Real0ne -> RE: Guilty Verdict in Obama Trial (5/19/2010 2:41:04 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: mnottertail and it is tinfoil because none of those laws have the legal conclusions you say, or otherwise are trying to infer that they do. Wrong again and I wont hold my breath for even one second waiting for citations from you that either will never come or will be misapplied like you always do. LMAO the commercial crime one, is anyone in violation of those things you said in the jurisdiction of the atf (so burglary of alcohol, tobacco, or firearms, for example) are subject to seizure of property. DUH siezure of property is a dollar bill that belongs to me! my body, car, home any damn thing get a fucking clue! the color of law one: if someone using the law and acting under it), say a judge or other officer of the court, which would include police) deprive you of constitutional rights, you can sue them whether it is the federal or state government (in other words, sovereignty doesn't hold for them there. way to go you agree with me then disagree in the same sentence. you need to step back before you post shit or have someone read it to you out loud so you get a grip on what you are really saying so you dont always hit your dick with a hammer like you do. the third, if any two or more persons conspire to threaten, oppress, force or otherwise intimidate you for exercising or using your constitutional rights (here you want to think of things like lynching negros who vote).....and yes I know I used the old word.....but thats what sort of thing its about. Nothing that you are trying to tinfoil it into. Oh now its limited to lynching negros who vote, well I guess if that is the only right YOU got then thats what it is for YOU. DUH
|
|
|
|