Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

Female Fetishists?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Mistress >> Female Fetishists? Page: [1] 2 3   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Female Fetishists? - 4/8/2010 1:42:53 AM   
VaguelyCurious


Posts: 5264
Joined: 12/2/2009
From: United Kingdom
Status: offline
This is inspired by the most recent Feminization thread, and the current thread about cam performance.

Quite often men come to the forum, sole kink in hand (and maybe something else in the other hand, but that's a story for a *whole* different thread...). They get shouted down with something along the lines of 'You're a fetishist! Women don't want fetishists, we want relationships!'

Is that really true, or might we just be saying it because it's an easy putdown? Is it a particular quirk of this board that there happens not to be any female fetishists here? (*are* there any female fetishists here?)

If it does exist, how might female fetishism differ from male fetishism? *Is* there a difference-is it a wiring thing?

I honestly have no clue what the answer to this question is, and I have no idea what y'all are going to say to this one...

('This is a really stupid question' is a valid response-I have a sneaking suspicion it might be accurate, but I'm asking anyway just in case it turns out to be a really insightful, provocative question ).

<edited because the phrase 'they get shouted' is meaningless when it isn't followed by a word like 'down'...>


< Message edited by VaguelyCurious -- 4/8/2010 2:10:02 AM >


_____________________________

Sthetic on FetLife.



Profile   Post #: 1
RE: Female Fetishists? - 4/8/2010 2:44:52 AM   
LadyPact


Posts: 32566
Status: offline
I don't think it's a stupid question.  I happen to think it's a very good one and very similar to something that I've been turning around in My head the last few days. 

To your direct question, I do happen to think that it weighs more heavily as being true than an easy put down.  The genders really do differ on how easily kink, sex, or common fetishes can be obtained.  Darn near any reasonably attractive woman can go to the local bar (pub for you) and get laid.  If a female Dominant is even fair in the art of seduction, not only can she get sex, she can have at least a hint of kink as well.  This removes the obsession/compulsion cycle that seems to come up when a person can't get their sexual wants fulfilled.  The very definition of fetish -
A sexual fixation on a concept, object, or body part. A person with a fetish feels a compulsive need to use the object in order to obtain sexual gratification, and cannot achieve pleasure without it. ...  When that's not happening, there is a greater craving and the more it's craved, the more a person focuses on it.

This is the very reason why females don't hinge on fetishes the way that males do.  While I do have fetishes, it just isn't that hard to find someone willing to comply.  That means that I don't have to have a fixation on them because I'm not getting them.  This isn't especially the case the other way around.  Consider when the situation is not only the gender difference between male and female, but also the do-er, rather than do-ee factor.  It's a hell of a lot easier to put a blindfold or cuffs on someone, than to talk a person into taking charge of what is happening, and maybe get them to use the same implements when someone is the receiver.

As I said earlier, I've been thinking of something connected to your original over the past few days.  Actually, it was somewhat inspired by the same threads you mention here.  Since it seems to Me that more Dominant women who frequent this site do tend to be relationship, rather than fetish based, I do have to wonder if some male fetishists would be better off if they were directed to specialty/fetish based sites.  CM, while open to everyone who has any interest in kink, might not necessarily be the best resource for someone who is very focused on a particular fetish.  I have to wonder if sites like Fetlife or sites dedicated to a singular fetish (foot worship, feminiztion, whatever) might be more receptive for those specifically needing that type of support.

If anything, they are both intriguing questions.


_____________________________

The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT

Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD

Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie.

Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread

(in reply to VaguelyCurious)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: Female Fetishists? - 4/8/2010 3:04:58 AM   
MsMillgrove


Posts: 260
Joined: 5/27/2008
Status: offline
once i asked a guy who was pretending to be a sub.. but really only wanted some mildly kinky play in the bedroom--why'd you come to CM? And he gave an honest answer--one that seems obvious, but I'd never considered. "Email is free, here." Cause he belonged at Match.com, but email is not free over there.

