Termyn8or
Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005 Status: offline
|
Intelligence testing has indeed become a complex subject. And what constitutes true intelligence anyway ? For example I can tell you how to make a neutron bomb, turn a microwave into a lethal weapon, how to do many things. I can and have designed and built electronic equipment, and I mean with nothing but a six dollar calculator. However I have no idea how to filet a fish, to gut a deer, any of that survival stuff, except to shoot. These are basic survival skills that I lack. So really am I that smart ? For example you could be a top engineer at NASA and be most of the brains that put a Man on the moon, but be unable to fry up a burger, or maybe even to effectively and safely boil a pot of water. You may have designed the camshaft, roller lifters and entire intake system for the 3800 Grand National engine (I'had a few, I LIKE them) and yet be unable to change a flat tire. The word is savant, but it's meaning is too severe in degree to use in most situations. And additionally, if you want to give any kind of IQ test and have quantifiable results, the questions must be the same for all. This can prove difficult to manage. Perhaps there is no real test of intelligence. Or maybe it is life. I know an HVAC engineer who can't balance a checkbook. My boss is not stupid by any stretch of the imagination, but he has an ignorant streak about a mile wide. Well the guy is in his sixties. Even if he was as ignorant as a bowling ball an intelligence test would not find him to be stupid. These things bring a whole new dimension into the mix. And, just to get one in edgewise - Hitler was a non smoker :-) Is intelligence truly quantifiable ? Right now the indications are running towards the negative. And if you really want to go somewhere with this, of all the people I know, the most intelligent among them smoke pot. Throw that in your pipe and light it up. Ironic yes, but you already know that irony and I are very close. Known associates in fact. T
|