RE: Back from Iraq for a short time, ready to answer your questions if you have any... (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


pahunkboy -> RE: Back from Iraq for a short time, ready to answer your questions if you have any... (5/11/2010 6:22:38 PM)

"No, I'm not calling you guys traitors... had to say that to prevent your kind from putting words into my mouth. Nope, people like you are useful idiots to the enemy." -herfacechair/snip


in that case DO SOMETHING about the federal reserve




Angelsmile -> RE: Back from Iraq for a short time, ready to answer your questions if you have any... (5/11/2010 6:23:14 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: herfacechair

I'm here on R and R from Iraq. Ben deployed there with 1 ID. Figured I'd start a thread to answer questions you guys may have about what's going on there. [:D]


Was asking you the question what can be done to protect an American in Afghanistan and expected some really good advice from you as a veteran regarding this. But what I got here was rather unprofessional. Honestly I don't believe that you have been in Iraq but that you just wrote this to make yourself look important and get some attention.
I got the advice I had been seeking to help the American in question now from a German veteran and forwarded it the the American who will be sent there. As well as the result of the report of another German veteran who has been there. 

I am very angry and appalled to see that you (your profile says you are American) think that all this is very funny and how much you really don't care and how you give a shit on a compatriot's and comrade's life I am doing all efforts to safe somehow here. It's a shame.




pahunkboy -> RE: Back from Iraq for a short time, ready to answer your questions if you have any... (5/11/2010 6:25:07 PM)

We protect the opium crops. 




herfacechair -> RE: Back from Iraq for a short time, ready to answer your questions if you have any... (5/11/2010 6:25:09 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: ShoreBound149

quote:

ORIGINAL: herfacechair

quote:

ORIGINAL: ShoreBound149

quote:

ORIGINAL: herfacechair

quote:

ORIGINAL: ShoreBound149

Back from the beach......fucking windy........just like here


No, that's just your head echoing against the walls.

I don't get it


Of course you don't get it, thanks for proving my point.


 
Ya know the world ain't fair when it's ThisGuy  who gets whacked by friendly fire


The world's not fair when one considers the possibilities that could've happened had something different occurred the night certain posters got conceived... for instance, had their parents opted for oral instead.




herfacechair -> RE: Back from Iraq for a short time, ready to answer your questions if you have any... (5/11/2010 6:30:20 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

quote:

From MSNBC: "Bomb Said to hold deadly sarin gas explodes in Iraq"

"The Iraqi Survey Group confirmed today that a 155-millimeter artillery round containing sarin nerve agent had been found," said Kimmitt, the chief military spokesman in Iraq. "The round had been rigged as an IED [improvised explosive device] which was discovered by a U.S. force convoy.


Were the Iraqi Survey Group, and Kimmitt, lying and telling half truths in that MSNBC article? YES [ ] NO [ ]

I don't want your bullshit, just make your selection. If you chose, "YES," then you're guilty of what you're accusing me of doing. If you chose "NO," then your assumptions, that I'm "pretending" or "acting" like I know what I'm talking about are FALSE.

If the facts are on your side, you'd be able to answer it per instructions, and you'd be able to answer it without looking stupid. If you feel the need to try to baffle me with bullshit, to avoid what I'm requiring you to do, then obviously you've got no confidence in your statement that I'm, "trying to "make" people believe that I know what I'm talking about."

Your failure to answer the above given the restrictions, on the bullshit, that I give you will prove that I DO know what I'm talking about. And, it'll prove another thing true:

"Their contribution to political debate is worthless, since even they do not believe things they say." - Ann Coulter


Actually you are the one both lying and telling half truths.
The full facts about the above have already been exposed and you have been exposed as a liar why you continue to deny is a tribute to your lack of both integrity and your inability to "man up" when you have been found in a lie.


YOU FAILED TO ANSWER MY QUESTION!

One, every attempt to prove that wrong failed, they VERIFIED the facts contained in the above quote. Your SELECTIVE quoting, coupled with your ignoring when I came out and proved that those "full facts" actually supported my position, demonstrates your lack of integrity. The only person that's lying here is you.

So how about answering that question per the instructions that I gave you above? Your moves to exclude everything I say in relation to that question speaks volumes about your lack of integrity.

