RE: An interesting piece of advice - do you agree with it? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


DesFIP -> RE: An interesting piece of advice - do you agree with it? (5/21/2010 4:22:47 PM)

Not necessarily. If you want a full relationship, lovers, friends, go to the movies together and so on, then certainly. If however you have someone else as a primary, then exchanging services whether contributing to the rent or mowing the lawn in exchange for topping is absolutely fine.

In a full relationship we exchange love, getting as much as we give. In a relationship that is otherwise structured you still need to give as well as take. If the nature of this giving involves gardening or car repair or cooking, why not? In the end the only thing you can say is that both parties are satisfied with what they get in exchange for what they give.

You don't get to tell someone else how to run their relationships.




SocratesNot -> RE: An interesting piece of advice - do you agree with it? (5/21/2010 4:32:45 PM)

I pretty much agree with you completely DesFIP, especially this part:

quote:

Not necessarily. If you want a full relationship, lovers, friends, go to the movies together and so on, then certainly.


[;)]




dreamerdreaming -> RE: An interesting piece of advice - do you agree with it? (5/21/2010 5:04:20 PM)

I don't like that you're basically saying that a female who dommed a guy online only, wouldn't be getting a WIITWD fix that way. I went to the referenced thread and commented there. If I dommed someone online only, you'd better believe I could make sure I got a domly dose from it (whether sexually or not) if I wanted to.




SocratesNot -> RE: An interesting piece of advice - do you agree with it? (5/21/2010 5:10:31 PM)

quote:

I don't like that you're basically saying that a female who dommed a guy online only, wouldn't be getting a WIITWD fix that way. I went to the referenced thread and commented there. If I dommed someone online only, you'd better believe I could make sure I got a domly dose from it (whether sexually or not) if I wanted to.


Great for you! I just said that most of the dommes wouldn't get wet from this. And I suggested that if she doesn't get wet from it, he should better stop expecting it to develope into a real, meaningful relationship. However, he can pay her for some online sessions, but this is not a relationship.

But in your case, the situation is completely different.




LadyNTrainer -> RE: An interesting piece of advice - do you agree with it? (5/21/2010 5:15:58 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SocratesNot
Of course there is more then one right way. There are hundreds of right ways. I am not telling people which way is right. I also expressed my opinion that one of those ways, the one that represents serious, long term, intimate relationship based exclusively on money or utility might be wrong.


The problem with assuming that *any* way of consensually running a human adult relationship might be wrong is that this also implies the assumption that there is such a thing as a right way.  And that just ain't so, as much as some people would like to believe it and enforce that  belief on others.  I'm sure the religious right would like to see us all making heterosexual love in the dark in the missionary position, and in a lot of places, they've even succeeded in making that the law.  Is that the kind of regime you want to encourage?


quote:

I am 100% sure that there are a lot of people for whom this way is perfectly right, and for them, the only thing that I did by giving this advice is making a fool of myself.


I'm glad you're honestly and clearly aware of that, because it is unfortunately true. 


quote:

If we were so abso-fucking-lutely concerned about the fact that "Not everybody is wired the same way as me. " we could NEVER EVER give ANY advice to anyone. And also this would mean that there is no such thing as human nature, and that there are no things which are more or less in common FOR EVERYONE.


Giving advice to a good friend, a child, a loved one or a family member is one thing.  You have the solid basis of knowing them and their situation.  Giving advice to strangers about how to run their relationships is a lot more likely to a) blow up in your face and piss people off, and b) be wrong anyway.

There are a few things that most human beings do have in common, but even those rules have exceptions.  And in this particular case, I think you're wrong about it even being a general rule.  Human relationships work on reciprocity, and the medium of exchange can vary.   There will always be idealists and romantics who insist that money should never be any part of this medium of exchange, or that it's always wrong to hit the people you love, or that homosexuality is sinful and evil.  And I'm sorry, but people who do this are assholes.  It is asshole behavior to run around telling other people what they "should" and "shouldn't" do in their adult relationships.  It's rude and unpleasant and condescending in at least six different ways.  If you do it, it will result in people thinking that you are an asshole and treating you accordingly. 

