thompsonx -> RE: Immigration debate, legal charges against employers (5/28/2010 9:40:24 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: AnimusRex OK, I will wade into this once again. I posted on another thread (which I can't find now) that we have no problem with a globalized economy, where capital and property flow effortlessly across borders, but somehow labor cannot. Let look at an example- Suppose I own a cabinet shop, making kitchen cabinets for houses. If I hire Mexican craftsmen to build them, I am a criminal. The craftsmen live in Los Angeles, spend their paychecks in LA, pay SS taxes (paying into other peoples accounts!) and in general, act just like any American citizen living and working in LA. If I move the shop to Mexico and have those very same craftsmen build them, I am a clever businessman, entitled to enjoy my profits. The craftsmen live in Mexico, pay Mexican taxes, spend all their money in Mexico. So which scenario is preferable? Neither. How bout we have citizens work in your cabinet shop. How bout those products which are made outside of this country which compete with products made in this country be taxed to the point that they are not cheaper than domestically produced product.. Oh, and by the way- with a globalized economy, using American craftsmen is NOT an option. sorry, the cabinet marketplace demands low-wage labors. No the cabinet marketplace demands highly skilled workers. That is why cabinet makers are paid more than framers. My point, is that the marketplace in America demands low wage labor for certain things like low skilled labor. We could attract Americans to these fields by increasing the minimum wage, but that seems politically unpopular. The abolition of slavery and womans sufferage were politically unpopular also So we settle for an unworkable solution, which is to set immigration quotas artificially low, yet patronize businesses that use undocumented workers, all with a wink and a nod. Only the ethically challanged do so.
|
|
|
|