RE: Newt Gingrich forecasts Obama loss (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Lucylastic -> RE: Newt Gingrich forecasts Obama loss (5/18/2010 2:50:33 PM)

Newt would hardly forecast a win for Obama





subtee -> RE: Newt Gingrich forecasts Obama loss (5/18/2010 3:01:53 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

Newt would hardly forecast a win for Obama




That's right, he wouldn't.

(?)




kittinSol -> RE: Newt Gingrich forecasts Obama loss (5/18/2010 3:02:09 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

Newt would hardly forecast a win for Obama



Right. The guy's hardly newtral.




subtee -> RE: Newt Gingrich forecasts Obama loss (5/18/2010 3:03:06 PM)

[sm=applause.gif] hahahaha




DomYngBlk -> RE: Newt Gingrich forecasts Obama loss (5/18/2010 3:03:22 PM)

You didn't just say newtral. Did you? :)





DomKen -> RE: Newt Gingrich forecasts Obama loss (5/18/2010 3:08:33 PM)

I'm hoping for a Palin/Gingrich dream ticket.




subtee -> RE: Newt Gingrich forecasts Obama loss (5/18/2010 3:15:24 PM)

Maybe Mark Souder...




thompsonx -> RE: Newt Gingrich forecasts Obama loss (5/18/2010 3:50:14 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

Newt would hardly forecast a win for Obama




Just because he is a lying,cheating,skeeming,coniving,back stabbing,short,fat,ugly unethical scumbag is no reason to gang-fuck him like this....
You are not suppose to use lube in this sort of situation....what were you girlz thinking?




Lucylastic -> RE: Newt Gingrich forecasts Obama loss (5/18/2010 3:58:36 PM)

The lube has sand in it....
Souder is a sweetheart too huh





zephyroftheNorth -> RE: Newt Gingrich forecasts Obama loss (5/18/2010 3:59:46 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

Newt would hardly forecast a win for Obama




Just because he is a lying,cheating,skeeming,coniving,back stabbing,short,fat,ugly unethical scumbag is no reason to gang-fuck him like this....
You are not suppose to use lube in this sort of situation....what were you girlz thinking?



I'm not sure what but something tells me you don't like Newt very much.




thompsonx -> RE: Newt Gingrich forecasts Obama loss (5/18/2010 4:04:50 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: zephyroftheNorth

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

Just because he is a lying,cheating,skeeming,coniving,back stabbing,short,fat,ugly unethical scumbag is no reason to gang-fuck him like this....
You are not suppose to use lube in this sort of situation....what were you girlz thinking?



I'm not sure what but something tells me you don't like Newt very much.



I do not know him well enough to dislike him I was simply making an observation based on his actions.




subtee -> RE: Newt Gingrich forecasts Obama loss (5/18/2010 4:11:41 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

Newt would hardly forecast a win for Obama




Just because he is a lying,cheating,skeeming,coniving,back stabbing,short,fat,ugly unethical scumbag is no reason to gang-fuck him like this....
You are not suppose to use lube in this sort of situation....what were you girlz thinking?



I'm a lousy Dominate




Musicmystery -> RE: Newt Gingrich forecasts Obama loss (5/18/2010 4:24:14 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


The thing about Newt that impresses me the most is how he sends all the hard core far left fanatics around the bend with the mere mention of his name.



Actually, as one who advocates compromise and working together, he's major league at odds with the Tea Party.

The conservatives shouted him down when he campaigned for the 23rd in NY.




InvisibleBlack -> RE: Newt Gingrich forecasts Obama loss (5/18/2010 7:56:46 PM)

While Newt has strength in certain segments of the voting public, I don't believe his general appeal is strong enough and I think he carries far too much baggage to be electable as President. He may well be highly influential behind the scenes in selecting who is the candidate, but I don't think he can carry the flag for the party.




TheHeretic -> RE: Newt Gingrich forecasts Obama loss (5/18/2010 9:44:04 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

you ain't real hard to impress are ya, Tom?  I will assume I was not included in the 'around the bend gang' because nobody does that for me, no matter how fucking stupid they are. 


I dunno, Ron. Sometimes it seems like your knee shifts all by itself when somebody says, "Reagan!"




popeye1250 -> RE: Newt Gingrich forecasts Obama loss (5/18/2010 10:07:40 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


Run, Newt, run! [:)]

quote:

Newt Gingrich forecasts Obama loss


Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich gives President Barack Obama only a 20 percent chance of being reelected — and says he might be the one to give Obama the boot.


