Thadius
Posts: 5091
Joined: 10/11/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: brainiacsub Thad, it's a no brainer that Conservative politics is about maintaining the status quo in favor of white men. Conservatives say they believe in equality for all and therefore laws and policy should be "race neutral" however they refuse to acknowledge that the playing field isn't level to begin with. They tend to believe that everyone should just pull themselves up by their own bootstraps. Two recent examples from posters in this forum: domi mentioned that Merc wouldn't be a successful banker in he were black and grew up in the Chicago public school system. It was tongue in cheek but there was alot of truth to that statement yesterday Popeye couldn't believe that racism still exists because there were laws against it These are just two examples but there are many As for my religious discrimination statement, it's no secret that Conservatives (most, but not all) tend to favor public displays of faith and policies that favor Christianity. Libertarians shouldn't, but every Libertarian I've met or spoken with from CM does, so I was curious about it. Thanks for the clarification. Just a couple of examples of where I think your theory falls a bit short. How many minorities were in high profile positions of power under the previous administration (loosely referring to it as a conservative administration)? It had the first 2 black Sect of State, the first black woman Sect of State. I know quite a few folks, including my sisters, who were black and went through the Chicago Public School system and are quite sucessful. My understanding of Merc's position is that we shouldn't be trying to hold back successful folks so that less successful folks can catch up. I am a strong believer in private charity, and even offering training and mentorship to folks that don't have the same oppurtunities because of logistics. I just don't believe that it should be the government's job to decide who should or shouldn't succeed or fail for that matter. The most important lessons I have learned in life have come from failing and being allowed to fail. If we remove risk of failure from the equation, what incentive is there to push forward? Why institutionalize a mentality of settling for mediocrity? There is even a bit of hypocracy to the way the government helps folks, take 2 black women, both the mothers of 2, one is married the other is single, which do you think would have a better chance of getting assistance if they became pregnant again or lost their jobs? I can tell you right now that the single mother would have a better chance of getting government assistance than the married woman. As far as the religious displays in public venues, well they are as old if not older than this nation is. They shouldn't be even in the jurisdiction of the fed, unless on federal property, and even then those displays should be allowed under the First Ammendment, for all religions, and even non religious folks. I personally think the SCOTUS legilsated from the bench in their changing the rather simple language of the establishment clause to mean "seperation of religion and state", and even further with the way they have forced the removal of various monuments and memorials because of a "religious" message being on them. Overall, I feel that the government has no room in my or anybody elses lives, unless we are infringing on somebody elses rights. Know what I mean?
_____________________________
When the character of a man is not clear to you, look at his friends." ~ Japanese Proverb
|