RE: Guilty Verdict in Obama Trial (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


LadyEllen -> RE: Guilty Verdict in Obama Trial (5/21/2010 8:30:14 AM)

A question for the brighter Obama critics here - how long will Obama be the 44th President of the USA?

E




Termyn8or -> RE: Guilty Verdict in Obama Trial (5/21/2010 8:32:19 AM)

"thoroughly disproven "

Nope. Get it ? Shall we try this again ? Or are you just too dense to grasp the concept that I do not accept the same "proof" you do ? What is wrong with your comprehension that makes you ignorant of that fact ?

T




tazzygirl -> RE: Guilty Verdict in Obama Trial (5/21/2010 8:49:25 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyEllen

A question for the brighter Obama critics here - how long will Obama be the 44th President of the USA?

E


Until the 45th takes office?




RacerJim -> RE: Guilty Verdict in Obama Trial (5/21/2010 9:14:29 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: cuckoldmepls

I don't think the Supreme Court has the balls to disqualify him for President. They are too worried about race riots. This article is extremely interesting though.
http://www.eutimes.net/2010/04/entire-us-government-said-knows-obama-ineligible-for-office/


Exactly. I mean, imagine, just imagine the race riots if SCOTUS ruled that the first black POTUS in history was in fact ineligible and, as a result, Congress Impeached Obama out of office. That article is indeed extremely interesting.




RacerJim -> RE: Guilty Verdict in Obama Trial (5/21/2010 9:21:13 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

The article lies.

Per the article you posted...

quote:

The US Congress knows that Barack Hussein Obama is not constitutionally qualified for the office he holds. Although the congress passed a resolution proclaiming Senator John McCain a “natural born citizen” as the son of two US citizens, no such congressional resolution exists for Barack Hussein Obama.


You may want to read up on the following...


quote:

RESOLUTION

Recognizing and celebrating the 50th anniversary of the entry of Hawaii into the Union as the 50th State.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink


Whereas August 21, 2009, marks the 50th anniversary of Proclamation 3309, signed by Dwight D. Eisenhower, which admitted Hawaii into the Union in compliance with the Hawaii Admission Act (Public Law 86-3; 73 Stat. 4), enacted into law on March 18, 1959;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink


Whereas Hawaii is a place like no other, with people like no other, and bridges mainland United States to the Asia-Pacific region;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink


Whereas the 44th President of the United States, Barack Obama, was born in Hawaii on August 4, 1961;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink


Whereas Hawaii contributed to a more diverse Congress by electing--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink


http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-sr225/text


You Lie.

No where does sr225, the resolution you referenced, proclaim Barack Hussein Obama a "naturnal born citizen" as the son of two U.S. citizens...or any reasonable facimile thereto.




mnottertail -> RE: Guilty Verdict in Obama Trial (5/21/2010 9:25:52 AM)

Yeah, imagine, the Supreme Court of the United States (heavily conservative and republican) is afraid of a Democrat, and will evade their sworn duty ....let that be an example for the rest of you....LOL!!!!! The entire spectrum of the right is running scared.......

Firm and Rich --- you need to get some of these guys to STFU, they ain't helping you one bit out here.

Cordially,
Ron

(and it would be thereof, thanks for your legal opinion)




RacerJim -> RE: Guilty Verdict in Obama Trial (5/21/2010 9:38:22 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyEllen

A question for the brighter Obama critics here - how long will Obama be the 44th President of the USA?

E


Until 01/20/2012, unless of course some one/entity with the wherewithal has the integrity to make him prove he is eligible. Note that the Department of Hawaii Home Lands didn't accept a Hawaii "Certification of Live Birth" as prima-facie evidence of birth in Hawaii...at least it didn't until mid-2009 when it updated it's web-site...and it still requires both parents birth certificates et al documentation in addition to a "Certification of Live Birth".




tazzygirl -> RE: Guilty Verdict in Obama Trial (5/21/2010 9:47:24 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: RacerJim


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

The article lies.

Per the article you posted...

quote:

The US Congress knows that Barack Hussein Obama is not constitutionally qualified for the office he holds. Although the congress passed a resolution proclaiming Senator John McCain a “natural born citizen” as the son of two US citizens, no such congressional resolution exists for Barack Hussein Obama.


You may want to read up on the following...


quote:

RESOLUTION

Recognizing and celebrating the 50th anniversary of the entry of Hawaii into the Union as the 50th State.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink


Whereas August 21, 2009, marks the 50th anniversary of Proclamation 3309, signed by Dwight D. Eisenhower, which admitted Hawaii into the Union in compliance with the Hawaii Admission Act (Public Law 86-3; 73 Stat. 4), enacted into law on March 18, 1959;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink


Whereas Hawaii is a place like no other, with people like no other, and bridges mainland United States to the Asia-Pacific region;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink


Whereas the 44th President of the United States, Barack Obama, was born in Hawaii on August 4, 1961;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink


Whereas Hawaii contributed to a more diverse Congress by electing--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink


http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-sr225/text


You Lie.