Gingrich, who this week published a book called “To Save America: Stopping Obama’s Secular-Socialist Machine,” said he thinks Obama has “about one chance in five of getting reelected.” and called him “the closest thing to Jimmy Carter I’ve seen.” “Because he’s so radical, you’re now going to have, I think, the most consequential campaign since 1932,” when Franklin D. Roosevelt clobbered President Herbert Hoover, Gingrich said.


Giving predictions for November’s midterms, Gingrich said House Republicans will pick up “somewhere between 40 and 65 or 70 seats” — enough to gain control of the House. “I believe John Boehner will be speaker in January,” he said. Gingrich said he even sees a chance of Republican control of the Senate. “If they can beat Barbara Boxer [in California], I think that [Mitch] McConnell is going to be the Senate majority leader.”


The former speaker said there is “more of a possibility now” that he’ll run for president than when he was considering the idea ahead of the 2008 election. He said he’ll decide in February or March of next year and will base the decision partly on whether there is “a potential to raise the resources to be a serious, major candidate.”



Full article with video at: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0510/37399.html#ixzz0oI6TvTjw



Maybe he stole those figures from Dick Morris. Morris said that the Dems will lose both the house and the senate in November and after last night's elections it looks like we're headed down that road. And they said that the Tea Partiers (Brain's buddies) are starting to have a big effect!




Dubbelganger -> RE: Newt Gingrich forecasts Obama loss (5/18/2010 10:33:09 PM)

Gingrich used to live in the subdivision I live in now. Some of the geezers here make Popeye or Merc or inSanity look like Maoists.




DomKen -> RE: Newt Gingrich forecasts Obama loss (5/18/2010 11:42:08 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: popeye1250
Maybe he stole those figures from Dick Morris. Morris said that the Dems will lose both the house and the senate in November and after last night's elections it looks like we're headed down that road. And they said that the Tea Partiers (Brain's buddies) are starting to have a big effect!

Are you sure you meant last nights elections? The one where more votes were cast in the Democratic primaries than in the GOP? The one where the blowout GOP primary winner in in KY received less votes than the guy who lost the Democratic primary?




Sanity -> RE: Newt Gingrich forecasts Obama loss (5/19/2010 4:20:11 AM)

quote:

This isn't about dissatisfaction with the performance of the 44th President. Oh no. This is about demanding change in Washington - the very same change, by gum, that Barack Obama has been working so hard to bring about!

"Change that you can believe in" has gone from an over-worked campaign slogan to an unfalsifiable hypothesis. Vote for a Dem, you support the President's agenda for change. Vote for a GOPer, you support the President's agenda for change.

But how many Republican incumbents are in severe jeopardy of losing their seat in Congress to a Democratic challenger?


I count one: Joseph Cao of New Orleans.


Meanwhile, I count more than 20 Democrats in the House and Senate who are in severe jeopardy. Lower the threshold from "severe" to "serious" jeopardy, and I count maybe four Republicans and more than 50 Democrats.

The White House is absolutely, positively correct that there is a divide between America and Washington - but what they fail to appreciate (or, more likely, they appreciate it but want to fake-out the press) is that Washington, D.C. now belongs to Barack Obama.

Full article here




DarkSteven -> RE: Newt Gingrich forecasts Obama loss (5/19/2010 5:20:29 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity

quote:

This isn't about dissatisfaction with the performance of the 44th President. Oh no. This is about demanding change in Washington - the very same change, by gum, that Barack Obama has been working so hard to bring about!

"Change that you can believe in" has gone from an over-worked campaign slogan to an unfalsifiable hypothesis. Vote for a Dem, you support the President's agenda for change. Vote for a GOPer, you support the President's agenda for change.

But how many Republican incumbents are in severe jeopardy of losing their seat in Congress to a Democratic challenger?


I count one: Joseph Cao of New Orleans.


Meanwhile, I count more than 20 Democrats in the House and Senate who are in severe jeopardy. Lower the threshold from "severe" to "serious" jeopardy, and I count maybe four Republicans and more than 50 Democrats.

The White House is absolutely, positively correct that there is a divide between America and Washington - but what they fail to appreciate (or, more likely, they appreciate it but want to fake-out the press) is that Washington, D.C. now belongs to Barack Obama.

Full article here



The article assumes that the only way a Republican can lose is in the general election.  Bennet just lost in the primary, and it was due to the anti-incumbent mood.

The interesting question is, will the anti-incumbent mood affect the party or just the candidates?  R.g., will Sestak be viewed as part of the Dem party or as his own man?




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125