RE: Democrats express safety concerns after protests (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


popeye1250 -> RE: Democrats express safety concerns after protests (3/24/2010 5:53:57 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Muirren

Remember a certain war that happened back in the 1700's? My ancestors fought against a tyrannical leader, won, and that is one of the reasons you have the freedom (being chipped away as I type) that you now enjoy. I guess you don't consider that violence? It's time to pick up our weapons, get behind the wall, and take our country  back!


Murren, it certainly isn't good when we have congressmen from Michigan talking about "controlling the people!"




Elisabella -> RE: Democrats express safety concerns after protests (3/24/2010 5:56:17 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Thadius
LOL I was thinking it sounded like the late '60s, but yeah. [;)] Oh wait those were other types of parties, but the point still stands.[8D]


Hehehe yeah but that was a revolution in mind and spirit, not a coup d'etat.

You know I was thinking...on most of these issues the Republicans are 'correct' - Obama is socialist. Not "a socialist" as in a member of the political party, but he's pushing the country in the direction of the state of socialized democracy most of the Western world is in. This healthcare bill is a mixture of socialism (telling businesses what they can and can't do) and capitalism (still relying on private insurance rather than making a public plan) and if conservatives would drop that pesky article "a" they'd be totally right. Obama is socialist.

It also goes against the foundations of what the US is supposed to stand for - capitalism, free enterprise, a 'fend for yourself' mentality...going back and looking at the history of Medicare, Social Security, labor unions, minimum wage, etc. there was always a group that stood up and said "This is not American" and they were right...but each time it's been shown that taking a more moderate stance between socialism and capitalism has benefitted the nation, but also made it less uniquely "American."

The US is in a rough spot, it holds most of the military burden of the Western world - and honestly, anyone who says "just lower military spending, no other country has a huge army that gets involved in everything" really needs to STFU and realize that the reason no other country has to, is because we're doing it for them. Without any military threat from the west, just imagine what would happen between Israel and its neighbors. Pakistan and India. We're not "like other countries" in that we don't have the luxury of focusing solely on our domestic problems and letting someone else take care of the nasty bits, and the push to make the US identical to those countries in many ways is destroying what makes it unique.

Personally, I believe healthcare is a right, and I think we need to find a way to make it work. But anyone who says it's easy because other countries are able to do it really needs to do a bit of comparison regarding size, population, demographics, military responsibility, and sociology - we're not a unified nation and those things that do make us "uniquely American" as opposed to a landmass of people sharing citizenship ARE being changed. Even basic constitutional rights - the right to hold a gun for example - are being challenged, and while we still have the legal right to free speech, we no longer have the social right.

So yeah, I feel a bit of sympathy for tea partiers, and I really get where they're coming from. I think they're wrong in their knee-jerk reaction toward socialism, I don't think they'd be willing to give up most socialist policies we have (which, for the record, would include public, taxpayer funded schools) and I think it's a fair sign of indoctrination that the word 'socialism' alone can stir up such strong reactions. But as far as America changing, from what it was to what it will be...they're right. And it's a huge change, one that shouldn't be taken lightly.





thornhappy -> RE: Democrats express safety concerns after protests (3/24/2010 6:12:26 PM)

No, he means the '60s.  Weather Underground, SLA, stuff like that (and that was called terrorism).  Then we could also get into hijackings that were common in the late '60s and into the '70s.

Regarding capitalism, we've seen several times since the late '80s just what happens when you let markets run unfettered.  Corporations, banks, etc. look out for their own interests, which may or may not coincide with the public interest.

(fast reply)
Would you folks behind the walls with guns really advocate killing members of the government?  Or just Democrats in the community (after all we're the demonic souls who helped elect the Commie/Nazi/Socialist/Kenyan/Terrorist Obama).  Shouldn't we be fair game too?

Don't like the policies, vote 'em out of office.  Folks who complained about Bush were accused of having "Bush Derangement Syndrome", ya don't want to go that way, eh?




jlf1961 -> RE: Democrats express safety concerns after protests (3/24/2010 6:46:35 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: thornhappy

Violence has been a topic since the campaign, when folks said there would be riots in the streets if Obama was elected.

I was wondering (since I only listen to these guys in a blue moon), did Beck or Limbaugh mention the epithets, spitting, or window breaking this week?  I haven't heard anything at work mentioned by folks who listen to him daily




Nope, but Beck mentioned people picking up guns and talked revolution...




jlf1961 -> RE: Democrats express safety concerns after protests (3/24/2010 6:48:24 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


The political mood was ugly before Obama ever came on the scene Ven, though Obama's fist pumps and Pelosi's witch-like cackling for having beaten the majority of Americans who were solidly opposed to this bill hasn't helped the political mood of the country at all.

When the Democrats tell the majority to go fuck themselves, then they should expect a certain amount of anger. Its as it should be. The only thing really surprising here, is the surprise...


quote:

ORIGINAL: Vendaval

The political mood in this country has turned nasty and there is a looming sense of violence. That is not a solution.



