RE: Nearly all US Presidents are descendant of British & French Royal Families (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Real0ne -> RE: Nearly all US Presidents are descendant of British & French Royal Families (3/1/2010 9:13:10 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

well you all need to go to the library and get the aforementioned book and look yourself up.  If you are not in there since the purpose of the book was to trace the baronege then you cannot make claim to the throne ot any derivative thereof.

It would be interesting to see if anyone was in there but I am betting that since there is only 120,000 names in there that no one here is in the book.

toodles


Burke's Peerage has funny rules about that stuff. My direct male ancestor was transported after Culloden in 1746 and was the eldest son of a Scottish clan chief. So the chiefdom and the associated fuedal title (baron in this case) went to the second son and descends through his line. But my distant cousin is certainly listed in Burkes (under the clan chief's and the fuedal title as well).


well and the presidents we are talking about "all" have peerage listed in the book. 




DomKen -> RE: Nearly all US Presidents are descendant of British & French Royal Families (3/1/2010 9:17:32 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

well you all need to go to the library and get the aforementioned book and look yourself up.  If you are not in there since the purpose of the book was to trace the baronege then you cannot make claim to the throne ot any derivative thereof.

It would be interesting to see if anyone was in there but I am betting that since there is only 120,000 names in there that no one here is in the book.

toodles


Burke's Peerage has funny rules about that stuff. My direct male ancestor was transported after Culloden in 1746 and was the eldest son of a Scottish clan chief. So the chiefdom and the associated fuedal title (baron in this case) went to the second son and descends through his line. But my distant cousin is certainly listed in Burkes (under the clan chief's and the fuedal title as well).


well and the presidents we are talking about "all" have peerage listed in the book. 


The Presidents are in Burke's because they are Presidents not because they are british title holders.
http://www.burkespeerage.com/welcome.aspx
quote:

There are over 1 million names in our more than 15,000 records of the peerage and gentry of the United Kingdom, historical families of Ireland, distinguished and presidential families of the United States, and the royal families of Europe, as well as many other prominent individuals.




LadyEllen -> RE: Nearly all US Presidents are descendant of British & French Royal Families (3/1/2010 9:22:00 AM)

Pretty sure its Burke's that also lists extinct noble titles - "Earl Of Somewhereorother" for instance. You could have yourself a great time with the right planning, by taking up one of these titles over in the US and putting yourself about a bit. Important to get the upper class British accent right though - put a plum in your mouth and repeat "how now, brown cow" until you enunciate like the queen.

E




juliaoceania -> RE: Nearly all US Presidents are descendant of British & French Royal Families (3/1/2010 9:26:00 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyEllen

Shouldnt let it bother you Julia - its 4/1 on that youre descended from the Godwinson clan too. Which would make us related. The only remaining questions then being, which of us is secretly pulling the strings in the NWO and do you want to come for the traditional family Christmas dinner this year?

E


That would be you, since you live closer to the Rothschilds  and The Square Mile than I do[;)]

I will throw Christmas next year though




juliaoceania -> RE: Nearly all US Presidents are descendant of British & French Royal Families (3/1/2010 9:27:11 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne



so you are both in the book?



Probably




LadyEllen -> RE: Nearly all US Presidents are descendant of British & French Royal Families (3/1/2010 9:30:09 AM)

Sorry Julia, that would be far too obvious dont you think? Better to have the agents of evil located far from the nexus where suspicion should fall more lightly upon them, and connection be harder to prove.

Mind you, the way some people think, the entire British population rules the world; those squalid high rise housing blocks where poverty and drug use are rampant do provide the ideal cover for world domination mind.

E




mnottertail -> RE: Nearly all US Presidents are descendant of British & French Royal Families (3/1/2010 9:31:13 AM)

So, eres da fing, guv....if we aww is Royawty, whos den lef to lick our arses?

Ali G




Termyn8or -> RE: Nearly all US Presidents are descendant of British & French Royal Families (3/1/2010 10:01:20 AM)

"What the fuck does blue blood mean, currently"

Hard to say. My analysis indicates that it came from a myth that human blood is blue until it is exposed to oxygen, like in the air when you bleed. Further this tour of thought would indicate that their blood is not spilled in the wars they start, which can be a hot spark in a roomful of propane sometimes. It may also mean that they value their bloodline that much.

Well, I am decendent from the Urbans of Poland. I'm told that our clan was doing well in the old country, and came here for greater opportunity, and maybe saw WW2 coming. But my ancestors cavorting with royalty means nothing now. I have left alot of totally red blood on these streets in my time. Remember can't let air hit it. Or was it light ? Whatever.

This whole thing brings up other issues which, I am sure, you will appreciate me not delving into at this time. Don't embarrass the family ? You ain't seen nuthin. This old time bloodline thing is quite thick. I mean if I had a Wife who worked and made more money than me, they would never speak to me. Not that they do that much anymore, but at least they don't hate me at the moment, except for the fact that I have no kids. They are not very happy with that fact.

