RE: Immigration debate, legal charges against employers (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


pahunkboy -> RE: Immigration debate, legal charges against employers (5/28/2010 7:32:21 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

quote:

ORIGINAL: catfightservice

Right on Animusrex!!!!!Like my point about walmart. They dont use migrant labor. They just buy EVERYTHING from China. Now they are a legit super corporation. As they bleed American industry untill its dead. I mean I called a supportline for a computer printer I bought from walmart that had problems, and I was talking to people from india. Imagine that ? it is cheaper for them to hire people from india to answer the phone, and pay long distance, than it is to pay an american minnimum wage here.


If you feel that way, why did you buy the printer there to begin with?




To have another piece of broken junk around the house.  I have 5 broken printers here.  I gave up on my quest to print. I am too uneducated for that task.




domiguy -> RE: Immigration debate, legal charges against employers (5/28/2010 7:36:16 AM)

You folks have not the capacity to understand the world as it is.

It is a global marketplace. Racerjim wants to shoot the illegals because he doesn't understand the situation at hand. He is an idiot.

Our car companies aside from Ford should be things of the past. We rewarded them for not staying competitive.


You don't want to have your job replaced overseas or by a new immigrant or an illegal? Then take the time to make yourself valuable.

Our economy has to take a hit while those around us begin to rise. There can be no other path.




domiguy -> RE: Immigration debate, legal charges against employers (5/28/2010 7:39:20 AM)

I am sure that many of you fuckers that are bitching about illegals are some of the very same people that didn't have the ability or the desire to make yourself have any type of value in the market place....And now you want to be bailed out.

Shame on you.




catfightservice -> RE: Immigration debate, legal charges against employers (5/28/2010 8:03:52 AM)

the people in india I talked to about my printer spoke excellent engilsh. Better english than most rap artists ive heard. I just asked them where they are from like I do everyone that has an accent. Its just interesting for me....I bought my printer from Walmart because I dont have another option in my area. There used to be a "Mom and Pop" computerplace down thestreet, but they vanished since the arrival of big W.....

food for thought....

I wish we could deport, or revoke citeznship of some of the american degenerates right here. On the other side of town there is low income assisted housing development. Those people only pay a fraction of their rent costs, recieve food stamps, and free healthcare. Half of the residents there standaround smokingweed, getting drunk everyday, and just scheme ways to leach the system. Freakin lowlifes. Just strolling thru life on our dime. Why can't we sendthem out of this country? At least an illegal comes here and works. Now you have people born here, that jus sit down and drain society. But they are LEGAL. Doccumented low lifes.




truckinslave -> RE: Immigration debate, legal charges against employers (5/28/2010 8:06:04 AM)

"Those who would eat the ships stores would do the ships work" No workee, no eatee. First law made here by a European.

Revival time?




rulemylife -> RE: Immigration debate, legal charges against employers (5/28/2010 8:17:42 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: KYsissy

From my experience the vast majority of those coming here illegally are some of the hardest working motherf'res I have seen. They do drywall, roofing, dig trenches and a host of other menial jobs that people born here just won't do. 



While I will agree they are hard workers, I do not agree that they are doing jobs Americans will not do.


Mohawk Industries, a Georgia carpet company, settles RICO case

Mohawk Industries, a Georgia business which makes carpet and flooring, recently agreed to settle a labor lawsuit for $18 million. The suit alleged RICO violations involving the regular hiring of illegal immigrants. The suit was brought by current and former employees who complained that the company’s hiring practices resulted in lower wages for employees lawfully in the country.




Tyson Foods Faces Suit over Illegal Workers : NPR

OTT: All in a day's work, but attorney Howard Foster says there's nothing routine about how Tyson does business. Foster represents Tyson employees who say they're underpaid because the company hires illegal immigrants who will work for less.

Mr. HOWARD FOSTER (Attorney): This has been successful in lowering the wages by something like 10 to 30 percent.




thishereboi -> RE: Immigration debate, legal charges against employers (5/28/2010 8:19:21 AM)

I agree...you are a piece of work alright.




pahunkboy -> RE: Immigration debate, legal charges against employers (5/28/2010 8:20:47 AM)

My brother flips houses- and he does his own work.  He was unable to even get illegals to assist with his roof--   of course now that the economy is bad- people call for work left and right- but it is too late- - houses are not moving. 


Interesting tho- how these guys suddenly are available.




cuckoldmepls -> RE: Immigration debate, legal charges against employers (5/28/2010 8:24:51 AM)

People you don't even know what's happening to you. Basically, what they have done is converted us from a manufacturing economy into an economy based on population growth. There's no possible way our manufacturing industry can compete with 3rd world countries and their slave labor. In fact, they aren't even trying. Half the corporations have already shut down factories and moved them to Mexico. We will lose this competition, and we are losing it as evidence by the latest economic crisis. If they continue going down this same path it will only get worse in the long term.

