HandSolo
Posts: 323
Joined: 11/22/2007 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Guilty1974 quote:
ORIGINAL: Blackcords And the matter of tight bonds. It is quite possible for someone to be bound tightly, so that they cannot untie themselves, without any possibility of nerve damage, circulatory issues or burns. The choice of rope, knot and placement determines the effect. Actually, I can imagine one or two bondage positions in which this might be possible between highly experienced rope partners who know eachother and their specific bodies very, very well. But for most advanced bondage positions between people who have a moderate experience and haven't been tying together for a year or two or so (--> so that's for just about all practical purposes) it cannot, at least not without any possibility of nerve damage (circulation issues are hardly dangerous, and neither are rope burns, so I'll gran you those two). You can try to do it as safe as possible, but it's quite unlikely it actually gets to be safe. Which is why rope bondage is an excellent example of a RACK activity. When suspension comes into rope play, I don't see any option that would qualify as "safe" alltogether. I agree (of course). If everything goes perfect in an ideal world, restrictive bondage is "safe." In the real world, everybody does everything right, the bottom squirms, a rope sfifts, and somebody's limb goes numb or worse. Rope burn could potentially be very risky, assuming one counts getting fired, divorced, disowned or excommunicated as a risk. ;)
_____________________________
I plan on leaving this world the way I came in: naked, screaming and by accident.
|