CaringandReal -> RE: Beyond "the power to leave"--what is power, who has it, and how does it manifest itself? (4/9/2010 4:57:13 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: lucylucy There have been a few threads lately in which the idea that the submissive partner (sub, slave, property, etc.) has all the power in a D/s relationship has come up. The argument seems to go like this: because the s-partner can leave or withdraw consent at any time, he/she is the powerful one. Aside from the fact that a Dom can leave any time, too, I don't get the logic to the argument. As I explained it in one thread, I think equating "the power to leave" with "real power" is a mistake. Isn't that like saying that because my house would be worth a ton of money if I sold it, I have a lot of money? Only if I sell my house, which I don't plan to do. Up until the moment I sell the house, I have very little money (if any). I see the leaving as power thing similarly. Until the moment I leave, where's my power? In my mind, power is about control, and if all I can control is when I leave, I just don't see how that's "all the power" in the relationship. If I'm with someone for 20 years and for 20 years my power amounts to being able to leave, can it really be siad that for 20 years I had "all the power" in the relationship? I just don't see it. Furthermore, if the sub has "all the power," that means the Dom is powerless. Now that I really don't see. How do you define power? What do s-types and D-types do that demonstrate their power? Who has power in your relationship? I am especially curious about D-types feeling powerless and s-types feeling powerful in D/s relationships. This premise doesn't leave me with anything to say, but I'll say it anyway. ;) I'll try to keep it brief, so as to not derail the thread. Veto power is a very encompassing, effective, and extreme form of power. Ask any president. It's even more powerful in personal relationships where two people have fallen in love and become emotionally dependent on each other. To me, letting a slave have the power of leaving is letting that slave have all the power in the relationship. Anything left after that is a sham, an act, a "roleplay." I know this is a strong way of putting it. But it's how I experience it. "How do you define power?" As said above, veto power is a good part of my definition, in relationships and in politics. What's left is often persuasion or salemanship (which, while powerful in their own ways, are always chancy, always dependent upon someone else with stronger persuasion abilities not coming along) and "tricks" or deception, a form of power one generally thinks of (bad) submissives as in engaging in, not dominants. In a personal relationship, the power to stop something in its tracks will keep the other person in line, under control, whether they acknowlege it or not. So, for me, there is no power to define in the "sub can walk" relationship you describe. You know, I think that all "submissive can walk at any time" relationships should also have, for the dom, a "one strike and you're out" clause. It seems only fair!
|
|
|
|