RE: Back from Iraq for a short time, ready to answer your questions if you have any... (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message

domiguy -> RE: Back from Iraq for a short time, ready to answer your questions if you have any... (7/7/2010 8:29:22 PM)

I never saw their break up coming. Katy Would drink a sixer of blatz and then ride termy's fingers in hopes of removing some of the filth under his nails.



domiguy -> RE: Back from Iraq for a short time, ready to answer your questions if you have any... (7/7/2010 8:30:54 PM)

Users viewing this topic: willbeurdaddy,


Hey look!!! wilbur is reading this thread....I hope he comes and joins us!!!

he is always such an inspiration for the kids.



KatyLied -> RE: Back from Iraq for a short time, ready to answer your questions if you have any... (7/7/2010 8:32:28 PM)

good nite, I just noticed domi's subnic "internet dick", when did you get dubbed?  was it during the great 2010 revival?



marie2 -> RE: Back from Iraq for a short time, ready to answer your questions if you have any... (7/7/2010 8:33:44 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: domiguy

I never saw their break up coming. Katy Would drink a sixer of blatz and then ride termy's fingers in hopes of removing some of the filth under his nails.



His nails came out even dirtier.



domiguy -> RE: Back from Iraq for a short time, ready to answer your questions if you have any... (7/7/2010 8:34:54 PM)

And they stunk!!!!

internet prick!!!



vincentML -> RE: Back from Iraq for a short time, ready to answer your questions if you have any... (7/8/2010 6:58:41 AM)


quote:

The United Nations was created to address symmetrical warfare, NOT asymmetrical warfare. The United Nations had no laws that addressed asymmetrical warfare. Our removing Saddam Hussein was an act of asymmetrical warfare. Since the United Nations didn't have any rules covering asymmetrical warfare, there were no rules for us to break; HENCE, we didn't commit an outlaw act.


In fact, the UN was very active vis a vis Iraq before our invasion. It had approved the no fly zones and the economic sanctions. It had approved our rebuff of Iraq's invasion of Kuwait. So your assertion that the UN was not set up to deal with this situation is nonsense.

The only things asymmetric about our invasion of Iraq were the lies told to drive the nation into a frenzy for war. Article 51 very clearly establishes the law for war between sovereign nations. Yours is a newly created definition of the UN and it is in your mind only. If it were true that the UN had no rules for this misadventure why did Colin Powell argue the case for war before the Security Council? Obviously, we conceded the UN had jurisdiction but then went around them to construct a fictional "coalition of the willing." Hence, we were Outlaw. Our removal of Saddam was an unprovoked interference into the affairs of a sovereign nation.

"Asymmetric warfare is war between belligerents whose relative military power differs significantly, or whose strategy or tactics differ significantly." If the Outlaw Bush/Cheney/Rummy/Wolfie anticipated (wrongly it turns out) that Iraq possessed and was prepared to use nuclear, chemical. and biological weapons against our troops this war hardly qualifies as asymmetric.

quote:

You DON'T speak for the fallen coalition soldiers in this war. The vast majority of those soldiers died for a cause that they believed in. If you want to get an idea of what they believed in, it's close to what I've argued here. I've thoroughly justified the need for us to fight this battle... one that's a mortal fight where only one option would prevail. There's no "claimed" about my authority on the subject compared to that of the people that I'm arguing against.


In our Democracy it is the citizens of the nation who make choices of War and its value, not the soldiers who fight it. The Chain of Command begins at the ballot box and carries on through Public Opinion. Public opinion does not support our misadventure in Iraq.

quote:

It's FACT. My first hand observations makes me more qualified to speak about the subject than you, or anybody else that's debating against me on this thread.


Your first hand observations merely blind you to seeing the forest for the trees. As a soldier you are subject to the will of the American people and the Iraq war does not have our supporrt. Your in country observations count for nothing except pumping up your own ego.

quote:

You lied about my "not" responding to your post, played a deceitful game with regards to your lies about my "not" responding to you, yet here you are telling people to "not" do what you're accusing me of doing? Not only are a liar who also lacks integrity, you're also a hypocrite.


I am still awaiting your response to my posting of passages from the 9-11 Commission Report which debunk your assertion that Iraq had connections to Al Quiada, that these training facilities were identified in the Report, and that we had justification of any sort to go to war. As Powell testified, Wolfie was hard pressed to justify the invasion. If you answered me please point me to it.

