TheHeretic
Posts: 19100
Joined: 3/25/2007 From: California, USA Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: ThatDamnedPanda quote:
ORIGINAL: TheHeretic There are people here much better at math than me. Anybody got what the death rate for census enumerators would be with six traffic fatalities in a week? (I guess it doesn't say anywhere in the training manuals that stop signs in Texas are red octagons with white lettering, and they mean "that bigass truck has the right of way, Stupid!") You've got to be kidding. You're saying that the fact that 6 people who work for the census were killed in traffic accidents, and some of them ran a stop sign, is somehow a sign that the Census operation is a fuck-up? You can't possibly be serious. And if that's not what you're saying, why even bring it up? What's the point? People get killed in car accidents no matter who they're working for. I distinctly remember people getting killed running stop signs when Bush was in office too, that incompetent bastard. I brought it up, Panda, because it was the news story I linked to at the start of the thread. I'd like to see the wider picture, too. Total accidents. Now shit is going to happen, because we live in a universe where shit happens, but how are those numbers going to stack up in comparison to, let's say, pizza delivery drivers? I'm sure working the census is safer than Alaskan crab fishing, but six in a week? I don't think we are losing cops or firefighters at that kind of rate (maybe in 2001). I'm quite certain the rules require a license and insurance check. How often was there an "issue" with actually meeting the requirement? What other parts of the plan aren't going work? How do they handle it when things go wrong? Accountability is pretty simple. Apply a generous strip of "shit happens," and for anything south of there, the buck stops with Barack. He's the CEO. If we have systemic failures, widespread fraud, a rash of fatalities, God knows how many lawsuits, if it is bad enough, it's his. And the inverse, if it gets done quick, right, and under budget. Whether he picked somebody for the job and let them go at it, or needed regular briefings, it's a Constitutional mandate on his plate. Shall we draw a line at structural failures on a multi-regional level? Bonus points for a suburban pedestrian killed by a drunk/high driver with a census sign in the car. My hunch is that a lot of important early decisions were made ideologically. How much of the Chicago Way played a role in the hiring of district staff and directors? How many social theorists weighted the hiring process, and wrote the test? Any "additional goals" in the hiring practices and recruiting? I'm easy here. Shit happens. My expectations are low. Don't fuck it up too badly, and this administration can buy some slack from me. Hell, it's a chance for them to impress me with how skillfully they can make government work seamlessly and efficiently to better serve us all. It is their chance to bring me back from the Dark Side. I'm not packing in anticipation.
_____________________________
If you lose one sense, your other senses are enhanced. That's why people with no sense of humor have such an inflated sense of self-importance.
|