crazyml -> RE: Are you mentally ill ? (5/26/2010 11:58:40 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Aneirin I am beginning to notice quite a disturbing trend with fora, a situation where if a person has an unusual viewpoint, they can be accused of being mentaly ill, just what is this all about I guess, for me at least, it's a question of extent. Most of the "Unusual viewpoints" I see would strike me as "quirky" rather than mentally ill. But, I have also seen examples where posters have expressed desires that, if they are genuine, would absolutely, 100% pop them into the category of "bonkers". quote:
As far as I am aware the only people who can diagnose mental illness are the psychiatry profession, not any other, despite what they think they know or have read, No ethically responsible psychiatrist would make a diagnosis on the basis of someone's posts in a forum. But they may express an opinion, just as the rest of us are absolutely, and fundamentally entitled to express ours - despite what we may think we know, not know, have read, or not have read. Again, I don't toss the "you're mad" line around often (not sure when I last did) - but, if someone posts that it is their sincere desire to hack a leg off and serve it up to their dom for supper, then please forgive me if I express my non-professional opinion (I stress - not a diagnosis) that that person is fucking bonkers. quote:
so what is it with people, is this accusation of mental illness a means of destabilising an other in a conversation or what ? I've not seen much evidence of it used as a ploy in this way. But I suppose it could be. quote:
Could it be because of the work of the psychiatric establishment more and more differences are being discovered and those differences applied where necessary, people, the general public like to see these differences in people all around them ? I didn't quite follow this. quote:
Why is it, I ask of those who are keen to suggest mental illness in others, what do you get from it, is it a feeling of superiority by the dumbing down of another based upon a self belief, or is it you do genuinely care for that individual ? I've just not seen any people here who I'd say were "keen to suggest mental illness in others". quote:
Is it even just an act of obfuscation, by the labelling of others with a malady, you automatically get the moral high ground? Is this the new weapon to discredit others in debate and conversation ? You've kinda asked this already quote:
But there is one good thing out of this drive to discover and label mental illness, for the more advanced the professionals become, no doubt the more labels will be created and with that a majority might form, a majority of those classed as mentally ill until such a point they hold up their hands and surrender with the ultimate understanding that every single one of us is either mentally ill, or just plain different and that is the be all and end all of it. I think you do the psychiatric community a very slight disservice here - the goal of discovery and classification is, I would argue, motivated by a desire help people better manage mental illness when it occurs - not to find a way of labelling all of us. quote:
We then of course have to learn to accept our differences. I doub't that we will (alas). To the OP: Mental illness is a properly complex topic in the context of BDSM as well as being hugely controversial. And I may be about to piss some people off... but what the hey! - I do believe that there is a higher than average incidence of disfunction within the BDSM community. I don't know this, but that is the impression that I have. - I regularly see profiles that, if genuine, are describing people who, in my unqualified and subjective opinion, would be far better served getting therapy than logging on to a kinky web site. - I believe that there IS a line where a responsible person has a duty to ask "is this Sane?" We draw the line in different places, some will take a very libertarian view ("It's your life/body do what the fuck you want to it") others will take a utiliarian view ("Do what ever you like as long as you don't create shit for other people") and yet others will take a paternalistic view ("I get to decide what you can do..."). Personally I'm a utilitarian (intellectually at least)- If you're into CP, CBT, Body-Mod - then fill your boots. But even then, there's a line - (it's an emotional one, and somewhat at odds with my "utilitarian" stance) where a voice says "Fuck that! If you really desire that then you need help". And when this happens I'm conflicted - because ethically I feel a responsibility to speak out even if my non-emotional utilitarian head is saying "You promised yourself you'd stay out of it!". A couple of examples - Body mod (implants, enlargements, reductions..) = all fair game. Extreme self mutilation - Get help. So what's the distinction - Well, I can't give you a clear cut distinction, I just know it when I see it (This is why we need psychiatrists to classify and codify btw). SO... if you see people rushing to judge, and you suspect they might be doing it for selfish motives or simply to undermine the other party then give me a shout and I'll join you in condemning them. But I suspect that most of the occasions when someone is regarded as bonkers by another, it's because that person genuinely believes it. If you see me say someone's a nutter - then call me out on it. It could be that I'm just responding to a gut reaction which is as likely to be based on irrationality and prejudice as anyone else's - and by calling me out you'll be doing me a favour by helping me challenge that. But if I see someone describing desires that I, in my subjective and non-qualified, opinion believe are signs of being nutty, I have a responsibility to myself and to them to say so.
|
|
|
|