You need to answer that question, or man up to the fact that you're a gutless liar.





domiguy -> RE: Back from Iraq for a short time, ready to answer your questions if you have any... (5/11/2010 6:36:03 PM)

What a fucking waste of space you are. On leave and there is not a single person, including everyone on CM, that wants to spend any time with you.

No one gives a shit about you.




herfacechair -> RE: Back from Iraq for a short time, ready to answer your questions if you have any... (5/11/2010 6:36:25 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: subtee


quote:

ORIGINAL: ShoreBound149

Ya know the world ain't fair when it's ThisGuy  who gets whacked by friendly fire


That was disgusting and a national shame from killing him to trying to cover it up.


This is how I interpret his post:

"It's not fair that this guy get's whacked by friendly fire, instead of herfacechair."




VideoAdminZeta -> RE: Back from Iraq for a short time, ready to answer your questions if you have any... (5/11/2010 6:37:45 PM)

Calm down, keyboard warriors.  You need to be one with the keys.




herfacechair -> RE: Back from Iraq for a short time, ready to answer your questions if you have any... (5/11/2010 6:38:23 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

quote:

When you use a double negative in english it reverses the meaning of your statement that is why it is gramatically incorrect. Your little freudian slip is noted.

First things first, let's look at what's grammatically correct and what isn't.

"English" is spelled with a capital "E."

"Freudian" is spelled with a capital "F."

There should be a comma after "English," and a period should follow "statement."

Now, let's look at three ways you could make your sentence, "grammatically correct."

"When you use a double negative in English, it reverses the meaning of your statement. That's why it's grammatically incorrect."

"When you use double negatives in English, they reverse your statement's meaning. That's why it's grammatically incorrect."

"When you use a double negative in English, it reverses the meaning of your statement; that's why it's grammatically incorrect."

Those examples aren't perfect, but they're definitely better than your grammatically incorrect statement. When you correct someone's grammar, do so with a grammatically correct sentence.


Which of the points of grammar that you cite change the meaning of my statement.
Your's does mine do not.
Once again you choose not to answer direct questions and set up a false arguement about trivia.
Perhaps that works for you but it does impair your credibility.
You start a thread in which you state you will answer questions then you launch into twenty some pages of usa usa usa usa usa....
do try to have a nice day.


Anybody with any fraction of intelligence would've understood what I was getting at, despite your complaints of the grammar involved. So you don't have a point. Your attacking grammar just shows your desperation. My point still stands. If you're going to go that route, make sure that you're perfect. Or have the integrity to admit that you don't have an argument, and have the integrity to do the right thing.

I'll answer questions having to do with Iraq, not having to do with arguments that you're having with another poster, or arguments that I'm not a part of.

Every day I get the opportunity to destroy your arguments is a day I consider a "nice" day.




thompsonx -> RE: Back from Iraq for a short time, ready to answer your questions if you have any... (5/11/2010 6:43:47 PM)

quote:

Every day I get the opportunity to destroy your arguments is a day I consider a "nice" day.


It is clear that you have not had a nice day since the 5th of this month...well perhaps when you get back "in country" things will get better.




mikeyOfGeorgia -> RE: Back from Iraq for a short time, ready to answer your questions if you have any... (5/11/2010 6:46:54 PM)

quote:

"in country"???


haven't you heard: "America SUCKS"




thompsonx -> RE: Back from Iraq for a short time, ready to answer your questions if you have any... (5/11/2010 6:59:30 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: herfacechair

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

quote:

Racer Jim was right on the money with his assessment. The majority of the Vietnam Veterans weren't the only ones that didn't take Kerry's service seriously... as applied to the 2004 Elections. The majority of those that were in the military felt the same way.


Above in post 175 you decide to include John Kerry in this discussion.

Below you refuse to discuss the very thing after I pointed out that ace mccain commited treason by confessing to be a war criminal and giving intrviews to communist journalist.
You castigate kerry but when it is pointed out that someone of a different political stripe is also guilty of treason you come up with this

quote:

I'm going to answer things that have to do with the debate, and I'm going to skip over things that have nothing to do with the debate, or with your attempts to change the subject. I'm sorry, but your question about John McCain's actions in Vietnam has absolutely nothing to do with Iraq, and my answering questions about Iraq.


