Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Forget the Cadillac


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Forget the Cadillac Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Forget the Cadillac - 5/30/2010 7:09:03 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

quote:

They should put her ass behind bars.....Wait! That would cost the taxpayers an additional 40-50k a year.


Well if you sent her to california we could incarcerate her for a mear $23,000 per year for her $14,000 per year crime.


You didn't read the article did you? This happened in CA.



Are you reading impaired?
Tangela Ridgeway was the lady that dick cited who lives in cerritos california which is about 60 miles from where I live. Did you really think I did not know that.
My reference was to domiguy and the lady in question was one Alicia Garcia. Domiguy lives in chicago and was quoting prices for incarceration in illinois. In your rush to find fault with me you might try to find fault with my facts and not with what you wish I had said.

(in reply to thishereboi)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: Forget the Cadillac - 5/30/2010 7:13:50 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: eyesopened

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi
quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx
quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl
Apples to oranges. No fraud should ever be ignored, on any level.

Would you not agree that if you have a limited enforcement budget and limited jail facilities that one should concentrate on the larger larcenies?
Kinda like chasing down misdemeanor illegal aliens and ignoring the felony employers. It would seem that the pragamatic sanction of which gives you the most return on your investment would guide your priorities. That is if your priority is the reduction of fraud.

So you believe we should just ignore crimes if the profit is below a certain level? How much can I steal from your house before you think the law should come after me?


Just steal his stuff under a value of $400.  But you can rob him every year up to $400, as long as it isn't a firearm, a chicken, horse or goat, one of his cheaper koi fish, some piece of crap vehicle or anything he's carrying on his person.   You can take all the loose change in the Sparkletts water bottle.  He won't care.  You're not big enough to worry about.

Are you reading impaired?
I said:
Would you not agree that if you have a limited enforcement budget and limited jail facilities that one should concentrate on the larger larcenies?
Kinda like chasing down misdemeanor illegal aliens and ignoring the felony employers. It would seem that the pragamatic sanction of which gives you the most return on your investment would guide your priorities. That is if your priority is the reduction of fraud.
Please tell me what part of limited did you not understand.
How does the above equate with aproving of fraud.

(in reply to eyesopened)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: Forget the Cadillac - 5/30/2010 7:16:10 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: truckinslave

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

quote:

Garcia allegedly received more than $136,000 in public assistance benefits from January 2002 to April 2010."


$136,000/99months = $1,373 per month.
If I were hustling dead aluminum cans that is about a pound a day...bitch is obviously livin' large on the tax payers nickle.
How much did adm get in subsidies last year?
Yeah lets chase down all dem scheeming bitches and leave bill gates and ted turnover alone.


It's probably close to $1373/mo times 12,000,000.

Yes, I really do think illegal immigration costs this country more than a trillion per year.


That is only because you are ignorant or a bigot or both

(in reply to truckinslave)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: Forget the Cadillac - 5/30/2010 7:19:41 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

Apples to oranges. No fraud should ever be ignored, on any level.


Would you not agree that if you have a limited enforcement budget and limited jail facilities that one should concentrate on the larger larcenies?
Kinda like chasing down misdemeanor illegal aliens and ignoring the felony employers. It would seem that the pragamatic sanction of which gives you the most return on your investment would guide your priorities. That is if your priority is the reduction of fraud.


So you believe we should just ignore crimes if the profit is below a certain level? How much can I steal from your house before you think the law should come after me?



Are you reading impaired?
I said:
Would you not agree that if you have a limited enforcement budget and limited jail facilities that one should concentrate on the larger larcenies?
Kinda like chasing down misdemeanor illegal aliens and ignoring the felony employers. It would seem that the pragamatic sanction of which gives you the most return on your investment would guide your priorities. That is if your priority is the reduction of fraud.
Please tell me what part of limited did you not understand.
How does the above equate with aproving of fraud.


(in reply to thishereboi)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: Forget the Cadillac - 5/30/2010 7:23:16 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

Apples to oranges. No fraud should ever be ignored, on any level.



Are you reading impaired?
My bad you have already admitted you are.
I said:
Would you not agree that if you have a limited enforcement budget and limited jail facilities that one should concentrate on the larger larcenies?
Kinda like chasing down misdemeanor illegal aliens and ignoring the felony employers. It would seem that the pragamatic sanction of which gives you the most return on your investment would guide your priorities. That is if your priority is the reduction of fraud.
Please tell me what part of limited did you not understand.
How does the above equate with aproving of fraud.

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: Forget the Cadillac - 5/30/2010 7:41:07 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline 		At least im not repeating myself.

Nor did i speak of approving of any fraud.

A bit of your own reading impairment there.... boy!

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 26
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Forget the Cadillac Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.063