So there's lot of men in CM who are as you say... fetishists and they get shot down for not wanting to have a d/s relationship. There's no choices that allow anyone, male or female, to identify as a "top" "botton" or as a "kinkster". If a woman comes to CM who really only wants to have her boots licked, or wants her partner to wear a mask..while they play about under the covers.. well who would know? What would she be doing in a forum called "Ask a Mistress"?

I suspect that female fetishists connect pretty quickly with the non-subby guys who just want to play.. they dont' have to waste time...they're only here for their kink--and if judging by the reams of mail i've gotten from males who are looking for the same action--they probably get so many choices of kinky males, they hardly have time to answer mail, let alone post.

And perhaps some Ladies in this forum are a bit like me. I have my fetish--a few of them. And i like mine so well, that I will play with someone I have no interest in establishing any relationship outside the dungeon--because he is good at it. I would never bother to go thru the hassles of
dealing with a CM male.. the email, the phone, the meet where they probably don't show up...to get what I want.. because I don't need to waste time, I can go to the dungeon and find the person who I discovered knows how to satisfy me.

That doesn't mean that I am not keenly interested in finding the male sub who suits me. I am just realistic in thinking it's unlikely they'll match to me in this small fetish.. I don't need them for that. I can get it elsewhere. So I think it's possible to be both fetishist and domme. I make a deal with my dungeon playmate to let me "play" his mistress. It's only pretend but I'd rather have it that way...becasue in that short time while he satisfies me.. I really do temporarily own a piece of him.

(in reply to VaguelyCurious)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: Female Fetishists? - 4/8/2010 4:00:42 AM   
Domin8tingUrDrmz


Posts: 1269
Joined: 4/8/2006
From: Portland Metro, Oregon
Status: offline
I have a varied range of sexual quirks and non-sexual quirks, some of which many consider kinky. I do not consider any of them actual fetishes because I am quite capable of *getting off* without those quirks. Since I enjoy such a variety, I can almost always incorporate something that I enjoy without having to fixate on any one given activity or body part.

Most of the men I've met in my lifetime thus far (not all of them, thankfully) generally have one or two preferred things and like to repeat them indefinately. Whereas I get bored with repetition and need variety. Maybe variety is my fetish...lol.

I certainly don't yell 'fetishist' just for an easy put down. I *have* met enough men in my lifetime where variety was just as important to them as it is to me. Since I have met men who enjoy variety such as I do, I simply won't settle for less. Why should I? I enjoy being in charge of my home, and of those with whom I share intimate relationships. I see no point in catering to someone's fetish when I can have more. That seems rather limiting - even if their fetish is something I enjoy immensely, over time that thing would seem tedious rather than fulfilling.

I do think that those who are more fetishistic in nature would be better off on another site such as Fet, or visiting a Pro, or godforbid become a dominant themselves and order their submissive to satisfy their kink...lol. CollarMe is more geared toward those who seek D/s, or M/s, or even Gor for that matter. To me, a fetishist seems like a dominant-bottom demanding something be done to them. I have no interest in an intimate relationship with such a person.

_____________________________

4 out of 3 people have trouble with fractions.

Ask a Mistress Forum FAQ
Profile Help

(in reply to VaguelyCurious)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: Female Fetishists? - 4/8/2010 4:24:52 AM   
OttersSwim


Posts: 2860
Joined: 9/1/2008
Status: offline
A difficult question to answer without pretty big generalizations I think.

My belief is that being a female Dominant on CM is a bit like working in a prison.  You see a lot of males who could not successfully navigate their kinks, whereas the actual majority of men navigate it just fine.  A bit of a skewed perspective and I encourage you all to get a breath of fresh air every now and again and look at other males so you don't become jaded.  We are not -all- bad you know. 

I think that there are indeed female fetishists and the difference between males and females (again, generalizations are impossible to avoid here) come in how they pursue their fetish.  I believe that the majority of women couch their fetish in the context of a relationship with another person and thereby are much more inclined to "give-in-order-to-get" their kink fulfilled.

Socialization plays big into this I think and so will vary woman to woman and of course, man to man.  But I think that the concept of give-in-order-to-get comes harder to some guys.