This is what I was refering to.
You do not want to do anything except pimp your own agenda.


I've tried to explain a simple concept to you, and you're simply not getting it. So I'm going to have to break this down for you.

WHERE, in MY posts, do I accuse John Kerry of being a TRAITOR?

WHERE, in MY posts, do I accuse John Kerry of committing TREASON?


You accuse john kerry of committing treason and being a trator when you said:
Racer Jim was right on the money with his assessment.

Notice the period at the end of the sentence? If you meant to attach the following sentence it would have been a comma or a word like because or since.






thompsonx -> RE: Back from Iraq for a short time, ready to answer your questions if you have any... (5/11/2010 7:02:40 PM)

quote:

The world's not fair when one considers the possibilities that could've happened had something different occurred the night certain posters got conceived... for instance, had their parents opted for oral instead.


True but then you would not be able to post your charming little stories.




Dubbelganger -> RE: Back from Iraq for a short time, ready to answer your questions if you have any... (5/11/2010 7:07:24 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: VideoAdminZeta

Calm down, keyboard warriors.  You need to be one with the keys.


Aum I am one with the keys........
Aum I am one with the keys........
Aum I am one with the keys........

Wow! It's working!




herfacechair -> RE: Back from Iraq for a short time, ready to answer your questions if you have any... (5/11/2010 7:31:38 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Angelsmile

quote:

ORIGINAL: herfacechair

I'm here on R and R from Iraq. Ben deployed there with 1 ID. Figured I'd start a thread to answer questions you guys may have about what's going on there. [:D]


Was asking you the question what can be done to protect an American in Afghanistan and expected some really good advice from you as a veteran regarding this. But what I got here was rather unprofessional. Honestly I don't believe that you have been in Iraq but that you just wrote this to make yourself look important and get some attention.
I got the advice I had been seeking to help the American in question now from a German veteran and forwarded it the the American who will be sent there. As well as the result of the report of another German veteran who has been there.

I am very angry and appalled to see that you (your profile says you are American) think that all this is very funny and how much you really don't care and how you give a shit on a compatriot's and comrade's life I am doing all efforts to safe somehow here. It's a shame.


I'm calling you out on several levels.

Aylee is an Army veteran; I'm currently on active duty. We both gave you sound advice. You dismissed both our posts, even accused us of not giving you anything helpful. I've offered, on numerous occasions on this thread, to prove my service... to include showing a neutral party my DA 31, ERB, and other documents proving that I am who I say I am.

That's my first challenge to you by the way.

Instead of accepting the challenge, you go on and accuse me of not being who I say I am. So, having said that, here's my second challenge:


PM me the name of your soldier, the full first, middle, and last name. Once you do that, I'll go onto AKO and see if he actually exists.

I won't use his name for purposes outside of verifying your claims.

You got your advice from a German veteran? Serious? You see, this is another story why your claims raise red flags.

Again, your soldier would've done a train up to deploy to Afghanistan. Once your soldier gets to Kuwait, he'll do additional train up. His unit should already given him the training, and CIF/RFI issue to reduce risks to his safety in the combat zone. He would not need to get advice from a "German veteran." When he's got access to his unit's training program, and soldiers in his platoon who've previously deployed.

You were entitled to the responses that you got, not just from Aylee and me, but from other posters here. Your comments were unprofessional, and reeked foul play. I gave you the benefit of the doubt, if anything to show the readers that I am in the military. The fact that you could look at my long response, which is useful advice, yet claim that I'm a "poser," speaks volumes about your integrity.

Oh, and get this:


"your profile says you are American" -Angelsmile

My profile has "JC/Ogden/Manhatta, Kansas" on it. Yes, those are in the United States, but that doesn't mean that you looked at my profile. When I look at the "Who's Viewing Me" page, I don't see your name anywhere!

You know what that means? It means that you're lying to the readers just so that you could make a feeble attempt to attack my credibility. I doubt that you are who you claim you are, and that you have a soldier about to go to Afghanistan. Please create a story that's "more believable" next time.




herfacechair -> RE: Back from Iraq for a short time, ready to answer your questions if you have any... (5/11/2010 7:34:17 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: domiguy

What a fucking waste of space you are. On leave and there is not a single person, including everyone on CM, that wants to spend any time with you.