Fukum, I build my own life. I don't care if I am Jesus Chris's brother and the son of Stalin. It is what I do that counts now. And this family would rather see me be a suicide bomber than to marry a Ukrainian. No shit !

But this is MY life. Unlike royalty though, this family will only offer limited support and help. We are expected to succeed, and we have largely. None of us have ever been a check person, that is on welfare or even disability. When I become disabled I am expected to die well.

Maybe it's the same thing in a differnt form, but I don't get an allowance, and some mebers of the family are quite well off, spending $25,000 to save their dog and shit like that. You have to understand the mentality, which took me a lifetime to visualize. I could go ask them for a half million to start a business or something, but if I asked for a couple of grand to make ends meet they would spit on me. Not literally, but you know what I mean.

Royalty's family name may be "We got it" but my family's name is "We get it". Got it ? Just to understand these peole's view on life is a challenge. I had some Uncles or something in the Prussian army. Get thewm in the house, pour some beer in them and they still sit in a cushy sofa as if they were at attention. I suspect they slept at attention as well. Actrually I am not so well regarded because I have not done military service.

But then that doesn't change the fact thaty I would like to see the inbred aristocracy of this planet all catch a very nasty, incurable disease. You cry and dote over Princess Diana, I say fuck her, some Arab did !. She is dead so what. People cried when Kennedy died, if I was old enough to give a shit, I still wouldn't. Stupid fuck, if you don't know better than to write stupid letters like that to BenGurion, maybe the vice President would be better in the big chair. Dumkopf. But then the Kennedys were somewhat neuvoriche, as they made alot of their initial stake by moonshining. I'm not sure that Nixon belongs in this, but his initial stake came from the winnings in a high stakes poker game. I doubt his blood had much to do with that.

To finalize, I think we need some new blood, of whatever color.

T




Real0ne -> RE: Nearly all US Presidents are descendant of British & French Royal Families (3/1/2010 10:39:36 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

well you all need to go to the library and get the aforementioned book and look yourself up.  If you are not in there since the purpose of the book was to trace the baronege then you cannot make claim to the throne ot any derivative thereof.

It would be interesting to see if anyone was in there but I am betting that since there is only 120,000 names in there that no one here is in the book.

toodles


Burke's Peerage has funny rules about that stuff. My direct male ancestor was transported after Culloden in 1746 and was the eldest son of a Scottish clan chief. So the chiefdom and the associated fuedal title (baron in this case) went to the second son and descends through his line. But my distant cousin is certainly listed in Burkes (under the clan chief's and the fuedal title as well).


well and the presidents we are talking about "all" have peerage listed in the book. 


The Presidents are in Burke's because they are Presidents not because they are british title holders.
http://www.burkespeerage.com/welcome.aspx
quote:

There are over 1 million names in our more than 15,000 records of the peerage and gentry of the United Kingdom, historical families of Ireland, distinguished and presidential families of the United States, and the royal families of Europe, as well as many other prominent individuals.




yes and when you look up their lineage they are part of the peerage

that means that they list the presidents and they list the peerage and you have to turn the pages and compare the  presidents name to the peerage and see if there is a nexus and if there is a nexus then that means they are part of the peerage.

simple really




pahunkboy -> RE: Nearly all US Presidents are descendant of British & French Royal Families (3/1/2010 11:03:56 AM)

this fits in with the eugenics that they push!


great find real one!




Musicmystery -> RE: Nearly all US Presidents are descendant of British & French Royal Families (3/1/2010 11:24:38 AM)

quote:

Nearly all US Presidents are descendant from the British and French Royal Families


Who cares?




slvemike4u -> RE: Nearly all US Presidents are descendant of British & French Royal Families (3/1/2010 11:27:22 AM)

Well the Slovakians do MM,they feel they are under represented and are demanding their shot at the office.




Musicmystery -> RE: Nearly all US Presidents are descendant of British & French Royal Families (3/1/2010 11:32:44 AM)

Tell them to make sure they come from a swing state.




Real0ne -> RE: Nearly all US Presidents are descendant of British & French Royal Families (3/1/2010 11:36:56 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

this fits in with the eugenics that they push!


great find real one!



Thanks...

It helps put things into perspective for those with vision who have not been blinded by error.

as usual they fell on their asses trying to come up with anything what so ever other than their wild imaginations that would indicate we won the revolutionary war LOL

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

Here we are on an adult web site arguing with a moron whether  or not we a)won the Revolutionary War..and are indeed a sovereign nation...and b) whether or not as a result of not winning that war,but rather just negotiating a cease fire ,are stil a collection of British colonies....albeit secret colonies.....does that seem strange to anyone else?




like I said:

1) we paid the kings war debts

2) NOWHERE is there any verbiage to winning a war

and no one has been able to show that we did win that war or even make a point to that effect as I said.

All you can show is a treat was made to end hostilities like any 2 countries and or people make with each other where no war is required to prompt it.