Think about it. Have they changed the fundamentals of the economy? Have they done anything about free trade agreements or Illegal aliens? Although Obama's popularity began to rise during the campaign when he talked about cancelling NAFTA or at least renegotiating it, it's not likely you will hear another word about it. He also hasn't done anything about Illegal aliens. The black unemployment rate is officially over 16% and unofficially probably about 20%, yet Obama does nothing. The fundamentals have not changed. All they have done is propped us back up for a little while longer.

Something else to think about as well is that these corporations who do make some money overseas are still not coming out ahead. Let's take GM for example. They made $2 billion in China, but it is estimated they lost $8 billion in sales to foreign automakers last year. I wonder why they needed a bailout???

People it's just not smart to let Walmart, and McDonalds profit worldwide while America goes under.

www.apathetic-usa.com







Moonhead -> RE: Immigration debate, legal charges against employers (5/28/2010 8:30:42 AM)

They? Who's they in this case? The Illuminati? Whitley Streiber's short grey friends from outer space? The Elders of Zion? The Masons?
My recollection is that it was your man Reagan who set the ball rolling on dismatling American industry and shipping jobs overseas. Surely from your viewpoint the wanker was "us" rather than "them"?




Vendaval -> RE: Immigration debate, legal charges against employers (5/28/2010 8:34:15 AM)

If you go back to the rest of this post please notice I am being specific to the employment market in California. The states with the highest percentage of illegal immigrants are California, Texas and Florida.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7255409




quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

quote:

Typically your front of house staff at a restaurant or hotel is US born and the janitors, maids, laundry, etc are immigrants. And this is true for small businesses through the big mega-chains.


I worked at a Days Inn as a maid and it was about 1/2 and 1/2. The timeshares I worked at as a maid were about the same. But then again, maybe they weren't the typical maid jobs you were talking about. I suppose it's a good thing no one told me I wasn't supposed to want that type of job, or I might not have applied in the first place and unemployment sucks.





cuckoldmepls -> RE: Immigration debate, legal charges against employers (5/28/2010 8:35:41 AM)

By the way, it's obvious free trade isn't the answer, but unions driving up wages are not the answer either. What is the answer is using internal competition from within the United States, and preventing mergers that eliminate the competition. We must drive down wages at the top, not raise minimum wage to be closer to theirs. Raising minimum wage causes inflation, driving down wages at the top lowers the cost of products and services.

Simply put, a $5 an hour worker can't afford to buy a car made by a $20 an hour. The more you drive down wages at the top, the more the middle class can buy. The middle class drives the economy.

The liberal policy is to raise minimum wage to try to lower the gap between overpaid union wages. This is insane. Union and minimum wage increases only drive up the cost of everything.

So basically neither party has it right. The republicans have fooled themselves into thinking that free trade is the answer, and the democrats definitely are living in fantasy land.

As proof I am right, consider the last time we had budget surpluses which was during the Clinton administration. Well Clinton inherited that economy from Reagan. It always takes 5 to 10 years for the tax, trade and economic policies to become apparent. Then Clinton goes and signs NAFTA, and the Chinese trade deal with the urging of a republican congress and look at us now. We have no hope of a permanent recovery simply because they have not changed the fundamentals of the economy.




thishereboi -> RE: Immigration debate, legal charges against employers (5/28/2010 8:36:49 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Vendaval

If you go back to the rest of this post please notice I am being specific to the employment market in California. The states with the highest percentage of illegal immigrants are California, Texas and Florida.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7255409




quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

quote:

Typically your front of house staff at a restaurant or hotel is US born and the janitors, maids, laundry, etc are immigrants. And this is true for small businesses through the big mega-chains.


I worked at a Days Inn as a maid and it was about 1/2 and 1/2. The timeshares I worked at as a maid were about the same. But then again, maybe they weren't the typical maid jobs you were talking about. I suppose it's a good thing no one told me I wasn't supposed to want that type of job, or I might not have applied in the first place and unemployment sucks.




I was living in Florida at the time.




pahunkboy -> RE: Immigration debate, legal charges against employers (5/28/2010 8:44:35 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

They? Who's they in this case? The Illuminati? Whitley Streiber's short grey friends from outer space? The Elders of Zion? The Masons?
My recollection is that it was your man Reagan who set the ball rolling on dismatling American industry and shipping jobs overseas. Surely from your viewpoint the wanker was "us" rather than "them"?



Does it matter who "they" are.

