Silence8
Posts: 833
Joined: 11/2/2009 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: tazzygirl quote:
ORIGINAL: Silence8 quote:
ORIGINAL: LadyEllen What is and is not considered moral varies from time to time as well as place to place, and feeds into the law which thereby changes from time to time and place to place to reflect its environment and the needs perceived of those determining it. E I'm not arguing necessarily for sending all black Americans some check in the mail -- though it wouldn't be all that hard, and it would be a GREAT economic stimulus, because a lot of that money would be spent immediately out of need, and the multiplier effect would make economists do a little dance. Wait, why I am not arguing that? Errr.... um... I've lost my train of thought. What was amazing about the NYT article, in my everlasting study of ideology, is that, while ideology is usually a false question, the NYT contains both a false question and a false answer!!!!!!!!! Okay, let's delineate. The false question: Are reparations justified? The false answer: No, because Africans also enslaved people. Then there's Tazzy's false answer B: No, because slavery was legal. The real question motivating the false one: is economic inequality along the lines of race a result of historical inequality? The real answer: Most definitely yes. The real solution: more tax cuts to or credit initiatives for the economically disadvantaged, a real enforcement of white-collar crime, equalizing sentences, defunding the prison industry, no more bailouts to rich bankers, no more socialism for the rich, less an emphasis on patronizing sadomasochistic charity practices that are ultimately tax-deductible and a cover for organized crime, etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. You cannot penalize someone today for doing what is legal until tomorrow. Now, if this was still the 60's, i would whole heartedly agree that there is a disparity among the races. As much as you may wish to argue there is no even playing field... and there isnt one unless you can afford one, which many white people cannot anymore, let alone blacks, hispanics, ect ect ect... its as even as its going to get. Money levels any playing field. Its the only color that matters. Some get lucky achieving that "race", others work hard to do so. Its there, available to any who desire it and work hard enough to achieve it. If someone doesnt, they only have themselves to blame. Now, if you feel so in need to pay someone for the guilt you feel in the slavery issue, tell me, how would you go about paying them? How much? for how long? Would is stop with this race? Who else would you owe? See, i feel no guilt over the slavery issue. I have none to feel. I never owned a slave, neither did any in my family tree. This guilt trip doesnt work. But, since you feel so guilty by the association of slavery in the US, cmail me on the other side and i will send you my address for you to send me a check as well. 1) That legality argument is by the wayside. My Nazi example stands. Morality trumps legality, at least in extreme circumstances. I believe in the spirit of the law; I suspect the letter of the law usually equates with some obscenity. (Any S/M participant should understand this last point!) 2) 'It's as even as it's going to get'..? Kind of silly, since American economic inequality is perhaps more unequal than ever before, at least more unequal than it was during most of the 20th century, also, notably, more unequal than it was during times of actual prosperity. There's a TON of good work to be done; any answer to the reparations debate doesn't change that. 3) The fact of the matter is that a large portion of the population is a leech on actual progress, and its 'successes' have nothing to do with hard work. Also, a lot of hard work, due to systemic flaws, actually produces negative value, of which the financial industry is just an exaggerated example. If you really want to get serious about this issue, we can easily observe that occupations that most consistently produce positive value (like waste management, for instance) consistently are monetarily valued the lowest. The implication is severe and hard for most people to swallow -- the system is, in many senses, exactly the opposite of how it should be. The most consistent way to make it big is through predation.
|