Then there is the difference in how they choose to present those fetishes - OMG this is a huge generalization!: 

Male = in-your-face-with-my-kink

Female = not-so-much

I wonder why that is...is it because the sexual power generally lies with the woman? Geez...I should stop typing...I am generalizing myself into outer space....heeeeelllllppppppmmmmmeeeeeeesssssspppppoooooccccckkkkkk!!!!!!!



p.s.  you gotta admit, we -do- see a lot of guys here with that in your face kink demand energy and almost no women...

< Message edited by OttersSwim -- 4/8/2010 4:25:38 AM >


_____________________________

I am on a journey of authenticity and self.

(in reply to VaguelyCurious)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: Female Fetishists? - 4/8/2010 7:10:16 AM   
DarkSteven


Posts: 28072
Joined: 5/2/2008
Status: offline
I will put down men who are fixated on one specific fetish.  I would put down women who did the same, but they're few and far between.  I suspect that they have an easier time finding a compatible man that a man does a woman.

_____________________________

"You women....

The small-breasted ones want larger breasts. The large-breasted ones want smaller ones. The straight-haired ones curl their hair, and the curly-haired ones straighten theirs...

Quit fretting. We men love you."

(in reply to OttersSwim)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: Female Fetishists? - 4/8/2010 8:19:14 AM   
diaperedbaby


Posts: 158
Joined: 3/13/2005
Status: offline
I think it depends on the crowd you are talking to. I notice here that any kinks discussed here that are deemed off the wall, there is usually a list of attacks that follow or why THEY aren't into something. The women that I have talked to on this site and others with specific interests wouldn't post or ask questions here for that very reason. As mentioned, they tend to wait until a relationship develops or go to a specific site like fetlife or a fetish specific site to correspond about a singular fetish/kink that they are into or curious about.

(in reply to DarkSteven)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: Female Fetishists? - 4/8/2010 9:17:19 AM   
LadyHibiscus


Posts: 27124
Joined: 8/15/2005
From: Island Of Misfit Toys
Status: offline
Excellent question, VC!! I have a few fetishes... number one? OBEDIENCE! Not uber-kinky perhaps, but the thrill I get from someone just following my orders without question **because they choose to** is actually above the sight of blood running from a wound I created.

I love lots of play things... but they are not as essential to me as an actual "fetish" seems to be to many of the men. Those activities excite me, but they're not essential to my sexual pleasure. Honestly, I think it's a hardwiring thing. Cheap excuse, but there ya go!



_____________________________

[page 23 girl]



(in reply to diaperedbaby)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: Female Fetishists? - 4/8/2010 9:22:09 AM   
LadyNTrainer


Posts: 1584
Joined: 5/20/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: VaguelyCurious
Quite often men come to the forum, sole kink in hand (and maybe something else in the other hand, but that's a story for a *whole* different thread...). They get shouted down with something along the lines of 'You're a fetishist! Women don't want fetishists, we want relationships!'

Is that really true, or might we just be saying it because it's an easy putdown? Is it a particular quirk of this board that there happens not to be any female fetishists here? (*are* there any female fetishists here?)

If it does exist, how might female fetishism differ from male fetishism? *Is* there a difference-is it a wiring thing?


For starters, at least the early comprehensive surveys on the subject, for whatever they may have been worth, suggest that true fetishism is an almost exclusively male domain.  How much this has to do with socialization versus sexually dimorphic brain wiring versus who actually cops to their kinky shit when a sex researcher is asking questions is arguable. 

The differential that counts in terms of how a fetishist will be treated socially on an adult site is how they treat others.  We've all seen the "I WANT, DO ME, GIMME" approach where someone comes online literally prepared to treat other people like props for their own self-centered gratification.   The approach isn't strictly sex-linked; occasionally women do it too.  Regardless of the gender of the operator, or what they are demanding from others, the social approach itself is rude and offensive.  If you remove sex from the equation entirely and substitute someone coming online to, say, an academic community, demanding in the same clueless manner for others to share their research results, you're likely to see a similar effect in the response they receive.  The stranger who comes with his hand out, or in this case with his dick out, is well advised to walk softly and to make friends in the community first.

