KnightofMists
Posts: 7149
Joined: 7/29/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: leadership527 I don't know... it seems pretty straight forward to me. Both people tell the other what to do. They both act in good faith (which in this case would include not deliberately impeding the rightful authority of the other). I grant, it's unusual, but I see no generic reason why it is not functional and couldn't work for someone. As I noted, since I'm not real big on the whole "all-wise, all-knowing master" gig, it fits Carol and I in limited ways. Honestly, my opinion is that humans are endlessly varied and endless complex. I somehow doubt that the description given by the OP would actually fit the detailed reality any more than "master/slave" fits the detailed reality of Carol and I. But at the surface level, I see no reason why it could not work perfectly well. I think people acting in good faith is necessary in any relationship that people are trying to succeed, wouldn't you agree? But having good faith doesn't make a distinction why/how this particular type of relationship can/would succeed in comparison to the non-mutual slavery model. I believe it can work IF the proper foundation blocks are in place on how the authority would be exercise between them. The difficult from my perspective is that even when I give an order to my girls it affects me. There is no getting around it. I am a secondary affect to the orders I give my girls. In a Mutual slavery situation, this secondary affect can't be against the primary affect of another order. And that is what makes it complex but complex is not impossible.. but complex does mean the skill sets of those attempting it should be rather developed in my opinion.
_____________________________
Knight of Mists An Optimal relationship is achieved when the individuals do what is best for themselves and their relationship.
|