I think it's been made fairly clear that almost everyone in this thread is perceiving your "advice" to be rude, condescending, preachy, one true way-ism, negatively judgmental, being a nosy-parker, butting unreasonably into the private lives of other adults, etc.  Rather than blaming other people for being mean to you, might it not be wise to take a few minutes to think about what you might be doing to make people react in a consistently negative way? 

If one person calls me an ass, I can shrug and laugh it off.  If twenty people call me an ass, I had damn well better look behind me and check for ears and a tail, because it's a pretty good bet that I've been braying.  In a situation like this, it's a good idea to take a personal reality check and think harder about how you have been talking to people.  Unless you enjoy being seen as an ass, in which case, you don't need to do a thing.  Social Darwinism will doubtless take care of the situation, though probably not to your personal betterment. 




LuckyAlbatross -> RE: An interesting piece of advice - do you agree with it? (5/21/2010 5:21:34 PM)

I think the crux might be that SN thinks that "what gets you wet" is what really drives things, he doesn't understand it's a lot more complicated and varied than that.




DesFIP -> RE: An interesting piece of advice - do you agree with it? (5/21/2010 5:28:30 PM)

And he doesn't understand that for many dominants, of either gender, domination is what gets them wet whether online or not.

But his major problem is that all of this is conjecture because he has zero experience and needs to start dating and being honest with his dates about what he's hoping to explore. Get some experience, see how it goes and what you really do want versus what you imagine you want. Because the op is pretty much just talking through his hat.




SocratesNot -> RE: An interesting piece of advice - do you agree with it? (5/21/2010 5:33:36 PM)

OK, since everyone thinks I'm an ass and my advice is rude, and yet none of them said that they themselves would enjoy being in such a relationship which is based exclusively on money I challenge everyone who thinks that he or she would enjoy being in a relationship in which their partner like them ONLY because of their money or some other practical utility while at the same time being totally unattracted to them as persons to stand up and say, "Yes, I would enjoy being in such a relationship!" This way we can see how many people would really enjoy being in such a relationship and if it happens that there is a lot of them, I will gladly admit that I am the biggest ass and that the my whole advice was nothing but a pile of crap.




VaguelyCurious -> RE: An interesting piece of advice - do you agree with it? (5/21/2010 5:39:11 PM)

SN,

I can't speak for anyone else. I don't think you're an arse because I want my relationships to be based on material things. I think you're an arse because I find your presentation of your ideas unpleasant, your attitude grating and your refusal to acknowledge relationships that differ from your value system deeply annoying.

What I want or don't want from a relationship has no bearing on my opinion of you whatsoever.




LadyNTrainer -> RE: An interesting piece of advice - do you agree with it? (5/21/2010 5:43:41 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SocratesNot

OK, since everyone thinks I'm an ass and my advice is rude, and yet none of them said that they themselves would enjoy being in such a relationship which is based exclusively on money I challenge everyone who thinks that he or she would enjoy being in a relationship in which their partner like them ONLY because of their money or some other practical utility while at the same time being totally unattracted to them as persons to stand up and say, "Yes, I would enjoy being in such a relationship!"


Hello, I am a pro domme in addition to being a lifestyle domme in a femdom poly triad.  Those kinds of relationships work very well for me, and I am completely honest and aboveboard in engaging in them.  I get fairly compensated, and my clients also get what they want out of it.  What do you see about this picture that is wrong?  I do enjoy my work, and I'm proud that I can accomplish good things for my clients and genuinely motivate them to be fitter and healthier using a professional D/s relationship.  It's a win-win situation, and it works for everyone.


quote:

This way we can see how many people would really enjoy being in such a relationship and if it happens that there is a lot of them, I will gladly admit that I am the biggest ass and that the my whole advice was nothing but a pile of crap.