No one gives a shit about you.


I don't recall seeing you at my current location. So you don't have a leg to stand on when claiming who wants to spend time with me or who doesn't. Apparently, you and everybody else arguing with me want to spend time with me. The opposing side of the argument is proving you wrong.




herfacechair -> RE: Back from Iraq for a short time, ready to answer your questions if you have any... (5/11/2010 7:35:37 PM)

quote:



quote:

Every day I get the opportunity to destroy your arguments is a day I consider a "nice" day.


It is clear that you have not had a nice day since the 5th of this month...well perhaps when you get back "in country" things will get better.


WRONG. I've had a blast since then. Your denial of the fact that your arguments are getting destroyed doesn't change that fact. Of course things will get better when I get back there. Because I'll continue destroying your arguments. You do realize that I've managed to get into online debates WHILE AT IRAQ, do you?

Gotta love the Internet. [:D]




herfacechair -> RE: Back from Iraq for a short time, ready to answer your questions if you have any... (5/11/2010 7:38:40 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


quote:

ORIGINAL: herfacechair

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

quote:

Racer Jim was right on the money with his assessment. The majority of the Vietnam Veterans weren't the only ones that didn't take Kerry's service seriously... as applied to the 2004 Elections. The majority of those that were in the military felt the same way.


Above in post 175 you decide to include John Kerry in this discussion.

Below you refuse to discuss the very thing after I pointed out that ace mccain commited treason by confessing to be a war criminal and giving intrviews to communist journalist.
You castigate kerry but when it is pointed out that someone of a different political stripe is also guilty of treason you come up with this

quote:

I'm going to answer things that have to do with the debate, and I'm going to skip over things that have nothing to do with the debate, or with your attempts to change the subject. I'm sorry, but your question about John McCain's actions in Vietnam has absolutely nothing to do with Iraq, and my answering questions about Iraq.


This is what I was refering to.
You do not want to do anything except pimp your own agenda.


I've tried to explain a simple concept to you, and you're simply not getting it. So I'm going to have to break this down for you.

WHERE, in MY posts, do I accuse John Kerry of being a TRAITOR?

WHERE, in MY posts, do I accuse John Kerry of committing TREASON?


You accuse john kerry of committing treason and being a trator when you said:
Racer Jim was right on the money with his assessment.

Notice the period at the end of the sentence? If you meant to attach the following sentence it would have been a comma or a word like because or since.



What I actually said:

"Racer Jim was right on the money with his assessment. The majority of the Vietnam Veterans weren't the only ones that didn't take Kerry's service seriously... as applied to the 2004 Elections. The majority of those that were in the military felt the same way." -herfacechair

Question: Which one of his assessments was I saying he was on the money with?

Answer: That the majority of the Vietnam Veterans weren't the only ones that didn't take Kerry's service seriously... as applied to the 2004 Elections.

You're WRONG when arguing that I should've used a comma, or a word like "because" or "since." That would represent redundancy. A period is perfect for my intentions. And given it's location to the sentence that follows it, I've communicated what I intended to communicate.

Quit trying to pull straws just so that you could stay in the fight. You DIDN'T Answer my questions. Go back and give me a quote where I actually SAY that he was a "traitor" or that he committed "treason."




domiguy -> RE: Back from Iraq for a short time, ready to answer your questions if you have any... (5/11/2010 7:39:29 PM)

WRONG...

You keep forgetting that you have never been out of mother's basement.




stef -> RE: Back from Iraq for a short time, ready to answer your questions if you have any... (5/11/2010 7:40:36 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: mikeyOfGeorgia

not that it's any of your business, but my job is taking care of my handicapped gf. It's a 24/7 job and not something to snoot your nose up at. When you can say the same, then come back and speak to me. right now, you don't have a leg to stand on. So, in the mean time...stop speaking out of your ass, would you?

Oh, so you're living off HER aid.  Yes, that's much better.  What a stand-up guy you are Mike, the world needs more moochers like you.  Thank heavens you live in a "third world" country where that's possible.

~stef




Page: <<   < prev  23 24 [25] 26 27   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
5.078125E-02