|
Real0ne -> RE: German court fines British bishop for Holocaust denial (4/17/2010 7:21:29 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: LadyEllen
Is this the level of your comprehension RO?
For the purpose of trying to establish your position, I called the genocide a hoax, which was then pinned on naziism; you then go into "prove there was a genocide" as if I had posited the exact contrary. And then you throw in something about Iraq that has no connection with the matter in hand, whether to deflect attention, a result of your misunderstanding or some sort of justification for the genocide you wish me to prove regarding the nazis (despite it being posited as a hoax) that you say never happened (contrary to all evidence). Quite why the Iraq situation - something I was against from day one incidentally - should provide justification for nazi genocide I am not sure.
You say I mischaracterise your position in my second comment - perhaps you would care to state your position so that it may be understood rather than guessed at from the disjointed and oft times bizarre hints you give?
Again on the third comment, you misunderstand my premise; for the sake of argument I have posited the genocide as a hoax that was pinned on naziism - in other words that the "supposed genocide" did not occur and therefore was nothing to do with naziism. Your response is therefore baffling in the context - basically you disagree with a premise confirming your position?
E
Well when I speak to the matter leaves little room for misinterpretation. Holohoax, one word says it all.
They way you constructed it, it could be taken either way.
Yeh Iraq did have connection to my point, and with what I understood you to say. If you claim I did not interpret what you said in the correct context then we move on from there.
Ok so then it sounds like we are in agreement.
|
|
|
|