Sanity, that does not mean that violence or threats should be condoned.




servantforuse -> RE: Democrats express safety concerns after protests (3/24/2010 6:51:55 PM)

The revolution will come in seven months in early November. It will be done with ballots and not pitchforks..




slvemike4u -> RE: Democrats express safety concerns after protests (3/24/2010 6:56:11 PM)

News Flash,.....angry Americans incensed by the sight of their President "fist-bumping" have started a civil war.The inner cities are in flames and armorys have been looted...it appears the American experiment is over.....all of it brought to an end by a fist bump.




Sanity -> RE: Democrats express safety concerns after protests (3/24/2010 6:57:19 PM)


The USA is approaching a population of 310,000,000 people and out of that number how many threats have been recorded. Just a few, correct? What that tells me is that its a little premature to be reaching for the panic button.

There is a lot of anger out there but, like me, most people are satisfied to show their contempt at the polls - and thats something to be grateful for.




LaTigresse -> RE: Democrats express safety concerns after protests (3/24/2010 7:02:58 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


The USA is approaching a population of 310,000,000 people and out of that number how many threats have been recorded. Just a few, correct? What that tells me is that its a little premature to be reaching for the panic button.

There is a lot of anger out there but, like me, most people are satisfied to show their contempt at the polls - and thats something to be grateful for.




For once Sanity and I agree on something!!!




Muirren -> RE: Democrats express safety concerns after protests (3/24/2010 7:13:21 PM)

I don't care for any of them, but I did vote for McCain because I considered him the lesser of two evils. I'll wager that most people are very sorry that they voted for that sob Obama bin Laden.




popeye1250 -> RE: Democrats express safety concerns after protests (3/24/2010 7:17:20 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


The USA is approaching a population of 310,000,000 people and out of that number how many threats have been recorded. Just a few, correct? What that tells me is that its a little premature to be reaching for the panic button.

There is a lot of anger out there but, like me, most people are satisfied to show their contempt at the polls - and thats something to be grateful for.



Sanity, I agree! I'll be offering the old folks rides to the polls if they need them. I think we really need to put our size 12's down come Nov.




pahunkboy -> RE: Democrats express safety concerns after protests (3/24/2010 7:20:07 PM)

wouldn't it be easier to release a bio germ?


sickly people - will be home in bed sick- not rioting and protesting.




thishereboi -> RE: Democrats express safety concerns after protests (3/24/2010 7:23:09 PM)

quote:

If you have a problem with this fact, then I suggest you change political parties or become independent.


Ok, but first you will have to name one party that doesn't have a some violent, racist morons in it.




slvemike4u -> RE: Democrats express safety concerns after protests (3/24/2010 7:28:37 PM)

Yeah Muirren,better if we had McCain and the Fox commentator at  the helm.
I for one would be sleeping easier at night ,though that would leave a vacumm over at fox...wouldn't it? [8|]




Muirren -> RE: Democrats express safety concerns after protests (3/24/2010 7:31:44 PM)

Not nearly as bad as the vacuum in your head!




slvemike4u -> RE: Democrats express safety concerns after protests (3/24/2010 7:49:13 PM)

There's a vacuum in my head? Funny I don't hear one...tell you what you explain to me how you have reached that conclusion and I will consider the possibility.
Does that sound like a fair deal?




Thadius -> RE: Democrats express safety concerns after protests (3/24/2010 7:52:23 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

Yeah Muirren,better if we had McCain and the Fox commentator at  the helm.
I for one would be sleeping easier at night ,though that would leave a vacumm over at fox...wouldn't it? [8|]

I was going to start a thread about it but fuck, this seems like a good place to say what I have to say.

Let us look at last week. It started out with us condemning Israel for announcing they are wanting to build some new apartment buildings while the VP was visiting, we basicly ignored Russia stating that they WILL be building a nuclear plant in Iran while the Sect of State was visiting, and finished up with the patchwork mess that is now law.

You don't think there is something fundamentally wrong with that picture? My friend I cannot say whether or not we would be better off with McOldfuck and Carribou Barbie in office, but I for one would feel a bit safer than I do with President Obama and the Human Gaffe machine.

Where do I express my safety concerns after the past week?




TreasureKY -> RE: Democrats express safety concerns after protests (3/24/2010 7:56:50 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

There's a vacuum in my head? Funny I don't hear one...


There is no sound in a vacuum.

Just saying...  [;)]

(Sorry, Mike... I just couldn't resist the opening.  [:)])




pahunkboy -> RE: Democrats express safety concerns after protests (3/24/2010 8:02:55 PM)

McCain will not fix anything.

I promise you that.


It is all a SCAM!

McCain just tried to get rid of vitamins and supplements. He is jsut saying he is against this because he is up for re-election- and there is competition this election cycle.

He can not be trusted.




Muirren -> RE: Democrats express safety concerns after protests (3/24/2010 8:21:15 PM)

As TreasureKY said, there is no sound in a vacuum, and you were the first to use the term, you ignoramus. A vacuum means void, nothing, nada,,as in "the lab called and your brain is ready."




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875