VaguelyCurious -> RE: How to feel more submissive (6/1/2010 1:55:17 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: sunshinemiss Totally disagreeing here VC. It is not my place (as a human) to tell someone else what they are doing is x, y, or z. Maybe this is where we're different-I don't see the world in terms of 'it is/is not my place to do x,y,z'-I see it in terms of 'I want x,y,z to happen-what's the most effective way of acheiving that goal?'. In my head it's not about whether I'm entitled to tell someone else something, it's about whether telling them it will have a positive effect on the situation. quote:
I take full responsibility for *my* part. If someone doesn't zing for me, I would say "I'm just not feeling it" rather than "you aren't zingy enough." One, that person is what they are, and they are perfectly zingy for somebody. That position assumes that the other person is being their 'authentic self' (much as I hate to use the words). What if they are holding back the zing-factor on your account? What if they've never been in a relationship where they've been *able* to be this zingy, and they need that little nudge to tell them it's ok, you can handle it? Dismissing them by saying 'I'm just not feeling it' seems a little harsh from over here-perhaps I've misunderstood your words, and you don't mean them as a dismissal? quote:
Two, the only person I can change is me. In this context I disagree-we're talking about outward behaviour rather than a set of inner core beliefs. She can say 'I'm struggling here' which will motivate him to change his behaviour in order to protect and preserve the relationship. Perhaps it's not a question of changing him herself, per se-just stating a fact that if the relationship is to thrive and be successful then a change will have to be made. quote:
If the other person's zing isn't doing it for me, then YES, I am having a problem with my zangy response. So she jacks in the relationship, or she does all the work to alter her submissive mindset, or he does all the work to be more outwardly dominant, or they work together and both change things to enable them to meet in the middle. I know which of those situations appeals the most to me, but again YMMV. quote:
And besides, what is a gray area but a whole bunch of lines smooshed together? *wink Sort of [:)]. But the use of the words 'fine line' implies that at one point on the scale you're doing one thing, and then you shift up a bit, cross a boundary, and suddenly you're doing the other thing-there's an implication that you can't be doing both at once which isn't present in the words 'grey area'.
|
|
|
|