Arpig
Posts: 9930
Joined: 1/3/2006 From: Increasingly further from reality Status: offline
|
Thanks for answering my question re the topic Elisabella. You make a valid point about it being medically unnecesary in most cases. It isn't really on the same level as a boob job, but still optional. However an equally good arguement can be made vis-a-vis the social costs of unwanted children...a conundrum indeed. I would still come down in favour of it being covered by whatever insurance system is in place, but that is because I do not view it as a moral issue (in fact I believe it is an issue for women alone, none of any man's business) so it is just a question of whether having a unwanted child is the same as having small boobs or an overly large nose. Its my opinion (based on my experience as a parent of 3 wanted children) that child rearing is by far and away a much bigger comitment than wearing glasses or a b-cup, in fact its such an enormous commitment and so very important a job that I feel the issue is a unique one. Given the enormity of the results of not having an abortion, and the really dismal performance of the "adoption" option, I think that abortion should be an available option for all women, not just rich women. Well I am somewhat rambling here, so I will end this post by asking Willbuer (if he is still reading this thread) to send me his sauce recipe as well....mine is somewhat lacking in umph.
_____________________________
Big man! Pig Man! Ha Ha...Charade you are! Why do they leave out the letter b on "Garage Sale" signs? CM's #1 All-Time Also-Ran
|