No where does sr225, the resolution you referenced, proclaim Barack Hussein Obama a "naturnal born citizen" as the son of two U.S. citizens...or any reasonable facimile thereto.


It doesnt need to proclaim him the son of two US citizens. The fact that it proclaims him born in Hawaii is enough to satisfy the constitutional requirement to be a natural born citizen.




Politesub53 -> RE: Guilty Verdict in Obama Trial (5/21/2010 10:14:37 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

It doesnt need to proclaim him the son of two US citizens. The fact that it proclaims him born in Hawaii is enough to satisfy the constitutional requirement to be a natural born citizen.


Tazzy, stop being so damn sneaky and pointing out the obvious. It isn`t fair on Jim. [;)]




tazzygirl -> RE: Guilty Verdict in Obama Trial (5/21/2010 10:18:41 AM)

shucks... foiled again!




Lucylastic -> RE: Guilty Verdict in Obama Trial (5/21/2010 12:58:10 PM)

keep going tazzy, they are starting to falter... the truth tends to short out their right wing chips
the drool and foaming , is a side effect




DomKen -> RE: Guilty Verdict in Obama Trial (5/21/2010 2:42:00 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Yeah, imagine, the Supreme Court of the United States (heavily conservative and republican) is afraid of a Democrat, and will evade their sworn duty ....let that be an example for the rest of you....LOL!!!!! The entire spectrum of the right is running scared.......

Firm and Rich --- you need to get some of these guys to STFU, they ain't helping you one bit out here.

Cordially,
Ron

(and it would be thereof, thanks for your legal opinion)

That's the funny part to me. How fast do you think Roberts, Alito, Sclia and Thomas would overturn an election if they thought they could actually get away with it.




tazzygirl -> RE: Guilty Verdict in Obama Trial (5/22/2010 1:46:21 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

keep going tazzy, they are starting to falter... the truth tends to short out their right wing chips
the drool and foaming , is a side effect


I often wonder at their intelligence. Then i wonder at my own for even bothering to try. They have their minds made up. Rational discussion, facts and proof dont seem to matter.... unless its proving their point.




LadyEllen -> RE: Guilty Verdict in Obama Trial (5/22/2010 3:16:07 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: RacerJim


quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyEllen

A question for the brighter Obama critics here - how long will Obama be the 44th President of the USA?

E


Until 01/20/2012, unless of course some one/entity with the wherewithal has the integrity to make him prove he is eligible. Note that the Department of Hawaii Home Lands didn't accept a Hawaii "Certification of Live Birth" as prima-facie evidence of birth in Hawaii...at least it didn't until mid-2009 when it updated it's web-site...and it still requires both parents birth certificates et al documentation in addition to a "Certification of Live Birth".


Are you sure? You dont want to phone a friend?

January 20th 2012 - final answer?

Obama will no longer be the 44th President from that day?

Are you sure?

............we'll be right back, after this commercial break.

E




Termyn8or -> RE: Guilty Verdict in Obama Trial (5/22/2010 3:21:24 AM)

I see the error LE, but I am going to STFU until someone else catches it.

T




LadyEllen -> RE: Guilty Verdict in Obama Trial (5/22/2010 3:22:56 AM)

Thanks T - after all, its one of those things that just gets better with age, eh?

E




tazzygirl -> RE: Guilty Verdict in Obama Trial (5/22/2010 8:13:53 AM)

well, hell LadyE.

LOL

took me a while but i got it.

[;)]




LadyEllen -> RE: Guilty Verdict in Obama Trial (5/22/2010 8:28:50 AM)

Aint I a stinker? as Bugs Bunny might say.

Its a dreadfully easy question to answer after all, and yet only if one possesses the requisite comprehension skills to understand the question can one answer it satisfactorily.

E




mnottertail -> RE: Guilty Verdict in Obama Trial (5/22/2010 8:31:42 AM)

Albert Einstein said, 'Imagination is more important than knowledge'.

Let them dream, kids....let them dream.

(of course they ain't no Einsteins among em)




Real0ne -> RE: Guilty Verdict in Obama Trial (5/22/2010 7:44:56 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyEllen

Aint I a stinker? as Bugs Bunny might say.

Its a dreadfully easy question to answer after all, and yet only if one possesses the requisite comprehension skills to understand the question can one answer it satisfactorily.

E


his status is determined by his standing at the time.  if they changed the code now to be more lax it is not retroactive back to that day.

I really dont plan on getting into that foolishness again because its been hashed out a zillion times.

they only possible way to validate it is by the affidavit the doctor signed.  period







Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
4.492188E-02