Would a utility relationship be everyone's first choice?  Probably not, but that doesn't mean a lot of people can't get good things out of them and be quite willing to engage in them, if their perfect Prince or Princess Charming isn't in their lives at the moment.  You don't really have any business telling other adults that they shouldn't do that, they should just wait for their ideal soulmate to show up and never engage in any kind of relationship that falls short of that.   There's not much difference between your position there and a Catholic priest telling people they should save all sexual intimacy until their marriage to the one person they must remain bound to for life.  Real life and real human nature doesn't tend to work that way, and sometimes it's a good thing to make the best of what you have, as long as it's consensual and healthy and fun for everyone.




LadyPact -> RE: An interesting piece of advice - do you agree with it? (5/21/2010 5:43:56 PM)

Right here, sweetheart.

I've written on these boards many times that My first dynamic was based on service and protocol.  Please feel free to check My prior posts on these boards to confirm that.

No sex and no sexual attraction.




VaguelyCurious -> RE: An interesting piece of advice - do you agree with it? (5/21/2010 5:48:06 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyNTrainer

It's a win-win situation
Speaking of which:

Generally, LnT, I am of the opinion that you are made of sheer win. Today, particularly so [:)]




SocratesNot -> RE: An interesting piece of advice - do you agree with it? (5/21/2010 5:57:29 PM)

Well, first, pro-domming is not a long term, personal, intimate relationship.
Second, so far we only had dommes responding. What I am actually waitng for is a sub who will say "I enjoy being in a relationship in which I am desired only because of my money and not because any of my other personal characteristics"

Third, I must admit that the following is a very wisely said:

quote:

Would a utility relationship be everyone's first choice?  Probably not, but that doesn't mean a lot of people can't get good things out of them and be quite willing to engage in them, if their perfect Prince or Princess Charming isn't in their lives at the moment.  You don't really have any business telling other adults that they shouldn't do that, they should just wait for their ideal soulmate to show up and never engage in any kind of relationship that falls short of that.   There's not much difference between your position there and a Catholic priest telling people they should save all sexual intimacy until their marriage to the one person they must remain bound to for life.  Real life and real human nature doesn't tend to work that way, and sometimes it's a good thing to make the best of what you have, as long as it's consensual and healthy and fun for everyone.


In the absence of "ideal" relationship (actually there is no such thing as ideal relationship) many other things are also acceptable and people should really try to make the best of what they have, even when this includes some compromises.

However, I just gave an advice. There are so many "not so ideal" relationships which have some element of economical benefits in them, but that are not exclusively based on it. Such relationships can definitely work. But I would really avoid relationship in which it was extremely clear that I am not desired for anything else but for my money. I would rather find many times less attractive partner who would be able to recognize some other qualities in me except money.




VaguelyCurious -> RE: An interesting piece of advice - do you agree with it? (5/21/2010 6:06:24 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SocratesNot

What I am actually waitng for is a sub who will say "I enjoy being in a relationship in which I am desired only because of my money and not because any of my other personal characteristics"
That may well not happen; these boards (and I say this with the greatest affection) are slanted towards a particular flavour of Fd/ms dynamic; touchy-feely, D/s or M/s rather than top/bottom, with the subs held in high esteem and expected to excel; male subs who come on the boards and say things like the quote above tend to get laughed out of cybertown.

That doesn't mean they don't exist-but this board is not necessarily representative of wiitwd as a whole and you're unlikely to find them here.




LadyPact -> RE: An interesting piece of advice - do you agree with it? (5/21/2010 6:12:18 PM)

Oh, VC, we've had it all wrong all along.

Service subs don't exist.

Financial subs don't exist.

Cuckolds don't exist.

Protocol/leather slaves don't exist.  (Those are folks who enter a dynamic specifically because they love the leather lifestyle.)

Nope.  None of them.  They don't fit into the One True Way.



Edited to Add - I'm sorry, but I just can't let the above bullshit be stated without the disclaimer.  There ARE some very good subs on these boards who fit into these categories.  If I wanted to have the same lack of social grace as the OP on these boards, I'd name them. 




