|
Termyn8or -> RE: Common Law and rights (4/23/2010 10:08:29 AM)
|
Come on now Air, WTF did he do to you ? I agree this is getting old but if I get really tired of it I will just not click on it. He is not standing at my front door screaming into a bullhorn, I have to take action to read this ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ummm outdated overreaching ummmmmmmm, I don't know what to call it.
At the moment I am checking to see if my question has been answered. It is also my contention that the ens legis type of argument has been proven not to work. I also contend that on it's face it just about can't, and refusing process service on that basis will usually result in the "person" to be adjudicated against in absentia. This has happened to a couple of friends of mine, but in those cases, process was deliberately misdirected by the opponent and still there is very little that can be done about it after the fact. And if you actually go to court they will laugh when you try to use such a defense. In fact if I were a judge and someone tried this shit, I would just call for a typist to reproduce the documents with properly cased letters of the named defendent.
What's more, a full name fully spelled out with proper capitalisation is referred to as a true Christian appelation. This government is not Christian in any sense. That is why the Constitution does not refer to God or YHWH or Jesus or Mohammed or anything else. The word Creator was used and it was used for a specific reason, the whole idea of this country was not to impose religion of any kind. Well not the whole idea but you know what I mean.
Perhaps I am just here to determine the mass per volume of some posters, which as you may know is density, or is that specific gravity ? Maybe I come to get confused ? Maybe I am here to try to keep somebody's ass out of the sling, because I know WTF I am talking about. All the detail aside, what will be the results ? This all caps shit was out the window over ten years ago because it just doesn't work. I have seen people skate on quite a few things, and win, and do it with style even. But this ens legis shit has never worked to my knowledge, not once for anyone I have ever known who got into this.
I have already stated that there is only ONE strategy that works and I see no reason to repeat it now. I still await the answer to my question also. If I ever get that answer and it is found that it is advantageous in this case, I will be fully supportive and will advise to the best of my ability. But my best advice right now is to assess whether or not there is any advantage, thus I await an answer. Engaging in details would simply be encouragement to possibly do something stupid. If I'd have gone with it when they urged me to, I would not be in the position I am today.
People would be surprised at how much information a cop on patrol can get on someone with a few keystrokes. There is probably a flag raised when people try this in court, or anywhere. At that point the first thing that is going to go through the cops head is : "Oh, one of them guys". Maybe I am a nut, but I can't see any advantage in that at all. Maybe I am just stupid.
T
|
|
|
|
