RE: PLAYERS

RE: PLAYERS (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion

Message

IronBear -> RE: PLAYERS (4/13/2006 9:13:24 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: dancerdj43 My question is very simple....Why is it that males on here often are looked upon as PLAYERS and the Females get Played? I find many females are extreme players and won't even respond to messeges even with a polite "no thank you" Under My definition we are all players. however under your personal definition, I guess I'm a player too. Why? You may well ask, because if you write to me and the message containe any or all of the following, I delete and ignor: The continued use of the word "like" in almost every sentence. The use of TXT Message abreviations such as UR CULTR, B4 etc ad nausium. Abuse of myself, my Wife/FC or my home. Threats, I report them and have other people in a Govt Department take a look too. The message is so badly written that it is almost illegable. Call me a player if you wish but at least for pity sake learn to use it correctly and don't define it for your own use..

ModeratorEleven -> RE: PLAYERS (4/13/2006 9:24:33 AM)
I can't help it, but every time I see this thread I get the picture in my head of a Telly Savalas "Players Club" commercial from the 70's. Who loves ya baby! XI

IronBear -> RE: PLAYERS (4/13/2006 9:54:03 AM)
OK Mod XI now your showing your age.... I'd forgotten that one ..... Thank you for the reminder......

SuperbigGoddess -> RE: PLAYERS (4/13/2006 10:17:08 AM)
It just really gets me mad to think if these idiots who send mails, talk to you and then ring you. All on the pretext of meeting up, then for no apparent reason they disapear, or not turn up for the meeting.[:@] I really think they are mindless fuckwits!!!!! Goddess

IronBear -> RE: PLAYERS (4/13/2006 12:39:25 PM)
I'd sat they're down right ignorant or a card carrying member of the white feather club.....

Larry862 -> RE: PLAYERS (4/13/2006 12:58:07 PM)
I have read threads on this subject off and on over the years. Why do women never respond to emails, why do Dom's disappear after emailing and planning a meet. etc.. Honestly I think the best explanation I have ever come up with or read is this. The world is filled with all types of people. People with varying interests and fanatsies. Some ( I think a lot) people fanatisie about this lifestyle but when it comes to actually meeting and taking that big step they let fear or uncertainty chase them off. I try to write emails to female subs/slaves with a breif introduction, a little bit about why I am looking and asking for a reply with some information about her. I would venture a guess that far less than 10% bother to answer. It's life I don't cry about it I move on. I have neither the time or the engery to waste. The ones that have replied and I have met with over the many years all have been great. I can only think of one that after emailing and chatting and meeting and planning subsequent meets weirded out on me. We never did meet again. The other thing to remember is that the ratio of men to women is like 30 to 1 so one can only imagine the amount of mail a woman must get on site of this lifestyle. It does not excuse not replying but hey, it's life!

DesertRat -> RE: PLAYERS (4/13/2006 1:30:25 PM)
Before she deactivated her profile, my slave got several emails every day from Doms asking if she would be interested in talking with them about becoming theirs. This, in spite of the statement at the very top of her profile stating that she is owned. Why reply to someone who either hasn't bothered to read the profile or else is clueless and rude enough to "go for it" even after having read it? It has nothing to do with being a "player". I read and control all of her email, and after seeing the kind of things guys send out, I'd say even an unattached sub is completely justified in ignoring most of them. Bob

justmeagain69 -> RE: PLAYERS (4/13/2006 1:52:23 PM)
quote: It has nothing to do with being a "player". I read and control all of her email, and after seeing the kind of things guys send out, I'd say even an unattached sub is completely justified in ignoring most of them. Thank you thank you. It is so hard sometimes to weigh my almost need to not be rude against the completely ridiculous emails I have gotten. It is nice to know that everyone doesnt consider you a player just because you refuse to dignify some messages with a response. The part I hate most is the one word "hiya" , "Daddy is here." and "care to chat" emails. My personal feeling is that if you cannot be bothered to at least tell me who you are, what your looking for, something more revealing then 3 words in your first message to me, you wont be getting a response, no matter how perfect your profile may look. Course, Im still an "unattached" submissive, so maybe thats why too shrugs

SweetPosession -> RE: PLAYERS (4/14/2006 12:00:26 AM)
"Players" is a term for people who play, AKA all of us. I've not heard it used as a negative lable here, but if that's going on it's really unfortunate.

Arpig -> RE: PLAYERS (4/14/2006 12:10:15 AM)
quote: I've not heard it used as a negative lable here My God man!! Where have you been? It is a favourite derogatory term around here. In theory it means somebody who just plays at being into BDSM in order to get some easy online thrills.

Page: << < prev 1 2 [3]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

1.513672E-02