Thadius
Posts: 5091
Joined: 10/11/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Real0ne Evenin, well I did not post either of the threads on the subject but I am well informed on the topic and did explain it accordingly. So I am not "pushing it" as such unless you mean that my views agree with "The Rule of Law" rather than the abuses that are going on in the trust and debtor creditor world with these invisible contracts. For instance by the time they get done hypothecating a lousy traffic ticket they will hypothecate it up to 2 million bucks. Its all about money not justice, they want your money, that was the sole reason for the patriot act. The problem is that the better people behave the more they have to impose on and into peoples lives to fuel the system. Its just history repeating itself.... Its really a lot easier to get them to take their oath and put it on record because that is a pure clear cut violation of the public trust that even people who have zippo understanding of the law can immediately connect with. Trying to get them out when they violate your rights in office has a huge delay (for governors) by the time you run it through court and ......... Judges are the most important imo, because they can and do collude to dismiss evidence for your defense. If you are fighting another party not related to the government then you might get a fair hearing but anytime you go up against the government they stack that deck so high against you that you cant see the top. Militia? I think you are confused with another thread. This about fighting with pen and paper and with backing from the existing provost marshal. Be careful about what ron says because he enjoys completely mischaracterizing issues that run contrary to the fraudulent government we now enjoy that does not understand the word "re-present". Do you believe that the only tool to defend the constitution at the hands of a militia are weapons? I believe that the pen and the ballot are the primary tools to be taken in hand. I just worry that too many folks will take the extreme stance of believing that the best way to institute change is via violent revolution. Don't be mistaken, if the day ever comes that it is the only way to guarantee the constitution is defended, I will stand my post. On the other hand, when you spout off with the same thing over and over, even when it doesn't apply to the topic or subject being discussed, it only detracts from some of the message that you are trying to get across. Whether I agree with it or not, the message becomes lost when the messenger acts like a drunken crack addict with a stutter. Know what I mean?
_____________________________
When the character of a man is not clear to you, look at his friends." ~ Japanese Proverb
|