Fetishes are intrinsically acceptable and normal on an adult site.  Social cluelessness and self centered demands to strangers are not likely to go over well in any context, and the fact that it is sexual intimacy that is being demanded is likely to significantly exacerbate the social issues.

Male and female social and communication strategies also tend to be different, though there are cultural variants on the differences.  Brusque demand followed by refusal and then partial negotiation is not an uncommon male strategy, but it is a relatively uncommon female one.  More typical female strategies involve communication, an offer of cooperation or common interest, and alliance forming prior to making demands.  Male strategies are likely to be perceived as childish, unsophisticated or irrational by females, whereas female strategies may be perceived as needless, overly troublesome, too chatty, trivial or irrational by males.   These are generalizations, as there are very few individuals who display purely male or purely female communication patterns.  But doubtless they do contribute to the social and communication gap that is evident when a male fetishist shows up here and uses the "I WANT, DO ME, GIMME, ME, ME, ME!" strategy. 

There are female fetishists, in both the clinical and vernacular usages of the term.  The former are probably rare; the latter are actually common as I doubt there are too many women on this site who don't enjoy kinky or fetish activities of one sort or another.  The difference is not in their sexual preferences, but with whom they are willing to indulge.  Males are less likely to be intensively discriminating about their sexual partners, so they are more often willing to approach by leading with their kink and ignoring interpersonal relationships.  They do not appear willing or interested in taking time to get to know a person and determine their fitness and compatibility before engaging in sexual behavior with them.  This usually results in truly spectacular failure, since relatively few females are more interested in getting their rocks off in a specific way with a random stranger than they are interested in finding a high quality partner to do it with.   Males who do not lead with "Look, I am a high quality partner and I have good social skills" are intrinsically handicapped with females, as a general rule.

To take the analogy a couple of clades back in evolutionary history, this is why male animals carry the burden - sometimes as a physical part of them - of making visible displays of their health, fitness, strength and willingness to exert energy and spend scarce resources to please the female.  Males want to mate; females want to mate selectively.  The fundamental male strategy is "if it moves, stick my dick in it".  The fundamental female strategy is "Avoid mating until I am convinced he is worthy".  Obviously this is a gross oversimplification when it comes to describing the complex and highly polymorphic courtship strategies of Homo sapiens, but it's still relevant to what we're looking at here. 


_____________________________

Your dominant Personal Trainer for fitness and body shaping in the lifestyle. Let my fetish be your motivation.

(in reply to VaguelyCurious)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: Female Fetishists? - 4/8/2010 10:36:47 AM   
SweetDommes


Posts: 3313
Joined: 10/5/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: OttersSwim

My belief is that being a female Dominant on CM is a bit like working in a prison.  You see a lot of males who could not successfully navigate their kinks, whereas the actual majority of men navigate it just fine.  A bit of a skewed perspective and I encourage you all to get a breath of fresh air every now and again and look at other males so you don't become jaded.  We are not -all- bad you know. 


OMG, have you ever worked in a prison? You are completely right (even though I never connected the two). It's a sense of desperation, I think - the guys in prison will hit on anything with the right anatomy ... if it's got boobs and/or lacks a cock, they'll hit on it. I've often wished that they would pick some kind of standard so that it would be less creepy. i.e. only hit on the blonds, or the older women, or the younger women, or the x, y, or z ... but instead, they hit on everything - which is a lot like some of the subs around here. They don't care who they hit on/message, because they don't care about the person, only what that person will do for/to them.

_____________________________

Miss Karen and Miss Holly

Earth is the insane asylum for the universe.

Friends are God's apology for relatives

(in reply to OttersSwim)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: Female Fetishists? - 4/8/2010 10:49:55 AM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline
Truly absorbing and interesting post, LadyN. However:

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyNTrainer
The fundamental male strategy is "if it moves, stick my dick in it". 


Now I'm depressed. I thought that I was like all other men in only wanting to 'stick my dick into' a woman I found attractive. I have to wonder now whether I'm actually a psychologically-disturbed male who has developed a fetish for attractive women.


