RE: Tea Party target Stupak won't seek re-election (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


brainiacsub -> RE: Tea Party target Stupak won't seek re-election (4/9/2010 10:45:53 PM)

Well, at least Firm provided factual evidence of his position. Sanity's shit is just bizarre.




FirmhandKY -> RE: Tea Party target Stupak won't seek re-election (4/9/2010 10:50:53 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

quote:

ORIGINAL: brainiacsub

I'd like to add that you can't possibly believe that the cheering crowds and tons of adoration she received as VP candidate and the ensuing opportunity to make millions didn't factor in to that decision. I agree that she was unfairly targeted with false ethics claims and was spending her own money to defend herself, but she is a classic opportunist and hardly what I'd call a dedicated public servant.
Add to that she is a fucking politician and not for nothing but that is a breed of cat I have learned to be just a little skeptical of.
Damm right before popping over here I had the pleasure of reading Sanity's scathing rip and listing of all the reasons he distrusted a Frontline piece...and than I popped over here and Firm seems to be saying "because she said so".
Seems to me the deciding factor in both of these viewpoints is the desire to believe or disbelieve is driviing the bus.


It's not a matter of trusting any damn thing.  Nor is it possible to know what truly lies in anyones heart.

However, I operate on a "trust but verify" MO for all people: listen to the words, and then watch and see if the actions match the words.

So far, her words upon resignation seems to match pretty closely what she said she would do.

I'm particularly jaded when it comes to politicians as well, but at the end of the day, unless you wish to overthrow our elected government, politicians are what we elect.  Occasionally we get a statesman, but to expect one is really naive.

I'll settle for someone who stated intentions fairly matches their actions.

So far, neither you nor brainiacsub have shown a disconnect between her resignation reasons, and her actions after her resignations.

Firm




slvemike4u -> RE: Tea Party target Stupak won't seek re-election (4/9/2010 10:59:40 PM)

Firm lest there be any misunderstanding between us concerning that last post....brainiac is indeed right,there is a world of difference between you and Sanity.Though we disagree on much I generally respect you and the way you present your opinions and beliefs.I was just seeking to draw a comparison between the levels of examination a given thing is put thru before one chooses to accept or deny that thing.
I happen not to trust nor like Miss Palin...so lets be honest I am not too likely to take her at her word.I guess we all bring our own stuff to the table.




brainiacsub -> RE: Tea Party target Stupak won't seek re-election (4/9/2010 11:03:42 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

[...]
So far, neither you nor brainiacsub have shown a disconnect between her resignation reasons, and her actions after her resignations.

Firm


Firm, I can't speak for Mike, but the problem I have with her is I don't believe her stated reasons. She suffers from deplorable character flaws (the same suffered by many politicians) in addition to an obvious lack of formal education and intelllect which makes her incapable of seeing how woefully unqualified she is for national office.

I see her as a tragic Shakespearean character who has all the ambition but not the ability to succeed.

edited to add that I like you, too




slvemike4u -> RE: Tea Party target Stupak won't seek re-election (4/9/2010 11:14:08 PM)

Shit,if you are going to continue to express my thoughts better than I can.....feel free to speak for me anytime...I could not have said it any better....the best I come up with is...."she's a train wreck" [:D]




brainiacsub -> RE: Tea Party target Stupak won't seek re-election (4/9/2010 11:20:15 PM)

These last few posts have been rather creepy.

Or maybe it's just that great minds think alike ;)




LadyEllen -> RE: Tea Party target Stupak won't seek re-election (4/9/2010 11:22:42 PM)

Hey Brainiac - you can stop that right now! He's mine (or he's me, I'm not sure).

E




FirmhandKY -> RE: Tea Party target Stupak won't seek re-election (4/9/2010 11:23:16 PM)

Maybe you guys should consider a sub/sub pairing? [:)]

Firm

edited to add:

I like both of you as well.

btw ... what's up with the new "in your face" avatar, brainiac?






brainiacsub -> RE: Tea Party target Stupak won't seek re-election (4/9/2010 11:26:28 PM)

But he's smart...I can only beat stupid men.




slvemike4u -> RE: Tea Party target Stupak won't seek re-election (4/9/2010 11:27:36 PM)

Okay brainiac I'll let you handle that one all by your lonesome
Lady E,sweetie,she means nothing to me...just a passing fad snookums,honest .




LadyEllen -> RE: Tea Party target Stupak won't seek re-election (4/9/2010 11:32:26 PM)

Yeah, well. You can take the couch tonight.

E




brainiacsub -> RE: Tea Party target Stupak won't seek re-election (4/9/2010 11:34:47 PM)

Firm, you'll find the answer to the new boobage here:

http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=3154379




slvemike4u -> RE: Tea Party target Stupak won't seek re-election (4/9/2010 11:39:34 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: brainiacsub

But he's smart...I can only beat stupid men.
Did you by any chance notice just how stupid I was with that last post.....a truly smart man would have waited for your reply before sweet talking Lady E,who after all is way on the other side of the pond [8|]
So now will you beat me?




slvemike4u -> RE: Tea Party target Stupak won't seek re-election (4/9/2010 11:41:22 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyEllen

Yeah, well. You can take the couch tonight.

E
There is an old saying....."when in a hole....stop digging(or put down the shovel...either way)
I'm done digging for the night.[:D]




LadyEllen -> RE: Tea Party target Stupak won't seek re-election (4/9/2010 11:41:50 PM)

a twue sadist would say "no" of course. Which sorta puts you in a double bind eh Brainiac?

E




brainiacsub -> RE: Tea Party target Stupak won't seek re-election (4/9/2010 11:45:10 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

quote:

ORIGINAL: brainiacsub

But he's smart...I can only beat stupid men.
Did you by any chance notice just how stupid I was with that last post.....a truly smart man would have waited for your reply before sweet talking Lady E,who after all is way on the other side of the pond [8|]
So now will you beat me?

Not a chance...but I will use my obviously superior wit and command of the written language to make you cry. It's the best I can do. Take it or leave it.




brainiacsub -> RE: Tea Party target Stupak won't seek re-election (4/9/2010 11:46:10 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyEllen

a twue sadist would say "no" of course. Which sorta puts you in a double bind eh Brainiac?

E

The problem is, I'm not a sadist. I'm every bit the pussy he is.




FirmhandKY -> RE: Tea Party target Stupak won't seek re-election (4/9/2010 11:50:46 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: brainiacsub

Firm, you'll find the answer to the new boobage here:

http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=3154379


Check your cmail.

I think I was correct in my initial appreciation.  [:)]

Firm




LadyEllen -> RE: Tea Party target Stupak won't seek re-election (4/10/2010 12:01:57 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: brainiacsub

The problem is, I'm not a sadist. I'm every bit the pussy he is.


Hey - youre well into verbal humiliation and you already offered to make Mike cry......

"Take up this crop! Strike it down with all your fury! And your journey to the dark side will be complete....!"

E




brainiacsub -> RE: Tea Party target Stupak won't seek re-election (4/10/2010 12:12:34 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyEllen

quote:

ORIGINAL: brainiacsub

The problem is, I'm not a sadist. I'm every bit the pussy he is.


Hey - youre well into verbal humiliation and you already offered to make Mike cry......

"Take up this crop! Strike it down with all your fury! And your journey to the dark side will be complete....!"

E


I will never turn to the dark side! You have failed, your Highness. I am a twue Submissive, just like my mother before me.

edited to add: we are both quoting Star Wars, on a bdsm site, at 2:00 am on a Sat morning. I think we are unloveable.




Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875