Bush/Cheney/Rummy/Wolfie committed a criminal act that caused the lives of coalition soldiers, an even greater number of lives of innocent Iraqui civilians, and the dislocation of millions of Iraquis into Jordan and Syria.

Iraq posed no imminent threat to the United States. Iraq posed no threat whatsoever to the United States. Your attempt to rewrite that history and cover up the tragic misadventure is disgusting.



thompsonx -> RE: Back from Iraq for a short time, ready to answer your questions if you have any... (7/8/2010 10:04:16 AM)

quote:

Zero multiplied by any amount is still zero.


This is a pretty apt self analysis, concerning the volumninous posts, you have made.



thompsonx -> RE: Back from Iraq for a short time, ready to answer your questions if you have any... (7/8/2010 10:25:53 AM)

quote:

The United Nations was created to address symmetrical warfare, NOT asymmetrical warfare. The United Nations had no laws that addressed asymmetrical warfare. Our removing Saddam Hussein was an act of asymmetrical warfare. Since the United Nations didn't have any rules covering asymmetrical warfare, there were no rules for us to break; HENCE, we didn't commit an outlaw act.



Contrary to your puerile opinion of the purpose of the u.n.
This is from their charter.


The Purposes of the United Nations are:
To maintain international peace and security, and to that end: to take effective collective measures for the prevention and removal of threats to the peace, and for the suppression of acts of aggression or other breaches of the peace, and to bring about by peaceful means, and in conformity with the principles of justice and international law, adjustment or settlement of international disputes or situations which might lead to a breach of the peace;
To develop friendly relations among nations based on respect for the principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples, and to take other appropriate measures to strengthen universal peace;
To achieve international co-operation in solving international problems of an economic, social, cultural, or humanitarian character, and in promoting and encouraging respect for human rights and for fundamental freedoms for all without distinction as to race, sex, language, or religion; and
To be a centre for harmonizing the actions of nations in the attainment of these common ends.
Article 2
The Organization and its Members, in pursuit of the Purposes stated in Article 1, shall act in accordance with the following Principles.

The Organization is based on the principle of the sovereign equality of all its Members.
All Members, in order to ensure to all of them the rights and benefits resulting from membership, shall fulfill in good faith the obligations assumed by them in accordance with the present Charter.
All Members shall settle their international disputes by peaceful means in such a manner that international peace and security, and justice, are not endangered.
All Members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations.
All Members shall give the United Nations every assistance in any action it takes in accordance with the present Charter, and shall refrain from giving assistance to any state against which the United Nations is taking preventive or enforcement action.
The Organization shall ensure that states which are not Members of the United Nations act in accordance with these Principles so far as may be necessary for the maintenance of international peace and security.
Nothing contained in the present Charter shall authorize the United Nations to intervene in matters which are essentially within the domestic jurisdiction of any state or shall require the Members to submit such matters to settlement under the present Charter; but this principle shall not prejudice the application of enforcement measures under Chapter Vll.

We all realize how important you think you are as a member of your high school debate team but you really need to address facts and not your opinion of what is and is not.





thompsonx -> RE: Back from Iraq for a short time, ready to answer your questions if you have any... (7/8/2010 10:42:45 AM)

quote:

thompsonx: haliburton to get paid to rebuild. That hailburton sold off kbr somehow, to him, means that haliburton is no longer in business in iraq. REPEAT POINT

WRONG!

"KBR was working for Halliburton when they carried out logistics services for Iraq in the beginning of the war. Since then, Halliburton and KBR split, with KBR continuing with the services for troops in Iraq and Afghanistan, and Halliburton not being involved with Iraq or Afghanistan. So, if you're a stockholder with Halliburton, and they're not involved with Iraq today, then you're not doing what you insinuate you're doing." --herfacechair

"According to Halliburton, they're not involved with providing logistics services in Iraq." - herfacechair



Is it your position that halliburton is not in iraq or afghanistan and is not making any money there?



thompsonx -> RE: Back from Iraq for a short time, ready to answer your questions if you have any... (7/8/2010 10:45:12 AM)

thompsonx: and the destruction of billions of dollars of infrastructure for REPEAT POINT

The vast majority of the infrastructure decay took place as a result of decades of neglect, not because of the US invasion of Iraq. Our entry into Iraq resulted in reversing that trend, and in rebuilding their infrastructure. Though some of their cities have power outages, these outages don't last long. They spend more time with electricity than without... something that couldn't have been said for these same towns prior to the invasion.