< Message edited by PeonForHer -- 4/8/2010 10:50:19 AM >


_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to LadyNTrainer)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: Female Fetishists? - 4/8/2010 11:13:32 AM   
OttersSwim


Posts: 2860
Joined: 9/1/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

Truly absorbing and interesting post, LadyN. However:

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyNTrainer
The fundamental male strategy is "if it moves, stick my dick in it". 


Now I'm depressed. I thought that I was like all other men in only wanting to 'stick my dick into' a woman I found attractive. I have to wonder now whether I'm actually a psychologically-disturbed male who has developed a fetish for attractive women.



psshhh...you just want to show off your abs... 


_____________________________

I am on a journey of authenticity and self.

(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: Female Fetishists? - 4/8/2010 11:20:12 AM   
VaguelyCurious


Posts: 5264
Joined: 12/2/2009
From: United Kingdom
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyNTrainer

For starters, at least the early comprehensive surveys on the subject, for whatever they may have been worth, suggest that true fetishism is an almost exclusively male domain.  How much this has to do with socialization versus sexually dimorphic brain wiring versus who actually cops to their kinky shit when a sex researcher is asking questions is arguable.
I think this is what I was getting at in  my head-I did a quick google scholar search, but nothing too obvious came up, and I've forgotten everything the library ever taught me about how to look up papers on JSTOR. I'd be really interested in the research methods used in obtaining a blanket statement like that-I can't see how you would get around the bolded part.

quote:

There are female fetishists, in both the clinical and vernacular usages of the term.  The former are probably rare; the latter are actually common as I doubt there are too many women on this site who don't enjoy kinky or fetish activities of one sort or another.
The part of that paragraph which jumped out at me was 'one sort or another'; I have yet to come across a woman (either on here or in real life) who has a monodimensional kink, but I *have* come across men who do, and I was wondering if that was coincidence, or some kind of intrinsic wiring.


_____________________________

Sthetic on FetLife.




(in reply to LadyNTrainer)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: Female Fetishists? - 4/8/2010 11:22:41 AM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline
You say that again, and I'll start using a seriously repulsive butthole pic as my avatar, matey . . . . ;-)

_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to OttersSwim)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: Female Fetishists? - 4/8/2010 11:24:09 AM   
VaguelyCurious


Posts: 5264
Joined: 12/2/2009
From: United Kingdom
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

You say that again, and I'll start using a seriously repulsive butthole pic as my avatar, matey . . . . ;-)


No, you won't.

The abs are staying juuuuuust where they are.




_____________________________

Sthetic on FetLife.




(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: Female Fetishists? - 4/8/2010 11:44:23 AM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline
. . . And I think we also have to consider whether the term 'fetish' is itself defined in such a way that male predilections frequently fall under that rubric whereas women's seldom do.

To recall LadyPact's definition (identical to that found at www.ifsha.org/glossary htm) a fetish is "a sexual fixation on a concept, object, or body part. A person with a fetish feels a compulsive need to use the object in order to obtain sexual gratification, and cannot achieve pleasure without it. ...

'Objects' could include quite a wide array of things - such as men's wealth and material goods generally (fetishes which, incidentally, recall Marx's use of the term). A 'fetish' is usually assumed to be something that refers to a narrow, easily defined 'thing' or 'things' - shoes, underwear, and the like. CD seems to me to be a broader interest than the term 'fetish' seems entirely appropriately to cover. At what point does the fetish become so 'broad ranging' that the word is not longer appropriate?

'Concepts' could include male manners, charm, sensitivity, their ability to provide, to stay loyal - but also their social status and power (how many dommes have stated that they seek 'alpha males'?). . . . The list of such 'concepts' could be endless.

And, I think we all have to accept that the desire to submit, or to dominate, is quite frequently referred to as a 'fetish' by those outside the D/s community.