3) it has NOTHING to do with secrets, only someone who completely fails to understand the meaning of a contract laid out for all to see.

and in as much as sovereignty goes, sovereignty was lost compltely when the UNITED STATES went insolvent as denoted by 3 executive orders by FDR in 1933.

Its contract no voodoo, no mystery, no amount of stupid slurrs will change that it is CONTRACT.

I rest my case.





so after they go down in flames out come the peanut gallery name calling brigades! 

BBWWHAHAHAHA




mnottertail -> RE: Nearly all US Presidents are descendant of British & French Royal Families (3/1/2010 11:40:32 AM)

No, there just is no significance to this whatsoever. That's all, so we are fuckin' with you, wanna see you go off.





pahunkboy -> RE: Nearly all US Presidents are descendant of British & French Royal Families (3/1/2010 11:46:37 AM)

well-the US would be- -- ?doomed is an Arab- or Chinese- or Pakistani= or any number of such- become the leader of the free world.




mnottertail -> RE: Nearly all US Presidents are descendant of British & French Royal Families (3/1/2010 11:47:16 AM)

and why is that?




slvemike4u -> RE: Nearly all US Presidents are descendant of British & French Royal Families (3/1/2010 11:50:49 AM)

Wait a minute....I've "gone down in flames"?....bullshit,I have gone down in elevators,parks,offices and abandoned buildings....but never,I repeat never have I gone down in flames.....shit I burn just like the next guy...and I have a full head of hair to boot,that shit smells when it burns!




susie -> RE: Nearly all US Presidents are descendant of British & French Royal Families (3/1/2010 1:02:26 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

well you all need to go to the library and get the aforementioned book and look yourself up.  If you are not in there since the purpose of the book was to trace the baronege then you cannot make claim to the throne ot any derivative thereof.

It would be interesting to see if anyone was in there but I am betting that since there is only 120,000 names in there that no one here is in the book.

toodles


Burke's Peerage has funny rules about that stuff. My direct male ancestor was transported after Culloden in 1746 and was the eldest son of a Scottish clan chief. So the chiefdom and the associated fuedal title (baron in this case) went to the second son and descends through his line. But my distant cousin is certainly listed in Burkes (under the clan chief's and the fuedal title as well).


well and the presidents we are talking about "all" have peerage listed in the book. 


The Presidents are in Burke's because they are Presidents not because they are british title holders.
http://www.burkespeerage.com/welcome.aspx
quote:

There are over 1 million names in our more than 15,000 records of the peerage and gentry of the United Kingdom, historical families of Ireland, distinguished and presidential families of the United States, and the royal families of Europe, as well as many other prominent individuals.




yes and when you look up their lineage they are part of the peerage

that means that they list the presidents and they list the peerage and you have to turn the pages and compare the  presidents name to the peerage and see if there is a nexus and if there is a nexus then that means they are part of the peerage.

simple really



The US presidents are listed in Burke's because of their position. They do NOT have peerages of any sort. Burke's has now taken to list a variety of people in public life including Sir Michael Caine and Sir Cliff Richard. Neither of them have peerages either.

I think you need to go back and understand what the listings mean before you spout more rubbish.




Real0ne -> RE: Nearly all US Presidents are descendant of British & French Royal Families (3/1/2010 1:44:19 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: susie

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

well you all need to go to the library and get the aforementioned book and look yourself up.  If you are not in there since the purpose of the book was to trace the baronege then you cannot make claim to the throne ot any derivative thereof.

It would be interesting to see if anyone was in there but I am betting that since there is only 120,000 names in there that no one here is in the book.

toodles


Burke's Peerage has funny rules about that stuff. My direct male ancestor was transported after Culloden in 1746 and was the eldest son of a Scottish clan chief. So the chiefdom and the associated fuedal title (baron in this case) went to the second son and descends through his line. But my distant cousin is certainly listed in Burkes (under the clan chief's and the fuedal title as well).


well and the presidents we are talking about "all" have peerage listed in the book. 


The Presidents are in Burke's because they are Presidents not because they are british title holders.
http://www.burkespeerage.com/welcome.aspx
quote:

There are over 1 million names in our more than 15,000 records of the peerage and gentry of the United Kingdom, historical families of Ireland, distinguished and presidential families of the United States, and the royal families of Europe, as well as many other prominent individuals.




yes and when you look up their lineage they are part of the peerage

that means that they list the presidents and they list the peerage and you have to turn the pages and compare the  presidents name to the peerage and see if there is a nexus and if there is a nexus then that means they are part of the peerage.

simple really



The US presidents are listed in Burke's because of their position. They do NOT have peerages of any sort. Burke's has now taken to list a variety of people in public life including Sir Michael Caine and Sir Cliff Richard. Neither of them have peerages either.

I think you need to go back and understand what the listings mean before you spout more rubbish.



well you see just because there is an exception it does not abrogate the rule.  go play with dom ken or something  ;)




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875