Aneirin
Posts: 6121
Joined: 3/18/2006 From: Tamaris Status: offline
|
The facilities in a town are bought and paid for by the tax payer, so in effect the tax payer owns them, but they also pay an authority to maintain the facilities. If no taxes were paid, there would be no facilities and there no need for a council, so if we want facilities, we have to have a council and it's work force to work on behalf of us. But what councils have to realise, is they do not own the facilities, they are only there to look after them. So, if a cycle is legally parked and secured on the facilities the council is paid to maintain, they cannot remove that cycle without first informing the owner that it is required that the cycle be removed, this with most reputable councils is done by posting a bill nearby to inform the public of upcoming works and in some cases publicity via other means, newspapers and radio. A council cannot simply remove a cycle which is legally parked and secured, it has no right to. If in the case it has been noted that the cycle has been there for a long time and is decaying enough to show it is not in regular use, they still cannot remove the cycle without first seeking the ownership, as there are people who live in the centre of towns and have cycles, it is upto them when they use them. In the case of a cycle secured to a pedestrian safety barrier in need of repair or even because it is there and may provide an obstruction to pedestrians, it by the nature of it being a pedestrian barrier, is not a legal cycle securing and so can be removed, as it is the cycle is illegally secured..
_____________________________
Everything we are is the result of what we have thought, the mind is everything, what we think, we become - Guatama Buddha Conservatism is distrust of people tempered by fear - William Gladstone
|