CarrieO -> RE: An interesting piece of advice - do you agree with it? (5/21/2010 6:14:30 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SocratesNot

I challenge everyone who thinks that he or she would enjoy being in a relationship in which their partner like them ONLY because of their money or some other practical utility while at the same time being totally unattracted to them as persons to stand up and say, "Yes, I would enjoy being in such a relationship!"


You asked this question ...recieved answers...and then say...

quote:


Second, so far we only had dommes responding. What I am actually waitng for is a sub who will say "I enjoy being in a relationship in which I am desired only because of my money and not because any of my other personal characteristics"


which totally negates the opinions given because you didn't clarify.

Earlier in the thread you were told THIS by Rochsub2009.  I don't think you'll be happy with any answer given unless it supports your view of what a D/s relationship should be.

You're spinning in circles.




LadyNTrainer -> RE: An interesting piece of advice - do you agree with it? (5/21/2010 6:18:59 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: SocratesNot
Well, first, pro-domming is not a long term, personal, intimate relationship.


It's not? Tell that to some of my really long term clients.



quote:

Second, so far we only had dommes responding. What I am actually waitng for is a sub who will say "I enjoy being in a relationship in which I am desired only because of my money and not because any of my other personal characteristics"


Men who self-identify as "pay pigs" do definitely exist in numbers on these sites, but they show up in domme inboxes, not on the forums for the most part, unless they're doing a one-shot introduction or personals ad. Your survey response is going to be inherently skewed because of the venue you're asking in.

The question I would ask males on these forums is, "Would you accept being in a reciprocal exchange relationship with a femdom where you earn your play time with her by bringing material benefit to her life with your money or labor? Or would you insist on holding out for a femdom who falls madly in love with you and desires you deeply and immediately, and remain completely alone and without any D/s play or relationship until then?" I suspect there would be a lot of answers on both sides of the spectrum.


quote:

However, I just gave an advice.


No, really. Try to stop giving advice. That's not been working so well for you, has it?


quote:

I would really avoid relationship in which it was extremely clear that I am not desired for anything else but for my money. I would rather find many times less attractive partner who would be able to recognize some other qualities in me except money.


Great, good, wonderful, fine. Please do what works for you. But for Ghu's sake, let the rest of us adults decide on our own what we should be doing in our own relationships. Respect us that much, and we're more likely to do the same for you.




VaguelyCurious -> RE: An interesting piece of advice - do you agree with it? (5/21/2010 6:19:27 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

Oh, VC, we've had it all wrong all along.

Service subs don't exist.

Financial subs don't exist.

Cuckolds don't exist.

Protocol/leather slaves don't exist.  (Those are folks who enter a dynamic specifically because they love the leather lifestyle.)

Nope.  None of them.  They don't fit into the One True Way.

Nonononono, LP-it can't be. We can't be wrong. The LPster and the VCster are NEVER WRONG, d'you hear?

All the subs you've listed above just have low self-esteem; if we made them be dominant for a day they would ALL BE CURED.

That way we haven't got it wrong; we just need to shove whips in their hands and they will return to the OTW! [:D]




Rochsub2009 -> RE: An interesting piece of advice - do you agree with it? (5/21/2010 6:19:39 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SocratesNot

OK, since everyone thinks I'm an ass and my advice is rude, and yet none of them said that they themselves would enjoy being in such a relationship which is based exclusively on money I challenge everyone who thinks that he or she would enjoy being in a relationship in which their partner like them ONLY because of their money or some other practical utility while at the same time being totally unattracted to them as persons to stand up and say, "Yes, I would enjoy being in such a relationship!"



Yes, i would enjoy being in such a relationship. 

i've tried  to pretend like She likes me for other reasons, but i know that VaguelyCurious only wants me for my 10 inch penis.  But i'm okay with that.  [:D]




Rochsub2009 -> RE: An interesting piece of advice - do you agree with it? (5/21/2010 6:21:28 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: domiguy

Rochsub wanted to say that.... He actually hates you. Really hates you.



Damn, Domi.  You said you were going to keep that secret.   [;)]




Page: <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875