute that claim within a reasonable time. The second party is said to have acquiesced to the claim, and is estopped from later challenging it, or making a counterclaim. The doctrine is similar to, and often applied with, estoppel by laches. quote: ORIGINAL: thornhappy Be so kind as to not tell us what we are interested in. In the case of discussion boards, silence does not mean assent to your, or anyone else's point of view quote: ORIGINAL: pahunkboy RO, money just is not important to anyone here. It is too abstract. Because we have to have experts and annalists, pundits and advisers. The folks here have no interest in that. They are more concerned about their ego.

calamitysandra -> RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE (3/9/2010 3:47:06 AM)
Pahunk, I have asked you before and gotten no answer, but I will try again. Why in the world should anybody want your gold and silver if the scenario you paint will come to pass? Neither of those metals has much intricate value, they are not good for much, and nothing of what they are good at is in any way pertinent for the survival, or basic comforts of the human race. They only have worth because we decide they have worth, in a changed world like the one you are predicting, their worth will be lost. Why should anybody be willing to give up food, or shelter, clothing, or any other basic necessities in return for a largely useless clump of metal?

MrRodgers -> RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE (3/9/2010 6:14:10 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: calamitysandra Pahunk, I have asked you before and gotten no answer, but I will try again. Why in the world should anybody want your gold and silver if the scenario you paint will come to pass? Neither of those metals has much intricate value, they are not good for much, and nothing of what they are good at is in any way pertinent for the survival, or basic comforts of the human race. They only have worth because we decide they have worth, in a changed world like the one you are predicting, their worth will be lost. Why should anybody be willing to give up food, or shelter, clothing, or any other basic necessities in return for a largely useless clump of metal? This is what I've been saying for years and years. I'll take that mattress full of cash anytime, over that drawer full of gold. As I've written, gold is called a 'precious' metal. I say what's so precious about it ? Speculating in gold is no different han speculating in sugar...it's called capitalism and one had better not be...the last buyer.

mnottertail -> RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE (3/9/2010 6:44:52 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Real0ne The common law doctrine of estoppel by acquiescence is applied when one party gives legal notice to a second party of a fact or claim, and the second party fails to challenge or refute that claim within a reasonable time. The second party is said to have acquiesced to the claim, and is estopped from later challenging it, or making a counterclaim. The doctrine is similar to, and often applied with, estoppel by laches. At least two things that fuck you on this one, shithouse. legal notice, which you haven't given, and that is a matter of procedural law, not of argumentation, and there are no statute of limitations set on answering your every bit of bullshit. But you keep on reading, I judge you at about a 6th month olds level of comprehension in legal matters, so youre improving ever so slightly.

thornhappy -> RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE (3/9/2010 6:46:47 AM)
In other words, don't tell us that we don't have an interest in something, just because we no longer respond to your posts. quote: ORIGINAL: pahunkboy The folks here have no interest in that. They are more concerned about their ego.

thornhappy -> RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE (3/9/2010 6:49:24 AM)
Ummm, since when does the common law apply to a fricken discussion board? If you walked up to someone on the street and started spouting some of your more wild-eyed theories and they ignored you, that would somehow be a matter of the common law? Jesus. quote: ORIGINAL: Real0ne The common law doctrine of estoppel by acquiescence is applied when one party gives legal notice to a second party of a fact or claim, and the second party fails to challenge or refute that claim within a reasonable time. The second party is said to have acquiesced to the claim, and is estopped from later challenging it, or making a counterclaim. The doctrine is similar to, and often applied with, estoppel by laches. quote: ORIGINAL: thornhappy Be so kind as to not tell us what we are interested in. In the case of discussion boards, silence does not mean assent to your, or anyone else's point of view quote: ORIGINAL: pahunkboy RO, money just is not important to anyone here. It is too abstract. Because we have to have experts and annalists, pundits and advisers. The folks here have no interest in that. They are more concerned about their ego.

pahunkboy -> RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE (3/9/2010 7:22:16 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: calamitysandra Pahunk, I have asked you before and gotten no answer, but I will try again. Why in the world should anybody want your gold and silver if the scenario you paint will come to pass? Neither of those metals has much intricate value, they are not good for much, and nothing of what they are good at is in any way pertinent for the survival, or basic comforts of the human race. They only have worth because we decide they have worth, in a changed world like the one you are predicting, their worth will be lost. Why should anybody be willing to give up food, or shelter, clothing, or any other basic necessities in return for a largely useless clump of metal? Current money is fiat. People like money. So who wants paper roses when real ones are much nicer.

Page: << < prev 29 30 [31] 32 33 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.03125