Termyn8or
Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005 Status: offline
|
Using FR The relation to the value of the currency is true, but everything is relative. A change in the value of a ollar will be reflected in the dollar cost of everything, proportional to it's price. Wind, geothermal as well as using the tides of the oceans should be considered. All of them are quite powerful. And I'm not whispering here - About three years ago a new form of windmill was invented. This thing is like a squirrel cage blower, like in a funace. It will pick up energy very efficiently from any direction. Now that I mention it I wonder who canned that design, because I clearly remember reading about it as well as pictures of successfully operating prototypes. The plan was to use them on top of large buildings. It can probably be found again, but it probably should have been front page news. ""The cost of any alternative fuel will be exactly equal to the fuel it replaces"" That is true, because that is known as the break even point. It will not replace what we have now until it can compete with what people are paying now. Obviously they do not want to pay more. But in time ........ All in all it is good news, but like anything is not the philosopher's stone. The main problem is that wind cannot be counted on as a constant energy supply. People need a constant source. Therefore of course there is research all the time on new battery technology, none of which is very green. Most rechargable batteries are hell on the environment at the end of their life cycle. What other way to store this energy is feasible ? Well there is one, not really cheap but should be low mainainence and I don't think it has really been explored much. It's kinetic energy so store it kinetically. Daft you say ? Think about it. Let's try to be as green as possible, just pump water up into a big tank, and I mean a BIG tank. In warmer temperate regions it could just be water. In coastal regions it could concievably be seawater, but in any other region there would have to be two tanks. One above ground and one below. In colder climates it would probably need additives to prevent freezing. Only in tropical and warm temperate coastal regions could it be done with one tank. But I am not talking about generating electricity and using electric pumps, I mean use the kinetic energy directly through sort of a transmission, which would divert the unspent energy to the mechanical pumps. The output of the system in turn drives the generators. The wind dies down and the valve opens. That simple. Now don't poo poo the idea just because it would have moving parts, first of all if they can build a deisel engine that ran for 100 years, they can do this, especially with modern advances. Well except the human brain. But with modern materials, sealed bearings, if seawater the use of phosphor bronze or whatever may have replaced it. Build it right the first time I see no reason that it shouldn't run for 100 years. You are not poisoning any lubricants with the byproducts of burning fossil fuel. You wouldn't need piston rings, so all you really need is some really durable material for the impellors. Sealed roller bearings, with the proper materials chosen for the seals. (my Mother was an expert in that field) It CAN be done in my considered opinion. Now everyone tell me why it can't. No, really. If there is a reason that such a system could not work I want to know. T
|