RE: TOS

Collarspace Discussion Forums

Home Login Search

RE: TOS

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: TOS

Page: << < prev 4 5 6 7 [8]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: TOS - 3/28/2010 1:35:38 PM

thornhappy

Posts: 8596
Joined: 12/16/2006
Status: offline

* huff huff *

Here I've been asking for a cock pic, a real, one-eyed cock shot, and you've never sent one.

* hrumph *

quote:

ORIGINAL: Level

quote:

ORIGINAL: VideoAdminAlpha

THat's not what you sent me......I got g-rated...I dont normally wanna see, but since I know what the rest of you looks like....show me the money honey!!! I wanna see the goods !!! (please??)

VAA, the same big dick pic I sent ydd is on the way to you

(in reply to Level)

Profile

Post #: 141

RE: TOS - 3/28/2010 1:47:11 PM

marie2

Posts: 1690
Joined: 11/4/2008
From: Jersey
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeffff

You just need to understand, that in the end, they can do what they want.

Your choice is to stay or go

subbieboy

(in reply to Jeffff)

Profile

Post #: 142

RE: TOS - 3/28/2010 1:49:38 PM

Level

Posts: 25145
Joined: 3/3/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: yourdarkdesire

careful Levellypoo - sending THAT pic to a mod could get you .... well ..... moderated!

She was amazed with it!

quote:

Soul:

Level,

Are you still trying to see if you can get your dick into everyone's box? I thought you let go of that idea a couple years ago *winks*

If the dick fits, and all that, you know... It's good to see you back here!

Now..... to send thorny some c-mail...

< Message edited by Level -- 3/28/2010 1:51:32 PM >

_____________________________

Fake the heat and scratch the itch
Skinned up knees and salty lips
Let go it's harder holding on
One more trip and I'll be gone

~~ Stone Temple Pilots

(in reply to yourdarkdesire)

Profile

Post #: 143

RE: TOS - 3/28/2010 3:26:43 PM

Termyn8or

Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005
Status: offline

Actually I don't think you need three neurosurgeons to do this. There is the thingy for inserting a picture, just insert the text "Please limit filesize to less than 200KB". Possibly go on to say "Files larger than 200KB may be deleted" unless they are really really good or whatever.

I think something like that would be reasonable and not so hard to implement, or perhaps 200KB is too much, that's not up to me, it's more what the system can handle. I don't kno how or why these limitations exist, but for example I am in a professional website pretty much for work. It actually costs money, and the limit for a shared file in X MB. Now we are talking 2,000 page service manuals in some cases, and sometimes the need to be proken up by Winrar or some other compression software. I think the limit is something like 20MB. What I don't understand there is why it is OK to upload three 15MB files for Winrar to reassemble, but it won't take the whole file at once. The net result is the same, the bandwidth, disk usage and processing power required to service the function doesn't really change. Yet the limitation exists.

However inserting picture is a diffent thing, as it's not going to come down to "Click here to reassemble the file and display it in a new window" because that would wreck the whole thing.

Actually we could all send in some money and CM could get better servers, a few more terabytes and maybe even a faster connection if one is available, but everybody is broke these days so so much for that. Plus they seem to have a real aversion to charging, which is a good thing.

Realize this, an animated GIF contains each and every frame of the animation. That means one picture could contain one, or a thousand frames. I had Microsoft GIF animator and I saw what happens to the filesize when you put one together, and the compression is not all that good. You could hit 200 KB real quick.

T

(in reply to ModeratorSixteen)

Profile

Post #: 144

RE: TOS - 3/28/2010 3:31:10 PM

ThatDamnedPanda

Posts: 6060
Joined: 1/26/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or

Actually I don't think you need three neurosurgeons to do this. There is the thingy for inserting a picture, just insert the text "Please limit filesize to less than 200KB".

They already do that, which is why this thread kind of surprises me. I thought file size was already limited.

_____________________________

Panda, panda, burning bright
In the forest of the night
What immortal hand or eye
Made you all black and white and roly-poly like that?

(in reply to Termyn8or)

Profile

Post #: 145

RE: TOS - 3/28/2010 3:44:43 PM

WyldHrt

Posts: 6412
Joined: 6/5/2008
Status: offline

quote:

They already do that, which is why this thread kind of surprises me. I thought file size was already limited.

Not sure, Panda, and not really willing to risk the "Wrath of Mod" to find out.

That said, I suspect that the sheer number of gifs being posted contributed greatly to the forum slowdown. Most folks post pics once in a while, but the OP seemed to be doing it in nearly every post, and often more than one animation per post. Then, others would quote the posts, animation included, putting more of a drain on the servers.

The ability to post pics is nice, but like anything else allowed here, it can be abused. If the users all went apeshit and started peppering the forum with a crapload of large pics, I suspect the rule would be changed pretty quickly and pics disallowed entirely. From what I've seen in this thread, the Mods don't want that. The best course seems to be for the users to show some self control, and not abuse the pic function.

< Message edited by WyldHrt -- 3/28/2010 3:46:22 PM >

_____________________________

"MotherFUCKER!" is NOT a safeword!!"- Steel
"We've had complaints about 'orgy noises'. This is not the neighborhood for that kind of thing"- PVE Cop

Resident "Hypnotic Eyes", "Cleavage" and "Toy Whore"
Subby Mafia, VAA Posse & Team Troll!

(in reply to ThatDamnedPanda)

Profile

Post #: 146

RE: TOS - 3/28/2010 5:58:53 PM

ModTwentyOne

Posts: 2504
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or

"Please limit filesize to less than 200KB". Possibly go on to say "Files larger than 200KB may be deleted" unless they are really really good or whatever.

If people do not read, and do not heed, notices in big red letters that say DO NOT SEND MONEY TO OTHER USERS FOR ANY REASON, do you really think they are going to read, and heed, anything else? There is, in fact, a file size limit on the upload box; however, whether that limit is too high or is even a customizable notice is not within my area.

Perhaps I was not clear before: We do not consider this a site problem that needs to be resolved. We consider this to be one person's problem that appears to be resolved at this time.

_____________________________

If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice.

(in reply to Termyn8or)

Profile

Post #: 147

RE: TOS - 3/28/2010 6:36:52 PM

Termyn8or

Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005
Status: offline

Nice to meet you 21. I remember what it was like to be 21, and nothing is the same.

At any rate, yes, the feature is enabled and only a few have a problem with it. Not so long ago embedded picture were not allowed at al IIRC. Perhaps this thread points to the reason.

I don't speak in videos, and I don't even have flash on this PC so all the youtube links are useless to me for the most part. I have to go to another PC to view them, and I would suggest that anything posted based mainly on a video in a link should be highlighted or something, then every so often I'll go to my main PC and take a look.

Even then youtube warns me that they are phasing out support for my browser, and I am not updating it. If they want to cut me out of their "market" that is fine, then I see no videos. I have reached a state of something or another. I have mucho media and players that'll play damnear anything, and it keep bugging me to update Mediaplayer. No friggin way, then it looks for licenses before it plays anything. Fuck that.

But my position must be based on my own tenets, personally I don't care if no pictures were allowed at all because I don't use that function. But that doesn't mean I can say screw you all who want to post pictures.

T

(in reply to ModTwentyOne)

Profile

Post #: 148

RE: TOS - 3/28/2010 8:34:26 PM

ReflectiveSoul2

Posts: 37
Joined: 3/27/2010
Status: offline

Yeah, I figured I hadda come back and give you guys some crud * grins*.... good to see ya doll *hugs*

(in reply to Level)

Profile

Post #: 149