leadership527
Posts: 5026
Joined: 6/2/2008 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: VaguelyCurious I have a lot of respect for you and your dynamic, Jeff-it just mystifies me why people such as yourself, who are in satisfying and happy relationships, need to go around saying that others who exhibit traits x.y,z are 'not dominant'. I said it, specifically, because it was a key part of the question being asked. Had the OP left it at the first sentence, my answer would've been different. I call your attention to the specific statements "in my mind" and "by any definition I could come up with". Honestly, I think I'm entitled to my opinions and to express them here. That being said, you caused me to think carefully about why I think that way. And I do think the error is mine. When I think of D/s, I think of it in terms of social dominance and social submission. In that context, the statement makes no sense... you are either dominant or not relative to the other party. To say "topping from the bottom" is just another way to say, "I'm not in the dominant position." However, social D/s is not the baseline context for a BDSM site which is largely focused on sexual dominance and submission. In that context, the statement makes a lot more sense. There is an agreement between two parties to occupy specific roles (which may or may not align with their social D/s roles) and it's not unreasonable to call foul when the person who's agreed to occupy the submissive role (and before anyone gets their feathers in bunch, I don't mean that in the sense of "fake") fails to do so. I stand corrected and I won't make that mistake again.
_____________________________
~Jeff I didn't so much "enslave" Carol as I did "enlove" her. - Me I want a joyous, loving, respectful relationship where the male is in charge and deserves to be. - DavanKael
|