truckinslave
Posts: 3897
Joined: 6/16/2004 Status: offline
|
Just skimming part of the CBO study: "Many of the studies conclude that tort reform can affect outcomes most closely related to the tort system in much the same way that advocates of changing the tort system would claim. Those studies find that reforms in general have decreased the number of lawsuits, reduced awards," and "States that enacted tort reforms had lower Medicare spending for hospitalization of elderly patients with heart disease and heart attacks, with no significant increase in adverse health outcomes." It's nonsensical to argue that high punitive damage awards, and/or unlimited pain and suffering awards, do not result in more extensive testing. We really do need some commonsense thinking and action, not more "black is white" argument. If you think that suing doctors into oblivion reduces cost, go try to convince someone else (you can argue increased quality, sensibly, but not decreased cost). Tort reform, pooling, and buying across state lines are all ideas whose time has come. Obamacare? Maybe not.
|