"they" have won.




cuckoldmepls -> RE: Immigration debate, legal charges against employers (5/28/2010 8:45:31 AM)

There is a pbs documentary tonight I believe on the democratic 1930's recovery programs that got us out of the depression. Don't be fooled. The difference between then and now, is that we weren't $10 trillion in debt. Any spending program we launch now will only get us in deeper.

Ross Perot had an excellent quote on that.

"Before the great depression our country was in good financial shape and was a positive constructive force in getting us through it. This time around if we have a financial melt down our government, because of its weak financial condition, will be a liability and people will suffer for decades and you and I will not let that happen. Right? Right."

Unfortunately, democratic voters did not vote to turn things around, instead they used the split vote that was divided between bush and Perot to put Clinton in office.

Biggest mistake America ever made.




Vendaval -> RE: Immigration debate, legal charges against employers (5/28/2010 8:50:03 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

quote:

ORIGINAL: Vendaval

IMO, jailing the restaurant owner and seizing his property goes too far because of the economic impact on the local economy. I am fine with him paying fines and being checked by ICE on a regular basis. But the taxpayers will pay for a trial and any jail/prison time.
So if someone commits a crime, we shouldn't have a trial, because it will cost too much?

Please note that my responses here are specific to this case and the long term economic impact to this particular community.




And why a private business? Why not go after a chain restaurant? Or a major hotel chain?
Personally I think they should go after any business that is operating illegally. Not sure what difference it makes if it's a chain or single owner.

The big corporations have higher numbers, deeper pockets and higher visibility.



And if his business closes all the taxes and paychecks it provides goes away in that community too. If his long term workers have no record of criminal activities in the form of theft, robbery, violence, etc then they would be good candidates for amnesty. Again, I understand the sentiment of making a public example for political points but am thinking about the economic effects to that community.

IME living in California, the majority of restaurant and hotel workers behind the scenes are immigrants. If most of them were deported there would be a severe labor shortage and potential increase in prices for these goods and services. Most people born and raised here seem to think that working as a maid, janitor, bus person (removing dirty dishes), dishwasher, laundry workers, etc is too hard, too dirty and beneath them.
I think it's just great that you folks in California have this amazingly cheap labor force. But do you honestly think its ok to keep paying them lower wages and offering lousy work conditions just to keep your states bottom line in the black. Don't you care about the thousands of illegals who are being forced into slave labor situations just to keep the cost of fruit down?

If you go back to the original post again, I am being specific to this particular case. If this restaurant owner goes to jail and his business is seized and closed all those people working for him will be unemployed.

Several of my family members have done this kind of work in the past.
I support the reforms for workers and admire the leadership of César Chávez and Dolores Huerta and others who have worked to end exploitation of migrant workers. The current system is not working and needs to be reformed.








tazzygirl -> RE: Immigration debate, legal charges against employers (5/28/2010 8:51:22 AM)

Allow me a moment to make a point.

Illegals often, though not always, are paid under the table if they cannot provide a SS number. As such they are paid less, again, not in all cases, but in many. And there is a reason for this. The tax benefit to the employer.

Lets say a US employee makes 10 dollars an hour. The illegal is paid 8. The employer makes out by not having to pay all those pesky taxes, Medicare, Fica, State and Federal. Then there is payroll cost savings... cheaper just to give out cash.

quote:

Typically your front of house staff at a restaurant or hotel is US born and the janitors, maids, laundry, etc are immigrants. And this is true for small businesses through the big mega-chains.


Typically... actually, in reality, your front of the house staff at restaurants are a small... extremely small... percentage of payroll. In PA, the base salary for a server is 2.83. The rest they make on their tables. My back of the house makes a whole lot more than that. The rest i have to earn on my own. There are days i make 20-30 an hour and up. There are days i dont even make minimum. Its the nature of the business. Using this to make an example of the underpayment of illegals is nonsense.




pahunkboy -> RE: Immigration debate, legal charges against employers (5/28/2010 8:53:12 AM)

Taz,  I dont think a restaurant was a good place to bust.


Try a factory where there is a job loss.    A job that would have paid a living wage.





domiguy -> RE: Immigration debate, legal charges against employers (5/28/2010 8:54:02 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: cuckoldmepls

Although Obama's popularity began to rise during the campaign when he talked about cancelling NAFTA or at least renegotiating it, it's not likely you will hear another word about it.


You are an idiot....Obamas popularity started to rise when he talked about cancelling NAFTA?

This is why he was elected, right?




Vendaval -> RE: Immigration debate, legal charges against employers (5/28/2010 8:56:02 AM)

Hi tazzy,

"In PA, the base salary for a server is 2.83."

And are you taxed on an estimated percentage of tips received instead of what is actually given as servers are in California?




Page: <<   < prev  7 8 [9] 10 11   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
4.699707E-02