< Message edited by PeonForHer -- 4/8/2010 11:49:44 AM >


_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to VaguelyCurious)
Profile   Post #: 16
RE: Female Fetishists? - 4/8/2010 11:50:25 AM   
SweetDommes


Posts: 3313
Joined: 10/5/2004
Status: offline
Even using your 'concepts' theory, Peon, I don't know of many women who have a true fetish (meaning they HAVE to have it or they can't achieve pleasure) for anything. Yeah, it would be nice to have a guy with lots of cash on hand, who has a certain level of social status ... but that would just be a bonus. For me, I love to make boys blush - it turns me on, and makes everything better ... can I have sex without making the boy blush first? Of course - and it will be fun, too. I do know some women who won't sleep with anyone who doesn't have x amount of cash in the bank and a certain car and a house with so many rooms - but I don't think it's a fetish as much as being shallow, selfish, gold-digging, money-grubbers.

I just don't think that women fixate on any one thing as much as guys seem to - sub/Dom/vanilla, men just seem to fixate on certain things than women do.

_____________________________

Miss Karen and Miss Holly

Earth is the insane asylum for the universe.

Friends are God's apology for relatives

(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 17
RE: Female Fetishists? - 4/8/2010 11:58:23 AM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline
quote:

Even using your 'concepts' theory, Peon, I don't know of many women who have a true fetish (meaning they HAVE to have it or they can't achieve pleasure) for anything. Yeah, it would be nice to have a guy with lots of cash on hand, who has a certain level of social status


Lordy, SD - great that you're not like that - but, let's face it, a fair few women are! On the other hand, I've heard of men who get turned on by the thought of rich women or who zero in on those with high social status, but I've never actually met one . . . .

Edited to add - it wasn't my 'concepts' theory - it was contained in the definition of 'fetish'. Just a small point.

< Message edited by PeonForHer -- 4/8/2010 12:00:09 PM >


_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to SweetDommes)
Profile   Post #: 18
RE: Female Fetishists? - 4/8/2010 12:23:49 PM   
SweetDommes


Posts: 3313
Joined: 10/5/2004
Status: offline
Yes yes, not yours - but you are the one who brought it up :-P

And I still maintain that it's not a true fetish for the women who seek out those of a certain income bracket and social standing. Most of the ones that I've met like that didn't get off on sex even with the guys who met their criteria ... they just weren't happy in general, and it affected all aspects of their lives. They were too busy thinking about what they were going to buy next to be bothered with such triffling things like "orgasm" ...

_____________________________

Miss Karen and Miss Holly

Earth is the insane asylum for the universe.

Friends are God's apology for relatives

(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 19
RE: Female Fetishists? - 4/8/2010 1:09:30 PM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: SweetDommes

Yes yes, not yours - but you are the one who brought it up :-P



Well, actually, LP brought it up. I just 'interrogated' the definition a bit.


quote:

And I still maintain that it's not a true fetish for the women who seek out those of a certain income bracket and social standing. Most of the ones that I've met like that didn't get off on sex even with the guys who met their criteria ... they just weren't happy in general, and it affected all aspects of their lives. They were too busy thinking about what they were going to buy next to be bothered with such triffling things like "orgasm" ...


Hmm. I've heard of a psychological test involving pictures of the same men who are described as 'doctors' to one set of women and 'painters' to another. Guess if there was a difference in whether women found them 'more physically attractive' when these men were labelled 'doctors' or 'painters'.

Anecdotally: I remember male colleagues at uni who'd suddenly find their fortunes with the ladies improving upon getting their PhDs. 'Woah - it's not Mr X anymore, it's Dr SeXy!' Not that they cared much, mind you - at least, not at first. On the other hand, I know a man who is 56th in line to the throne and is a Viscount. He never uses his title because, as he said, he hates 'women suddenly turning into fawning idiots' with him.

However, I'm sure that a British aristocratic title would have no effect at all on North American women. If a British man, travelling in the US, were to tell a woman that he was a viscount, I have no doubt that it would cut no ice whatsoever. I should tell my friend to visit North America and experience women who are utterly free of such snobbery.

_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to SweetDommes)
Profile   Post #: 20
Page:   [1] 2 3   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Mistress >> Female Fetishists? Page: [1] 2 3   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.125