Is it your position that iraq's infrastructure was falling down and the bombing was just a form of urban renewal?



domiguy -> RE: Back from Iraq for a short time, ready to answer your questions if you have any... (7/8/2010 10:48:06 AM)

Do you always start with a rue when making gumbo?



heartcream -> RE: Back from Iraq for a short time, ready to answer your questions if you have any... (7/8/2010 11:22:39 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: domiguy

Do you always start with a rue when making gumbo?


I start with Roo when making Gumby.



thompsonx -> RE: Back from Iraq for a short time, ready to answer your questions if you have any... (7/8/2010 11:25:56 AM)

WHERE, in my posts, do I say that we could smack officers around if we don't agree with their orders? Show me the EXACT words that I used that made you fart that comment out.

Now, let me go reeaal slllooooowww for you...

In that scenario, the officer ordered them to do something. The convoy commander offered up a suggestion, but guess what? THEY ENDED UP GOING. Where, in that scenario, does it state that the officer got knocked around in lieu of the convoy going to another outpost? It wasn't until after they FOLLOWED the officers order that they sustained the casualties, found out that the convoy commander was on the right track with his suggestion, and that they didn't have to sustain those casualties. In that instance, the officer got knocked on his azz after the fact, after his orders were followed.

Again, I offered to get a retard interpreter to simplify what I say so that you could understand it.

I thank you for your retarded translation of your retarded position That the ucmj allows you to bitch slap an officer in "your army". I do have a question for you and your retarded translator. Does the "bitch slapped" officer in question then get up and thank you for disabusing him/her of their ignorance or do they have you arrested for your oh so unmilitary conduct?



thompsonx -> RE: Back from Iraq for a short time, ready to answer your questions if you have any... (7/8/2010 11:35:58 AM)

quote:

My dad did six combat tours in Vietnam. He started as UDT, then became one of the original SEALS.


Of course he did just like jessie ventura.



pahunkboy -> RE: Back from Iraq for a short time, ready to answer your questions if you have any... (7/8/2010 1:05:29 PM)

the govt is right.  

end of thread.



thompsonx -> RE: Back from Iraq for a short time, ready to answer your questions if you have any... (7/8/2010 1:12:47 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

the govt is right.  

end of thread.



Be nice or they will fuck your pony



vincentML -> RE: Back from Iraq for a short time, ready to answer your questions if you have any... (7/8/2010 2:21:01 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: domiguy

Do you always start with a rue when making gumbo?


was gumbo an elephant or one of the Marx brothers?



mikeyOfGeorgia -> RE: Back from Iraq for a short time, ready to answer your questions if you have any... (7/8/2010 2:26:18 PM)

quote:

Back from Iraq for a short time, ready to answer your questions if you have any...


i have a question for the person who posted this thread

why go back? why not resign commission and stay here instead of going bad to fight someone else's war for them? and, before you say what i know you'll say, i say "Screw Orders" (but that's just me...of course, i wouldn't be over there in the first place, i would rather do the time in Leavenworth)



thompsonx -> RE: Back from Iraq for a short time, ready to answer your questions if you have any... (7/8/2010 5:57:59 PM)

quote:

My dad did 22 years in the Navy, I've lost count of all the Navy stories he talked about...

Like the time he was doing fire watch for a welder. He got tired of waiting on the welder. The welder was working slow as he was working by the hour. My dad grabbed the guy's torch and finished the job in minutes. Pissed the welder off.


It would appear that like you your dad was a moron and suffered from the same lack of discipline as do you.
His job was firewatch while the professional welder did his work. Your father decided to abandon his post and take the professional welders task. Why did he do that? Oh yes let me guess he knew better than his superiors what needed to be done so he disregarded his orders and did as he damn well pleased...so it is obvious that the apple falls not far from the tree.

quote:

My dad did 6 combat tours in Vietnam, first as UDT and later as a SEAL.

Bullshit...what years?





SL4V3M4YB3 -> RE: Back from Iraq for a short time, ready to answer your questions if you have any... (7/10/2010 1:05:15 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

quote:

Zero multiplied by any amount is still zero.


This is a pretty apt self analysis, concerning the volumninous posts, you have made.

What about infinity multiplied by 0, I've always wondered.



Page: <<   < prev  45 46 [47] 48 49   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875